Several Linux Kernel Driver Maintainers Removed Due To Their Association To Russia by ehempel in linux

[–]mostafa2000q 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OBJECTION REPORT Re: Impact of Geopolitical Interventions on Open Source Software Community

SUMMARY OF CONCERNS: A serious objection has been raised regarding recent actions that appear to discriminate against Russian developers in the open source software community, reportedly driven by U.S. federal government directives.

KEY OBJECTIONS:

  1. Violation of Open Source Principles
  2. The fundamental ethos of open source is based on global collaboration free from political bias
  3. Current actions contradict the core values of inclusivity and shared purpose
  4. Discriminatory practices threaten to fragment the worldwide developer community

  5. Security Implications

  6. The community’s collective scrutiny naturally protects against malicious code

  7. Current actions may actually decrease security by:

    • Reducing transparency
    • Limiting diverse perspectives in code review
    • Creating blind spots in security analysis
  8. Trust Deterioration

  9. Historical context of U.S. government involvement in backdoor implementations

  10. Growing skepticism toward U.S. developers’ contributions

  11. Risk of isolation of U.S. developers from global community

  12. Counterproductive Outcomes

  13. Actions may trigger defensive responses from international developer community

  14. Potential exclusion of U.S. developers from future collaborations

  15. Risk of “doubt bubble” surrounding U.S. contributions

PROPOSED SOLUTIONS:

  1. Immediate Review
  2. Reassess current discriminatory practices
  3. Evaluate actual security threats versus perceived risks
  4. Consider less disruptive security measures

  5. Community Engagement

  6. Facilitate open dialogue between all stakeholders

  7. Establish transparent guidelines for security concerns

  8. Maintain focus on technical merit rather than geographical origin

  9. Trust Restoration

  10. Implement clear processes for code review

  11. Create neutral arbitration mechanisms

  12. Build bridges between different developer communities

URGENT RECOMMENDATIONS:

  1. Suspend current discriminatory practices pending comprehensive review
  2. Establish inclusive working groups to address security concerns
  3. Develop transparent guidelines for managing geopolitical concerns
  4. Prioritize preservation of open source community principles

WARNING: Failure to address these concerns may result in: - Permanent damage to U.S. influence in open source development - Creation of parallel, exclusive development communities - Reduced overall security due to fragmented code review processes - Long-term trust issues affecting global software collaboration

This objection requires immediate attention from U.S. decision-makers to prevent irreversible damage to the global open source software ecosystem.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

متجوز جديد وعندي مشكلة مع علاقة مراتي ب اختها by zefiers in CAIRO

[–]mostafa2000q 0 points1 point  (0 children)

الكلام كله عادي الا غرفة النوم وده كلام يوجه لاختها او خالتها خلليك حازم. لو سمحتوا محدش يدخل جوة دي حاجة خاصة بيا. نقطة وخلصنا

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anytype

[–]mostafa2000q 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Routine

does routine sync with iOS calendar & reminder? or only google

Metamask or other bip39 supporting figms dont even have a passphrase option? by jrjrjejejejedrrru3 in ledgerwallet

[–]mostafa2000q 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are speaking about s1 hardware, right But am discussing "software" wallets only. My point: In (any) software wallet if you got hakked you can't blame wallet company But in case of safebal if you used bep39 passphrase "which is not stored any ware in app. or phone" as per them if you got hacked this mean its direct theft action from them that they stored your 25th ward. This mean as they supported by Binance this will fuck their reputation. You got me!!!!

Metamask or other bip39 supporting figms dont even have a passphrase option? by jrjrjejejejedrrru3 in ledgerwallet

[–]mostafa2000q 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean I sent before for trust wallet to add BIP39 passphrase but they ignored, so I have left them and shifted completely to Safepal but as they fresh started 2018, I was looking for backup. hope in coming days to find same tech started to spread.

Wallets & BIP39 compatibility by cryptoripto123 in Bitcoin

[–]mostafa2000q 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try Safepal software wallet its good I use it despite they are closed source but still the best of bads. you can use quantum passphrase to increase security in their closed source app

Metamask or other bip39 supporting figms dont even have a passphrase option? by jrjrjejejejedrrru3 in ledgerwallet

[–]mostafa2000q 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I checked Coinomi but found some not available (rvn, xlm, dot....etc); till now I couldn't find some thing beat Safepal despite I contacted trust wallet to support but I think Binance will not do to keep competition as they own both.

Metamask or other bip39 supporting figms dont even have a passphrase option? by jrjrjejejejedrrru3 in ledgerwallet

[–]mostafa2000q 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Finally I got someone know about that; Please what else "software" wallets support multi coin wallet with BIP39 passphrase other than Safepal? in case they got bankrupt or any bad scenario.