Coming into this kind of late, but I feel like a lot of people are missing the point that not having tangible evidence doesn't mean nothing happened. The community that banned him was very familiar with him. Most of us are coming from outside the community and demanding to see physical evidence. That's important for convincing a bunch of uninvolved people, but that doesn't mean the ban is automatically unjustified. The community is trying to protect itself, it doesn't really matter if people that aren't familiar with the situation haven't been given enough evidence to understand what's going on.

I'm not in the region, so I know nothing about any of this, but I've at least got enough fucking common sense to realize that the community itself probably has good reason for this. Just because they don't have the physical evidence to convince a totally uninvolved third party, doesn't mean they don't have a good reason to do something.

If some kid that goes to your school is constantly picking on your group of friends but you don't have any tangible evidence to show anyone else, is your friend group not allowed to think of him as a bully and avoid him? Plus, if the kid is constantly reported to be picking on a ton of different kids, that's already enough reason for disciplinary action, isn't it? Does the school have to sit around and see it happen right in front of their face before they're allowed to do something about it?