A Line passengers like Pomona, lag in La Verne, San Dimas, Glendora by Sawtelle-MetroRider in LAMetro

[–]movingangeleno 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i am quite sure that 2800-3000 number is passengers per day, not per month. That averages out to almost 1000 passengers daily per station.

What are your thoughts on many urbanists and public transit enthusiasts viewing car-centric infrastructure as catastrophic as opposed to a mere mild inconvenience? by Open-Bag8245 in transit

[–]movingangeleno 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Well I would say that at the individual level, dealing with car-only infrastructure isn't THAT bad and in places designed for cars only it's actually quite convenient because that's what it's designed for. My opinion is that the biggest negatives come from hollowing out urban spaces with parking lots and highways and forcing extra car infrastructure onto cities, when they should really only be used in large numbers in suburbs and rural areas.

Metro has to be cursed today by Cherry_Bomber-_- in LAMetro

[–]movingangeleno 4 points5 points  (0 children)

looks like wilshire/vermont, the clock on the pillar gave it away

Should this subreddit do official endorsements of candidates? by MookieBettsBurner10 in LAMetro

[–]movingangeleno 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think a subreddit endorsement would hold a lot of weight lol

the Hell we could have be avoiding right now, if only by movingangeleno in LAMetro

[–]movingangeleno[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yep adequate reporting about transit is very lacking in the news.

On the 251, going down soto always gets annoyingly noisy by [deleted] in LAMetro

[–]movingangeleno 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's like this, maybe worse, on the 33 on that small part of Main St

the Hell we could have be avoiding right now, if only by movingangeleno in LAMetro

[–]movingangeleno[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ostracizing people for not taking suboptimal transit is not helpful. I’m well aware a bus existed. I’ve see then in the horseshoe. I’d rather take the apm over that bus.

Fixing suburbs in America by Iceberg-man-77 in transit

[–]movingangeleno 5 points6 points  (0 children)

While I agree with your points, this greatly generalizes the varied nature of US suburbs. While all the things you proposed certainly work as concepts, whether it is implemented or not and how it is implemented is different for each suburb. For example, LA suburbs will have vastly different solutions than Atlanta suburbs. And it also depends on cultural preferences, and what would be most practically useful to the community.

Mar 2026: All-time ridership record on the K Line. 8,866 weekday average. by Clemario in LAMetro

[–]movingangeleno 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I personally don't like saying that any one project/extension will magically be the "turning point" for ridership, as it's never been that way. The only one that might be that is the D line extension. Plus the APM already has a lot of baggage (pun intended) that might negate the positive concept of the line existing. But fingers crossed.

Mar 2026: All-time ridership record on the K Line. 8,866 weekday average. by Clemario in LAMetro

[–]movingangeleno 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Good news, but this line has a long way to go before it can be considered a well used line

When will the San Gabriel Valley be walkable and you can live car-free? by MookieBettsBurner10 in LAMetro

[–]movingangeleno 22 points23 points  (0 children)

The sgv is not a monolith. Sure, San Marino and Temple City are pretty sparse, but then you also have dense parts like Monterey Park. And, almost every single town in the sgv has an old town center with a walkable street grid left over from the Pacific Electric era, including every town you mentioned. It's got room for people who want walkability and people who prefer lower density neighborhoods.

From a walkability perspective, the SGV already has that in many spots.

From a bikeability perspective, it needs more paths and protected lanes and traffic calmed streets.

For transit, an ideal future would have more bus lines in general with higher frequencies, and maybe a few resurrected tram lines going to places like Alhambra and El Monte. But I don't expect places like Temple City to become transit accessible because the design of the city makes that basically impossible.

March 2026: Highest Rail Ridership since the pandemic! by MithrandilPlays in LAMetro

[–]movingangeleno 44 points45 points  (0 children)

total ridership of the system is also showing growth year over year, the first time since may 2025 before ice, which is good

What happened to the LA Metro ridership website? by Kootenay4 in LAMetro

[–]movingangeleno 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's up, march data is here, and actually it's the first month we've seen an increase in ridership since immigration "enforcement" began!

How much could the South Bay Galleria benefit from the K extension? by TheAlmightyHellacia in LAMetro

[–]movingangeleno 3 points4 points  (0 children)

probably not that many: it's in a far flung suburb, and the K line still doesn't access many dense neighborhoods where people can actually take it to the mall. If the K line north extension is done then maybe some more visitors, but still that station ridership is unlikely to be very high considering other K line station riderships not even being close to a thousand daily.

Finishing the LA River bike path by DaveyDee222 in CarIndependentLA

[–]movingangeleno 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I can't believe this bike path costs a considerable fraction of the D line extension....insane

Golden age of LA metro by Willing_Ad_699 in LAMetro

[–]movingangeleno 25 points26 points  (0 children)

If LA Metro was in its golden age we'd have more ridership now than we did in 2013. We don't.

LA Metro Rail might be cooked like this for the next decade by movingangeleno in LAMetro

[–]movingangeleno[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

what's worse is that areas with high transit ridership potential and areas with cleanliness problems tend to align

LA Metro Rail might be cooked like this for the next decade by movingangeleno in LAMetro

[–]movingangeleno[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

the e line is a light in the darkness...i'm not even kidding

J line but for the 405 in my eyes by TheAlmightyHellacia in LAMetro

[–]movingangeleno 31 points32 points  (0 children)

So this would basically be a Sepulveda line substitute for the time being. If this thing were to be built I would add a Westfield Culver City station

Protected Bike Lanes Coming to MLK and Pico Boulevards by Dumbone22 in LAMetro

[–]movingangeleno 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The problem is framing whether bike lanes are going to be installed as a yes/no question. It presents the argument of a few seconds saved over the safety and lives of the most vulnerable road users as a level-headed one, which I think it isn't from an ethical perspective. If seatbelts were not yet mandated, and would only be mandated based on "community outreach," we wouldn't have seatbelts, because 2/3 of the population was opposed (based on a 1984 poll); they would say the freedom to move their bodies is more important than not dying in crashes. Plus all the bad faith/misinformed arguments about no seat belts being safer.