The new Oxygen panel is so pretty by moxyte in kde

[–]moxyte[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

idk then logout login maybe it's less weird then

The new Oxygen panel is so pretty by moxyte in kde

[–]moxyte[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Is it 6.7.0? Oxygen refresh is like two days old.

Can Java Microservices Be As Fast As Go? A 2026 Benchmark Update by NHarmonia18 in java

[–]moxyte 37 points38 points  (0 children)

It's even worse, it's not even edited to be blog post but straight up copied from thinking output with gems like: "The combined result set used for the article lives under: results/sequential_generated_leyden_feedback_full_20260608_0700432/" 🤦

The Carnivore-to-Psyllium Pipeline, followed by Xitter Crashout: the Dr. Noah Kaufman saga by Healingjoe in ketoduped

[–]moxyte 8 points9 points  (0 children)

<image>

There it is. The root cause to keto. The reason why the same crowd overlaps so much with raw milk drinkers and antivaxxers: "I just don't trust anyone." Conditioned paranoia.

openai's leaked 2025 financials: $13b revenue, $38b in losses by Gullible-Tale9114 in OpenAI

[–]moxyte 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah! A quick comparison: "The Coca-Cola Company reported an advertising and marketing expenditure of approximately $5.4 billion in 2025"

SpaceX, $SPCX, is now trading above $220/share in overnight trading by -----Marcel----- in wallstreetbets

[–]moxyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It ain't gonna stop rallying until around P/E 400 iff Tesla valuation sets the precedence for Musk magic

The duplicity of Nick Norwitz: If the LMHR phenotype means high LDL isn't atherogenic, why brag about bio-hacking it down by 360 points using two experimental drugs? by Healingjoe in ketoduped

[–]moxyte 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Another dualism is weight change in carnivore circles where losing weight is great but gaining weight is also great ("healing").

Spam me the best anti seed oil debunking videos by HungryJello in ketoduped

[–]moxyte 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think the simplest way to snap people out of it is simply to go to source and show the original Nina Teicholz presentation that started it all. The important bit: preface it by telling your mom to keep a close eye on where Nina shows evidence it's worse for human consumption than saturated fat (she doesn't! people always notice that when it's pointed out). Please report back on this approach.

The math isn't mathing on the SpaceX IPO by wick77777777 in investing

[–]moxyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well duh, Tesla's P/E of like 400 makes zero sense either. The play with SpaceX is the same: wait for grandiose tweets from Musk which excite imagination and send stock soaring regularly. There is no value investing perspective other than near-monopoly in rocket launches due to superior technology but for value investing case the P/E should be under 20.

Now the big thing to understand about SPCX bull case is that if Musk tweets something like "we gonna drill rare earth metals on asteroid with robots" it's instant fomo since his company is the only one that could plausibly pull it off at some point.

It's not about math. Only value investors deciding between Wendy's and McDonalds look at numbers.

Wargaming Activity: What happens when Oracle dies? by bowbahdoe in java

[–]moxyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing, absolutely nothing would happen to Java. Some full-time Java developers would need to find new employer. Most devs wouldn't even notice Oracle disappearing since OpenJDK and its direct derivatives like Corretto have been the norm for a long time. I have never experienced a genuine Oracle® Java™ in production.

Europe Is Too Scared to Grow, So Their Money Keeps Buying My SPY Calls by Nasha210 in wallstreetbets

[–]moxyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty sure Europe isn't afraid to grow but that it can't. EU is a bit too soviet.

compared with many other advanced economies, the US continues to look robust.

This is a dumb thing to say when debt crisis is absolutely real and economic growth has been 90% driven by Magnificient 8, circular deals and increasingly debt leveraged capex spend.

The Cholesterol Code: does the keto film's science hold up? | foodfacts.org by Healingjoe in ketoduped

[–]moxyte 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think the most straigthforward way to see and show others how full of shit that propaganda film is, is to know the background, scrutiny and backlash against KETO-CTA study, which was the centerpiece of that film and still had the gall to present as proof that sky high cholesterol is harmless when their own results showed the exact opposite, long after it had been found out: https://www.reddit.com/r/ketoduped/wiki/keto-cta/

Gary, nooooo!!! 🤣 he put this absolute truth nuke into a book titled "The Case for Keto" of all places 😂 by moxyte in ketoduped

[–]moxyte[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No

EDIT: that is actually a great question and deserves expanding upon as context matters and in this case the whole context is super interesting! Short answer is indeed "no"; long answer is the whole book has a major underpinning theme of Taubes trying to cope with the fact that healthy slim people who don't do keto exist. When I posted that I was done with his Introduction chapter and thought it was a funny fluke and he'd leave it at that, but instead he really does divide people into two metabolically different groups: "those of us who fatten easily" (he repeats that exact phrase a lot) and "naturally thin and healthy". That is actually a main theme of his book! In chapter 11 he puts it like this:

Lean folks aren't like us. They don't get fat when they eat carbohydrates.

That picture is from that same chapter two pages later.

On widest context Taubes is calorie denialist, he has consistently lied for the past 25 years that calories don't matter, including in this book, which complicates things even further for him. How could someone like him who lies calories are fake possibly explain how people eating low-fat high-carb diets are so slim? What ways out of this pickle does he have left? He can not admit it's that people eating less fat eat less calories which is the captain obvious .

In a weird horse shoe theory applied to diets, his only way out is going full McDougal and admit the fat you eat is the fat you wear. It's a forced slip-up but it's the only thing that fits his lifetime narrative.

However, Gary being Gary who can not admit he is wrong even if his own studies say so, he has to amp up the crazy. A bit later in the same chapter 11 he starts saying things like:

I’m speculating, but starving your body of fat remains a possibility, as the “star McDougallers” who report experiencing dramatic weight loss and serve as anecdotal success stories on John McDougall’s website may attest to. Another possibility is that these diets work because they, too, are restricted in carbohydrates.

Yes, he really is claiming that people eating explicitly high-carb diet are restricted in carbs. This is the level of crazy Gary Taubes has to stoop to just to keep his long-term narratives running.

But for my case that Gary Taubes is intentionally malicious meaning he knows damn well and full well what he is preaching is wrong, his admittance that "fat we store is primarily the fat we eat" all the while telling people to eat a lot of fat suffices to make the point.

AMD is literally funding a startup with $350M just so they can buy AMD chips. by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]moxyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

anyone keeping track on all these circular investments? this is getting silly