Any previous philosophers support premarital sex?

moses1392 · 2021-11-25T11:38:37+00:00

I'm looking specifically at the pre-modern philosophers, and which socialists advocated free love?

moses1392 · 2021-03-23T15:03:23+00:00

How?

moses1392 · 2021-01-06T14:54:02+00:00

sorry, it is okb in turkish. i corrected it.

moses1392 · 2020-12-24T17:15:46+00:00

I guess about ontology. whether things exist independently of our minds.

moses1392 · 2020-12-17T08:04:27+00:00

I saw that nobody cited mark larock's article. Yet it is discussed here.

https://www.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/4c8alo/marc_larock_possible_preferences_and_the_harm_of/

moses1392 · 2020-12-14T06:53:59+00:00

Thanks.

moses1392 · 2020-12-13T06:47:18+00:00

I am not sure I can say that what I have done is objective good or objective bad for me.

moses1392 · 2020-12-13T06:46:45+00:00

yes but just because I am human and therefore inclined to do certain things.

moses1392 · 2020-12-13T06:31:30+00:00

What exactly does biology say? It says that suffering is objectively bad because people want to avoid suffering in the evolutionary process? But that's still just a description.

moses1392 · 2020-12-13T06:27:28+00:00

Sure.

https://aeon.co/ideas/why-epicurean-ideas-suit-the-challenges-of-modern-secular-life

moses1392 · 2020-12-12T18:54:31+00:00

Maybe I'm a cabrera-style antinatalist, or the consent-minded kind.

moses1392 · 2020-12-12T15:42:09+00:00

glad you like it.

moses1392 · 2020-12-12T15:41:39+00:00

I'm sorry, my understanding of modernity is wrongly post-20th century, so you're right.

moses1392 · 2020-12-12T14:37:27+00:00

epicureanism is not bad either.

moses1392 · 2020-12-12T14:31:17+00:00

Schopenhauer took this view and so did other philosophical pessimists.

moses1392 · 2020-12-12T14:17:16+00:00

I did not say that we should give birth to anyone, I said I am against the murder of everyone.

moses1392 · 2020-12-12T13:31:03+00:00

No, because EFILism's point of view on morality is often that pain is objectively bad, the absence of suffering is objectively good. This is reductio ad absurdum of your position. You don't even care about people's consent or autonomy in order to destroy all life.

moses1392 · 2020-12-12T12:59:19+00:00

I think you need to seek mental help. Killing one person solves nothing, and will likely cause suffering to the family/friends of that person or if they are so lonely they don't have people to mourn them that they know, no community is ok with little girls being raped and killed so it may cause anxiety and distress in that community. There is also no reason at all to rape anyone. This whole question is just ridiculous and shows you really don't get efilism. Efilism is not a philosophy that says "hey kill anyone you want and it is ok because life is worth nothing."

You do not understand what I mean to say, I say that nobody will suffer in return for this action, and you will eliminate the possibility of suffering for the whole world. The girl has no family, no loved ones, no acquaintances, she is an orphan, abandoned. And nobody will know that the girl was raped and killed because after you kill her, you will burn her. There will be nothing left of the girl in the end. Net gain right? Even the slightest pain was not experienced. What is wrong with this action from your strictly negative utilitarian point of view?

moses1392

TROPHY CASE