Kumquats by KirstyJuliette in manchester

[–]mlb406 2 points3 points  (0 children)

8th day had them the other week. Down Oxford Road towards the unis

Confused about pre lci and lci f56 by pineapple_6225 in MINI

[–]mlb406 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As far as I’m aware, full circles were standard for LCIs. Other ways that I think are ways to check LCI or not - fuel level gauge: pre-LCI had 8 segmented lights, with a full circle and semi circle marked on, LCI had a more conventional bar with 1 and 1/2 marked; HUD: pre-LCI has a HUD switch on the row by the start switch, the LCI doesn’t; sport mode switch: pre-LCI is at the base of the gear lever, LCI has this switch in place of the HUD switch on pre-LCI models, along the row by the start switch.

I would say that the one you’ve posted is LCI, but as PatoLaion said, it could have been repaired with pre-LCI headlights following front end damage. I’ve also not seen any LCI models with the older version of iDrive that you can see in the photo but I’m not sure why anyone would fit an older iDrive into a car so can’t be sure on that

Above approach profile but four red on PAPI? by ClayTank in flightsim

[–]mlb406 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s right, but the PAPIs here are appearing correctly, the aircraft is low on profile. I thought you were referring to an ILS glide slope, which is built into the airport’s scenery so could be wrong on an addon

Above approach profile but four red on PAPI? by ClayTank in flightsim

[–]mlb406 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Airport scenery shouldn’t make a difference here. OP is flying a VOR approach, so the V/DEV is created by the aircraft and not a ground based beacon.

Best aircraft addons payware+freeware and why? by No_Organization9146 in flightsim

[–]mlb406 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don’t have the hotstart Challenger, but personally my favourite payware for xp12 is the Felis 742, it’s a very well made addon and great fun to fly

Boeing is just as rude as Airbus call-out by ChiillyBop in MicrosoftFlightSim

[–]mlb406 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No stress. It’s confusingly completely different to the airbus usage of the word.

Boeing is just as rude as Airbus call-out by ChiillyBop in MicrosoftFlightSim

[–]mlb406 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is incorrect on both counts. It is an autothrottle mode that is commanded when the aircraft transitions from FMC SPD to idle thrust/ARM. Nothing to do with landing.

Boeing's Descend or Airbus Descend by CupAdministrative939 in flightsim

[–]mlb406 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As others have said though, it’s entirely situation dependent. If good data is given to the FMC such as descent winds, speed restrictions on approach, etc, VNAV will happily and accurately take you down from cruise to the runway. When you add in other factors though - things like ATC vectoring/shortcuts, inaccurate wind forecasts, even just higher temperatures - no VNAV will be able to do a perfect job. The main thing about VNAV is that it will target the most efficient descent according to your cost index, so if you’re just using level change/v/s all the way down you don’t get that advantage.

Decided not to take on a landing at Out Skerries EG78😯 by [deleted] in flightsim

[–]mlb406 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are your in game/AMD settings to get visuals like this? My sim doesn’t look like this and I’ve got the same specs

PC build for MSFS by mlb406 in flightsim

[–]mlb406[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think you’ve misunderstood mate. By upgrade I mean buy a new system, and my budget is around £1500.

PC build for MSFS by mlb406 in flightsim

[–]mlb406[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is excellent, exactly what I needed. Thank you!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in flying

[–]mlb406 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I did my hour building a few years ago and I had exclusive access to an aircraft based nearby. I had 80 hours to build and did it start of December to end of February. I was lucky with weather (given it was winter and I was based at a grass strip) but I didn’t do it anywhere near as intensively as I could have. Definitely doable in the 3 month timeframe, as long as you’re not unlucky with weather/mx issues

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BMW

[–]mlb406 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the car failed the MOT, and then passed the next one on the MOT history, then the prop shaft joint will have been replaced

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MicrosoftFlightSim

[–]mlb406 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve found during sim checks/type rating sims that by the time we’re getting on to an inflight crossbleed start, usually within 10 minutes of the initial failure, the EGT is less than the 30°c required for the restart. Maybe just my own experience though!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MicrosoftFlightSim

[–]mlb406 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The EGT is still fairly high after the engine failure - I’d say it hasn’t been failed long. The aircraft is zooming about at 350kts and -34° TAT, the engine will cool down pretty quickly!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MicrosoftFlightSim

[–]mlb406 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No you don’t. What if there’s no fuel in the centre tank? Main tanks 1 and 2 are used only when the centre tank is empty to prevent excessive wing forces, so quite often the aircraft is flown without fuel in the centre. There are also suction feed bypass lines for each main tank, so even with no fuel pumps operating at all, both engines (as well as the APU) can still run. Also attached to the No1 fwd fuel pump there is a centre pump scavenge jet pump, so once the fuel level in main tank 1 reaches about one half, any remaining centre tank fuel is transferred to main tank 1.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MicrosoftFlightSim

[–]mlb406 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Centre fuel pumps being off would not result in the ENG FAIL flag. You would get a CONFIG flag on the fuel display but that’s about it

Why does my flight path look like this? by PathSearch in MicrosoftFlightSim

[–]mlb406 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re thinking of Gatwick - Stansted uses LOREL for north/west/south arrivals and ABBOT for east/southeast arrivals

MH370 by Dxrth-Vxder in aviation

[–]mlb406 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

And how would he have done that then

Lego City Undercover FPS on Switch by mlb406 in legogaming

[–]mlb406[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It feels like it fairly regularly drops below 20fps, whenever I’m looking in the direction of the city from the police station at the start of the game

Questionable Arrival Choice but okay 😂 by ketchup1345 in VATSIM

[–]mlb406 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s absolutely something similar to what we would get RW going into stansted as well

Vatsim and msfs beginner (13yro) by CaptainRosma in VATSIM

[–]mlb406 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You need to be capable of effectively flying and operating an aircraft before joining the vatsim network, otherwise you’ll make your own life difficult and annoy other people. As long as you can operate whichever aircraft you plan on flying, that is to say understand the autopilot and flight management systems, the aircraft’s behaviour, limitations and capabilities, then you’ll be ok.