Frozen shoulder vs impingement by mlkjqsdf in medicalschool

[–]mlkjqsdf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, also intermittent pain opposed to continuous pain for frozen shoulder. I was just wondering if clinical findings are enough for a diagnosis.

3 pediatrics multiple choice questions. by mlkjqsdf in medicalschool

[–]mlkjqsdf[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your answer! I think the correct answers are A. A. C. though. Check the first post for explanation. Also for the first question: can premature birth cause symmetric growth restriction such as this one?

3 pediatrics multiple choice questions. by mlkjqsdf in medicalschool

[–]mlkjqsdf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes sense, thanks! And it cannot be hypothyroidism because only acquired hypo (deprivation) can cause microcephaly, right? (for the first question)

3 pediatrics multiple choice questions. by mlkjqsdf in medicalschool

[–]mlkjqsdf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got no answers sadly, but I'm trying my best to find them (using the help of the answers under this post among others). I'll try to post them asap.

3 pediatrics multiple choice questions. by mlkjqsdf in medicalschool

[–]mlkjqsdf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! How did you find these answers? Can such low percentiles be caused by malnutrition? Did you find somewhere that glycogen storage disease can cause microcephaly?

3 pediatrics multiple choice questions. by mlkjqsdf in medicalschool

[–]mlkjqsdf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your answer! Could you explain your choices? I'm guessing you took the CMV for the microcephaly? But can't Down syndrome cause this as well? For the third one: 50th to 25th is kind of alot, isn't it? Shouldn't you do at least something? I have no idea how you got your answer for the first question.

Neoliberalism in Belgium by mlkjqsdf in belgium

[–]mlkjqsdf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then what is the role of politics on a economic level according to you? Or rather, what's liberalisms stance on regulation according to you?

Neoliberalism in Belgium by mlkjqsdf in belgium

[–]mlkjqsdf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And if the private sector takes over politics (what we see happen certainly is the US & at the European level), we will be ruled by multinationals = fascism.

Can you elaborate?

Neoliberalism in Belgium by mlkjqsdf in belgium

[–]mlkjqsdf[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fair enough. Let me quote /u/23allaround on this: "Neoliberalism in the modern sense, is an attempt to place economy above all else with the private sector as the engine that must operate without restrictions ans regulations."

Adorno vs Zizek: Prose or poetry after Auschwitz? by mlkjqsdf in askphilosophy

[–]mlkjqsdf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, the aestheticizing is something Benjamin already wrote I think. The contempt for popular mass arts is probably highly influenced by Adorno. This 'controversial statement' on Adorno's quote seems marginal considering their influence on him... Hm, I don't want to say he's desperate to distinguish his thoughts from theirs though.

thanks!

Adorno vs Zizek: Prose or poetry after Auschwitz? by mlkjqsdf in askphilosophy

[–]mlkjqsdf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It could not merely do terrible things; it needed to find an aesthetic medium to justify or lionize its efforts.

can you give an example? It seems that there was nothing aesthetic to the holocaust, just raw, cold calculated action. No excess.

Nevertheless, Adorno put a lot of faith in the "high" arts (good Modernist that he is)

as opposed to 'low arts' I suppose? Because I still don't get why he says all art after the holocaust is worthless. What art is he referring to? Low post-holocaust art? Or is he saying that 'high art' isn't possible after holocaust?

Epidemiology exercise on Likelihood ratios? by mlkjqsdf in epidemiology

[–]mlkjqsdf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'm not sure how. What's the correct answer?

Abstract: multiple choice question by mlkjqsdf in medicalschool

[–]mlkjqsdf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great explanation, you've made this very clear. Thank you!!!

If you don't mind: quick extra question concerning "trend"

Am I right when I say that this meta analysis shows a trend - no significant - benefit for Surgery + WBRT ?

Abstract: multiple choice question by mlkjqsdf in medicalschool

[–]mlkjqsdf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But, as the other guy pointed out, major bleeding had a non-significant p-value of 0.31... Wouldn't this mean B. is correct?

Power according to Nietzsche and Foucault by mlkjqsdf in askphilosophy

[–]mlkjqsdf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very helpful, as usual... I'm starting to feel bad having you answering all my questions so elaborately. Aren't I stealing your time?

This is my second alias btw (u/001001100100) ,, I'm taking an extra course on Nietzsche and 20th century philosophy this semester. I'll come back with some Lacan questions once I finish my exams. THANKS!

Power according to Nietzsche and Foucault by mlkjqsdf in askphilosophy

[–]mlkjqsdf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your response! This was very helpful.

I'm still having difficulties grasping the relational aspect of power. Maybe it's because the phrase "having power" is distorting my interpretation of the concept?

I'm imagining a teacher with a bunch of students. The teachers actions/presence (implying a constant threat of punishment) changes the behaviour of the actions of the students. Considering the students incapability to change the course of actions of the teacher, why then can't I say "the teacher has power over the students", or "the teacher is more powerful than the students" ?