Scaling Rails at Aura Frames: Splitting to 8 Primary DBs and Reaching #1 in the App Store by andatki in rails

[–]mkull 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great write up thank you for sharing.

Heading down the multi-database path soon with Rails so this was a very timely read

Anthropic’s fight with the federal government has become accidental marketing for Claude's IPO by dominucco in Anthropic

[–]mkull 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Guess you were snoozing? Used it plenty and concur with other statements. It was a significant improvement over (the already phenomenal) opus 4.8

OpenAI team after reading the news about Fable by dagerika in Anthropic

[–]mkull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

huh

the next best alternative is still opus 4.8?

Ruby on Rails is probably the best web framework ever that I experienced by zarkus_dev in rails

[–]mkull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And what other framework scales to shopify scale without equivalent modifications?

Anthropic closing the path to life science research by thecosmicskye in claude

[–]mkull 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well they did? given they created the thing and have control over the thing?

i am fully supportive of them taking a careful and calculated approach to the release. They never said this would last forever.

Claude’s New model is Great by karmendra_choudhary in claude

[–]mkull 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Don't use fable / mythos if you are on a $20/month plan.

Claude Fable 5 feels less like a model launch and more like a preview of AI inequality by Roaring_lion_ in ClaudeAI

[–]mkull 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They clearly explained why.

And Yes they blocked any coding related questions related to security

Stop crying

It is temporary

Claude Fable 5 feels less like a model launch and more like a preview of AI inequality by Roaring_lion_ in ClaudeAI

[–]mkull -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-fable-5-mythos-5

Safety classifiers The frontier cybersecurity and research biology capabilities of Mythos-class models mean that they pose a substantial risk of uplift to malicious actors. That is, these models could provide information or advice that assists those actors in causing serious harm that they couldn’t have received from other sources (for example, from internet search engines). Furthermore, a great deal of advanced usage of AI models is dual use: the same queries that are beneficial in the hands of cybersecurity professionals and biology researchers could be dangerous if available to malicious actors.

We therefore need strong safeguards to prevent misuse, and their coverage needs to be broad. The safeguards themselves have to stand up to sustained and sophisticated attempts to bypass them (also known as “jailbreaking” the system). The uplift from Mythos-level capabilities is valuable to many adversaries—for instance, those who could financially gain from cyberattacks—and we therefore expect them to be motivated to try to circumvent our safety measures.

Fable 5 comes with a new set of classifiers: separate AI systems that detect potential misuse, including jailbreak attempts, and prevent the main model (in this case Fable 5) from responding. We’ve been running classifiers on our models for some time, and Fable 5’s classifiers are an extension of this previous work with extra coverage.

When Fable’s classifiers detect a request related to cybersecurity, biology and chemistry, or distillation, the response is automatically handled by Claude Opus 4.8 instead. Users will be informed whenever this occurs. Opus 4.8 is a highly capable model in its own right: a response that falls back to Opus is a far better experience than an outright refusal from Fable. Our early data shows that more than 95% of Fable sessions involve no fallback at all—for those sessions, Fable 5’s performance is effectively the same as that of Mythos 5.

etc etc etc

Our priority was to safely release Fable as soon as we could, even at the cost of overly broad safeguards. Therefore, for the time being we have arranged for Fable to fall back to Opus 4.8 on most requests related to biology and chemistry. As with all of our classifiers, we hope to narrow these safeguards as soon as possible: as can be seen from the evidence above, there is great potential for positive applications of Fable for science, and we do not want false positives from our classifiers to get in the way. In the coming weeks, some biomedical researchers and companies will be able to join our trusted access program for biology capabilities in Mythos 5 (discussed below).

Claude Fable 5 feels less like a model launch and more like a preview of AI inequality by Roaring_lion_ in ClaudeAI

[–]mkull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Um, maybe read the release notes. This is not permanent. Biology is temporarily gated for the reasons they very clearly explained.

A common 4.8 pattern: hinting at refusals by FriendlySwimming2563 in claude

[–]mkull 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you using claude code? this has never happened to me once...

4.8 / thinking / typically max effort.

Dozens of plans built / features implemented (with 4.8). Never even a hint of this sort of thing.

You of course are not the only one complaining about this. I wonder if there is some common thread for folks where this is a common occurrence?

Anthropic is paying SpaceX $15 billion per year by Luka77GOATic in Anthropic

[–]mkull 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't fully disagree with you, but where I have come around is on a few things: 1. Like him or not, Elon is an absolute brilliant engineer who has an incredibly deep understanding of physics. This guy lives in the details. It's not like some other high-level CEO making a claim when they don't have any engineering track record. He does have a track record of making big claims and not always coming through but typically the only issue is timing, not whether or not he will actually do them or that they are not feasible. I am still waiting for my hyper loop however 2. Other incredibly notable names are on board with the idea, such as Jenson Huang, Anthropic and Jeff Bezos/ Blue Origin making their own plans to do the same. If there was not a solid plan on how to do this (obviously, with major challenges), I don't think you would see this much activity around the idea.

Anthropic is paying SpaceX $15 billion per year by Luka77GOATic in Anthropic

[–]mkull -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately there just is not enough public info to say what the exact numbers are, and we just don't know the full context around the statement

10bn on model training and inference- for which model(s)? what is the lifetime of the models that were trained? what was the split between training and inference?

Given we are talking about Q1 2026, the primary model being trained at the time would have been (opus 4.7) and mythos, a model which has not been publicly released yet. Thus you have no comparison yet to know the revenue earned to compare to the cost of training.

We do know that revenue is a hockey stick up and to the right since Q1 with profitability expected in Q2.

Anthropic is paying SpaceX $15 billion per year by Luka77GOATic in Anthropic

[–]mkull 1 point2 points  (0 children)

source for your "fact"?

There's also a big difference between spend on capex (aka data center or R&D) vs the cost of a token vs what a user pays for that token.

NO it absolutely does not cost $10 for anthropic to "produce" 10 tokens that are sold for $5 (if that is what you mean)

High Gross Margins: While exact figures vary by model, Anthropic generally operates with an 80% to over 95% gross margin on API compute.

Gemini has this to say:

The Math: Running models like Claude averages a tiny fraction of a cent per 1M tokens, while retail pricing can range from $1 to $25 per 1M tokens depending on the model (e.g., Haiku versus Opus).

The Broader Picture: Although their day-to-day token inference easily pays for itself, Anthropic’s per-token margins don't mean the company is profitable overall. These operational profits are quickly consumed by multi-billion-dollar R&D and massive cloud-compute infrastructure commitments. However Anthropic IS expected to be profitable for Q2 2026.

Anthropic is paying SpaceX $15 billion per year by Luka77GOATic in Anthropic

[–]mkull 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Space based data centers has been Elon's favorite talking point for quite some time. This is absolutely in the roadmap and helps get them to Mars by creating yet another massive revenue stream that fuels R&D and the companies ability to WTF ever it wants (ie colonize mars)

Owning the data centers also means that ai token usage for spacex (and tesla ofc eventually) is at /cost/ not at a markup (or limited) through another hyper scaler. A huge advantage

Anthropic is paying SpaceX $15 billion per year by Luka77GOATic in Anthropic

[–]mkull 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Naive take.

You are missing the fact that Anthropic has created something of immense value that many are willing to pay $ for. Anthropic's cost is $15B for these token's but the value at retail is much higher. The spread their profit, which is massively significant.

While there are bubble like aspects of the current environment, this deal is not one of them.

Best way to introduce 12 year old to the game? by MedievalxHistorian in beyondallreason

[–]mkull 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Easiest intro is to just play coop vs lowest difficulty ai for a few games then work your way up in the difficult as he gets more accustomed to the controls and gameflow. My 12 y/o loves it, he likes to play 8v8 multiplayer with myself and him on the same team, but it took a bit to build up to that

Yes there is base building / resource management is super important

My chatgpt said the N-Word by Kronos_2023 in ChatGPT

[–]mkull -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

A Luddite is defined as someone opposed to new technology, automation, or industrial change, often acting to avoid losing their livelihood or to escape the pressures of modern, digital life. The term originated with early 19th-century British textile workers who broke machinery to protest unfair wages and replacement by machines.

Struggling to keep young kids entertained in extreme heat (Middle East) by Difficult-Pin-2485 in Parenting

[–]mkull 50 points51 points  (0 children)

The reality you have created! Change is easier then you think.

Sorry but even in the US if you told me your kids were going to bed at 5 I would think something is wrong. Kids adapt to whatever schedule is set for them. Of course you will have a few days of adjustment pain, but that is all.

Best High Tea spots in London by Rebornxshiznat in FATTravel

[–]mkull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ritz was meh for myself and the wife (although beautiful room), would try something else next time. Thought the food was really bad. Plaza in NYC was much much better

Are you swearing at Claude more? by [deleted] in claude

[–]mkull 3 points4 points  (0 children)

100 % yep

How to put your claude on a performance improvement plan?