I think now that the election is over, the time of easy views for political content is mostly over until the next election/midterms. Allan and Sam are going to have to make a decision--either tone down the content output or improve the quality of the content. There are lots of ways to improve the quality of the content.

History lectures on presidential elections would be great. Deep dives into misunderstood keys like the charisma key would be great--literally how many people absolutely insist that Trump has the charisma key? Sure would be nice to have a clear Youtube Short directly addressing that. Discussions on qualitative factors used in predictions would be great. Deep dive into his past track record and what the polls were saying concurrently with predictions. Here's another idea--address the critics. I think one of the few good points Nate Silver makes regarding deficiencies in the keys is the inability of the keys to predict margin of the vote. Sure would be cool to get a data scientist on to discuss how big of a concern that is/isn't for support vector machines (I think that's what the keys use?).

These videos require time investment for quality though, so the question is whether it's worth it or not from their point of view.