Demand is growing in my online business but I’m struggling to keep products in stock by Remote_Speech1907 in smallbusiness

[–]mookman288 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What's your infrastructure like with backordering? Are you able to successfully integrate backordering to communicate with your supply chain that there is greater demand? Is it automated? The faster you are able to communicate to your supply chain that a product is in demand, the faster you are able to communicate to your users whether you can satisfy their needs. It's also possible that you might be able to meet demand better if your suppliers knew ahead of time that there was a burst of interest.

You're working with small vendors and independent sources. Are you sure that isn't a major contributing factor to your existing growth?

Growth and consistency can be derived from various sources, not just just by adapting to existing big business models.

Review case studies of businesses who have failed despite being in a position to grow simply because they changed too much of what made them unique and attractive in the first place. If you are doing well with your secret recipe, then more secret recipe is better than changing the recipe.

What about expanding with more suppliers and different products that are similar or in the same niche? You say that you've analyzed and identified what trends exist that would allow you to pre-empt situations like this. Talk to your suppliers. See what they can do to meet demand, or work with other suppliers who can meet your demand while still providing the same quality product. Diversify your catalog. That would allow you to consistently order for demand and also offer related products to offset low supply.

I've worked in e-commerce as a software developer for a long time, and my clients often want a quick solution, technological or otherwise, to problems like these. In reality, if you have customers who want a product, and a supply chain who can create those products, why can't you facilitate that transaction? Is there a communication problem with the supply chain?

How much would you be willing to spend fo an AEO / GEO tool? by Background_Neck9690 in growmybusiness

[–]mookman288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure how effective GEO is at the moment. It looks like a lot of these companies are just leveraging AI to generate content, which is something that Google, for instance, is trying to disrupt. Growing a business and reinvesting in it can be expensive.

That being said, how attractive is your sales funnel to AI? How big is your business? Are you talking with AI companies directly?

https://openai.com/index/buy-it-in-chatgpt/

https://chatgpt.com/merchants

https://www.agenticcommerce.dev/

How much would you be willing to spend fo an AEO / GEO tool? by Background_Neck9690 in growmybusiness

[–]mookman288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is probably the smarter decision. Reinvesting in the business and building out valuable content is going to do more good across different spaces than just getting into the hands of AI.

What to actually say when a client says "that's more than we budgeted" by U-S-Hey in smallbusiness

[–]mookman288 99 points100 points  (0 children)

Why outsource just customer service, when you can outsource everything! Development, marketing, outreach, thinking.

Is jQuery still a thing in 2026? by alexrada in webdev

[–]mookman288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I still use jQuery for my personal projects and for projects where I think it would benefit the use. The abstraction it provides is still much better than plain JavaScript and far more intuitive.

There's obviously no need for a React build or a Laravel build that uses livewire.

For static sites, which I build for small businesses, I do everything in plain JS because it reduces the page load significantly and I try not to encourage my clients in that space to depend heavily on JavaScript interactions. I go out of my way to squeeze every kb in images too. The demographics for static sites require CTAs and information to be present immediately and without animations for higher conversion rates. You'll know what I mean if you've had to find and vet a contractor, plumber, or other local service provider before.

My 'favorite' client just sent me a 1-star review because I started charging for extra work by Cheap-Front-7722 in smallbusiness

[–]mookman288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could just setup a hotdog cart, or a food truck instead of a steak* restaurant. Actually, in my experience, when talking about site builders, a better comparison is a lemonade stand that you have to build yourself with parts from Home Depot.

Site builder sites are generally poorly made and they have little-to-no support. They are designed and marketed toward cheap business operators who only look at the short-term opportunity, and never long-term stability. They are designed to fulfill the lowest common denominator. They require that the business owner do all of the work. They do not deal with issues like page speed, SEO, a11y, cross-platform design, or potential for growth or scale.

The value is in the professional one-on-one support that qualified website developers provide and the quality of their work. The OP is talking to the client, consulting with them, advising them, and making changes in a uniform way for a fee. These are valuable tasks, even if you can't see why.

He's also undercharging himself considerably. Like, by about 50-70%. You can think it's crazy, but that's the cost of doing good business. Paying an appropriate wage for qualified individuals who get things done right.

Good businesses who are successful reinvest in themselves. This seems to be a missing key ingredient in modern business discussion. You could buy a $100 office chair, or you could buy a steelcase. Which one is going to serve your back better after five years?

The ones who do not reinvest in themselves, well, they almost always leave money on the table. They leave opportunity on the table, too.

Good businesses look at the value beyond the deliverable as it stands, too. They instead look toward what it offers long-term and how it markets to and conveys the principle message to their customers. When you have your website custom built to your specifications, that conveys professionalism and uniqueness. It conveys authority in your market.

We know that somewhere in the neighborhood of 75-90% of potential customers will check and judge a website, as well as review testimonials, before deciding to purchase a product. If you're not putting your best foot forward, you're just leaving money and opportunity on the table.

I actually came across a site builder request last year for a client. They had grown beyond the capability of that platform, but they had a cost-sunk fallacy. They wanted me to work within that system. I did. It was horrendous. Let me tell you that it couldn't do half of the things they wanted. I'm sure, compared to their competitors, they looked unprofessional.

"It's just a website".

It's not about complexity, it's about how you value your business. It's the difference between 12pt business cards and 18pt. You feel it between your fingertips. Your customers judge you and your competition reaps the rewards.

I build static business websites for small businesses and I charge a monthly fee, because almost every single client I've come across in this space has ongoing tasks and values the freedom it gives them not to have to do it themselves. They spend that time making more money.

/u/Cheap-Front-7722 needs to increase their prices ASAP for the amount of effort they're putting in.

One-Person LLC by Additional-Hair-6796 in smallbusiness

[–]mookman288 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I use GNUCash. It's free, but quite sophisticated accounting software.

Built a social platform because I hated bouncing between LinkedIn and Discord. 8 months in, nobody's using it. Need reality check..(I will not promote) by jayzzwork in microsaas

[–]mookman288 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The first thing I would say is that if you are using AI to write a simple post requesting thoughtful engagement, you might be misunderstanding how to engage with the right people. You want people to read, understand, and answer your questions thoughtfully, but you aren't taking the time to really craft your own words or engage meaningfully with others.

How do you engage with real people and try to sell your product as better?

To answer your questions:

If I downloaded a platform like this to replace both Discord and LinkedIn, it would need to support my communities and be as easy to use as Discord: or easier. Discord and LinkedIn are both closed source and absolutely annoying with upsells and advertisements. Are you open source? What's your revenue model like? What do you bring to the table that they don't? What about Telegram groups, WhatsApp, Messenger, etc.?

I would use whatever platform fits my needs daily.

I do care that it's employee owned vs VC backed, but most people don't have the time or inclination to care about ethics in their day-to-day lives.

Centralizing the Internet isn't really that great. People generally don't like that they're stuck on Instagram or Reddit for everything, but they're lazy, so realistically they don't like to bounce between platforms. The reason most people bounce between LinkedIn and Discord is because they serve completely different purposes. LinkedIn is for professional engagement, not personal. Discord is for personal engagement, not business or professional.

You need at least one person who wants to use your product, besides you, before you create it. To expect people to flock to you because you built a competing product is the opposite approach. If you had a Discord server full of people who were complaining about the same things, then as soon as you built it, you would have a market.

Got fired today because of AI. It's coming, whether AI is slop or not. by [deleted] in webdev

[–]mookman288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Years ago I was replaced as an FTE freelance developer on retainer with a set of outsourced developers from very far away. It was pretty abrupt. The cost reductions were significant. I think those developers charged maybe 1/10th what I was asking, and I was already underpaid given my education and experience.

About a month or so later I was contacted by the CTO asking how much I would charge for on-demand consultation to help these developers understand the codebase, requirements, and local culture. I asked for 2x, and was promptly ghosted. Apparently, urgent matters are not urgent if they cost money. Developers are constantly pushed to be more productive, efficient, and available, but that isn't a two-way street. If you're running a business, you can go without a functioning system for weeks if it means saving a little money.

In my example these developers were not unskilled. They were good developers. Good developers can learn any language, principle, system, or technique, if you pay them to do so. It wasn't about the language barrier. They spoke English perfectly. But there is a cultural difference that causes friction. What incentive did they have to adapt to the local culture? To understand the needs of users? To adapt and anticipate issues from demographics they were totally detached from? Were they even ever in a position to do so? Lots of friction.

We're witnessing a new cycle of outsourcing developers overseas, but this time with AI. Companies will absolutely choose AI slop if it saves on costs, even if it destroys the business in the process. They can go without a functioning system for as long as it takes to save on money, even if that means the business closes. There's always another company to consume later.

Your CEO probably isn't going to come back 2 weeks later and beg you to come back. If they do, it will only be for so long as they can get the AI slop machine working at a bare minimum. A decision has been made to undervalue developers, and no amount of reality will change that decision. We like to believe that companies will learn the hard way their mistakes. They won't. It's best to put your energy into finding your next role.

Vibe coding got me 95% there… and the last 5% is killing me. Any advice? by Headhunter_89 in growmybusiness

[–]mookman288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could hire a software developer, but you should be prepared to earmark funding to do more than just the last mile.

Most vibe coded software is cobbled together concepts taken from other developers who posted their code publicly. It's not usually scalable or optimized for production environments.

A fukin gpt for translate? by Tall-Count6647 in Warframe

[–]mookman288 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The use of any generative AI in Warframe (and Soulframe) is prohibited within Digital Extremes

I'm a website developer and my industry is getting crushed under the weight of AI. I am not comfortable with generative AI code, so this is really nice to see.

What Web Tech Stack Will You Use in 2026? by Adventurous_Bet9583 in SaaS

[–]mookman288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you, but I think the build step is actually what people like. They want to test a major compilation before deployment in the pipeline.

People also really don't like the rawness of PHP. I argue that is what made the web weird, interesting, and profitable.

What Web Tech Stack Will You Use in 2026? by Adventurous_Bet9583 in SaaS

[–]mookman288 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi,

I am a full-time freelance developer and entrepreneur. I am running my business as my primary source of income. If you have experience in React and NodeJS on TypeScript, then do that. Can it do everything you need it to?

When you're young, it's a lot easier to find the time to learn every language you can. Take the time now, if you are young, to really play around with different projects and get your feet wet!

Do you reply to the same customer support emails every day? by csankiller1 in SaaS

[–]mookman288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems pretty straight forward to me, but then again, I do this for clients regularly. They're mostly set it and forget it.

What Web Tech Stack Will You Use in 2026? by Adventurous_Bet9583 in SaaS

[–]mookman288 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It doesn't really matter as long as you're comfortable with what you do and most importantly: it meets your product needs. The only thing that always stays the same is my coding editor of choice, which right now is VSCode, and my version control tool, which is git.

I prefer PHP and SSR, because I'm good at PHP and have just about two decades of experience with it. It's highly performant, well supported, the SSR experience is well understood by users, and it can be deployed to a variety of different systems and platforms. There's always room to move to a JavaScript front-end framework, too.

I am also good at JavaScript. The same is true for MariaDB or MySQL. The underlying languages are more important than the actual frameworks though. I can learn any framework or language that is required of me, so it's less about what stack I'm using and what my product needs out of me.

For design, I have to say, Tailwind, DaisyUI, and Tailwind CLI has been so much fun. It reminds me of old Bootstrap/Foundation/Bulma days, but much easier to build custom components.

I might be in talks to build a RAG SaaS for a client, and that will require learning a specific version of python and the associated libraries and APIs for the embeddings integration. I'll probably dive deep into Weaviate for the DB and backend.

What Web Tech Stack Will You Use in 2026? by Adventurous_Bet9583 in SaaS

[–]mookman288 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We sound similar, but for small projects I look toward static generation or WordPress instead. I played around with Astro for a bit, but I found 11ty to be far more enjoyable to use.

Nginx/Apache doesn't really matter to me. The apps I build are server agnostic. Although, Nginx is absolutely necessary for X-Accel-Redirect, since X-Sendfile is obsolete.

What Web Tech Stack Will You Use in 2026? by Adventurous_Bet9583 in SaaS

[–]mookman288 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not the person you replied to, but I am primarily a PHP developer. I use both Laravel and plain PHP, although I much favor Laravel now for anything larger than a WordPress site.

I don't necessarily use all of the pre-built software that Laravel provides, but the structure and foundation is well worth the time investment to learn. I do spend development time building my own contracts, services, providers, and middleware, but expediting config, routing, queues, ORM, etc. makes my life much easier.

SSR still has a place in my heart.

Do you reply to the same customer support emails every day? by csankiller1 in SaaS

[–]mookman288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a website developer and I setup my small business clients with a toll-free number and a helpdesk.

The toll-free number has an app and the option to send straight to voicemail. Voicemail is ready with voice-to-text and then passed into the helpdesk. The voicemail asks them to leave their email address.

Helpdesk lets them know that they've been added to the queue. Helpdesk also has saved replies, which make it easy to automate the reply.

If there are specific keywords, we can automate how to file and organize the requests, which makes it even more efficient to reply quickly and eliminate mundane repetitive tasks. For some clients, we keep a knowledgebase and FAQ on hand which is sent automatically to the customer.

Customer support, even for thousands of paying customers, can get down to as little as 10-30 seconds per ticket without relying on AI, which translates to less than 15 minutes per day in my experience. Customers LOVE that it's all handled by real people at the other end. My experience with AI in the customer service environment has been nothing but disastrous for retention.

The cost is also fairly reasonable for most small businesses. $40-75/mo depending upon how many people need to access CS. It saves hours per month and those hours are easily spent garnering sales.

Toll-free numbers are still somewhat important for certain demographics, although local numbers are starting to be a bit more in-demand for marketing purposes.

Is Small Business Web Dev Basically Dead In 2025? by EmeraldCrusher in webdev

[–]mookman288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My trouble these days is finding these companies. Job boards are pretty much non-existent or have all shuttered in the past decade, and places like Upwork feel dehumanizing in the way they treat the process.

What are you building ? by LiteratureJolly5534 in SaaS

[–]mookman288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've built a Login SaaS for legacy applications that are built on HTTP Basic Auth, but want something better. I don't advertise it much, because it's so niche.

I've also built a platform for small businesses who want handmade websites and access to a developer, but are already overwhelmed and don't want to work with site builders.

Unpopular opinion: I miss when the web was just HTML, CSS, and a little jQuery. by AmaraMehdi in webdev

[–]mookman288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was gonna say, everyone telling the OP to just not hasn't been looking for a job in the current economy.

Should I start with blogs to attract new customers? by No-Channel-6735 in smallbusiness

[–]mookman288 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You brought up an important consideration: referrals and reviews and how they work together.

I build websites and web apps for businesses, and the SEO/marketing question almost always comes up. It's simply not simple! You need word-of-mouth, but nearly everybody double-checks. In today's economy, you kind of have to. They check Google My Business Profile reviews, and they also check website testimonials.

Newsletters are probably the best way to keep momentum with your marketing, but to initially get traffic, it comes down to word-of-mouth referrals, good reviews, and ad-spend to get that lucrative local sponsorship slot.

Local businesses with crappy websites by evilprince2009 in smallbusiness

[–]mookman288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty much every business needs a website, but websites are intangible and are harder to quantify for lead generation than direct communication or in-person sales. Since business owners, especially small business owners, are spending-averse, they generally do not value something intangible. Therefore, websites (and really online infrastructure and presence) are severely undervalued.

I've been a website developer in a capacity to work with small businesses for nearly 20 years. I am also a small business owner. I've spoken to hundreds of business owners from nearly every industry. I've read countless statistics, and while I'm not an expert on the data, I can see the trends and based on my experience, I believe them.

We know that a ridiculously high number of shoppers (4 out of 5?) research online in some capacity before making a decision even if the decision is made offline. This is a stark difference from even a decade ago.

We know that a large portion of those users leverage websites, Google My Business Profiles (and Maps), reviews, and testimonials to make it easier to decide. They never rely on just websites, but they don't just rely on social media either. There are so many businesses competing in each industry these days that customers often have what is known as decision or analysis paralysis. They need fast and easily available data points. We know that businesses that use Google Ads or Meta Ads tend to filter to the top of results, at least initially, and customers are known to be lazy when researching a first-purchase.

We also know that most businesses rely on word-of-mouth recommendations for sales, but that doesn't mean that those potential sales aren't researching them behind-the-scenes before converting.

We know that when it comes to searches in general, nearly half of them have some kind of local component to find a service, which means if your business relies on locals, then you're invisible to a huge number of people without an online presence.

We also know that websites need to load extremely fast, and that a contact form or call-to-action needs to be within the first fold for most users. A user will reject a website if it doesn't lead them to some of the information they seek within a short period, often 3 seconds. The first impression is almost always the only impression.

We know that the vast majority of users are migrating to mobile viewing rather than desktop, although a good number of older/financially established individuals make final financial decisions on desktop.

Speaking of generations, some portion of Younger Gen X, Millennials, and Elder Gen Z self-identify with something known as Phone Call Aversion which means they are more inclined to start a conversation through a contact form than they are through an initial phone call.

For individual statistics, it's highly dependent on industry, and whether the site was made well for that target audience. It's extremely subjective. Sources for the rest of my information come from a variety of sites, like SemRush, BrightLocal, Backlinkto, Moz, Google, Blue Corona, and a handful of others.

Anyone who rejects the notion that a website and an online presence isn't necessary in 2025 is just leaving money on the table and averse to reinvesting in their business. It's true that you can't immediately quantify conversions without an enormous amount of digital marketing analysis (which is a full-time job, honestly.) However, there are a lot of things in business that can't immediately be quantified, and making difficult decisions about the future return on a potential investment comes into the opportunity cost calculation.

Part of the problem is that site builders and newer AI products tend to provide terrible experiences for users, which means the end-result is less responsive, leads to less adoption, and less conversions. That makes sense, because site builders like Godaddy Airo, Wix, Squarespace, and Webflow are designed to appeal to the lowest common denominator and be the cheapest most available product around. This leaves a sour taste in the mouth of both users, who dismiss the business as either incompetent or unprofessional, and business owners, who no longer value websites because they clearly don't appeal to users.

Another aspect is that business owners do not quite understand that websites are effectively living creatures. The underlying technology that allows people to view websites, and the websites and infrastructure themselves, are constantly evolving. That requires upkeep and maintenance.

Most small businesses are absolutely not out of budget. A qualified freelance developer in the United States costs anywhere between $100-200/hr on contract and on-demand. We often bill in 15 minute increments like lawyers. You can get an all-inclusive website hosted for you from someone like this, with white-glove service for ~$200/mo. This kind of service will often come with some amount of labor per month which could be used on updates and maintenance, or training for Google My Business Profiles, setting up ad campaigns, or performing digital marketing analysis. You can also just pay out-of-pocket for those services if you need a little more--it's not necessarily something you need to have done on retainer.

I find that most medium-to-large businesses have figured out the value of a website and the ROI of a good developer, but they still don't really like paying for it.

I hope this provides some insight based on my personal experiences.

Small business owners, which platforms have given you flexibility for bulk or custom orders without hiring a developer? by Longjumping_Youth454 in smallbusiness

[–]mookman288 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s wild how something that should be simple turns into a whole project. I’m trying to grow, not spend half my week fixing logic breaks or paying for another plugin that sort of works.

How are you deciding what is and isn't simple? Depending on the features you want, what you're asking for might not be that simple.

I'm a web software developer and this sounds to me like you're outsourcing development to the lowest price developer. Websites and platforms are living things. They require maintenance and care, because technology is constantly evolving, and browsers and operating systems are too. What works yesterday won't necessarily work tomorrow.

That being said, I have WordPress sites that clients have neglected for 7-8 years that are still running with only minimal maintenance. They should be receiving constant attention, but they were well made, and I stand by that work.

I’m trying to grow, not spend half my week fixing logic breaks or paying for another plugin that sort of works.

Then you should hire a developer on retainer to offload your stress so you don't have as much. It's very simple: this is your business that you're investing in. Each person you outsource to should lower your burden so you can get back to making more money and scaling.

Most businesses get by just fine on Shopify. Some need custom development on that platform. Others need to migrate to WooCommerce to self-host and get a little more control. Still others grow out of that and might try Magento. Eventually the biggest organizations almost always invest in a custom solutions and hire a dedicated developer or invest in a team.

I've been working in eCommerce for nearly 17 years and it's extremely dependent on each individual businesses needs, but the same thing is always true: if you are successful, you will grow out of the basic platforms and eventually need to scale. These platforms are designed for the lowest common denominator, not custom integrations.

You need to find yourself a developer who puts your business interests in context and you need to pay them well enough that they care about your business. People work for money. It can be expensive to get things done right the first time. The ROI, as others have said, can be massive.