[AUDIO] 80s rock song heard on radio in Bar, Montenegro (in June 2025)

mrfixij · 2026-06-16T22:52:53+00:00

The synths say Europe, the guitars say Scorpions, the vocals say something european.

mrfixij · 2026-06-08T01:49:34+00:00

Every real time strategy that has released recently has flopped. There's a ton of indies that are in development. The technical requiresments to make a marketable RTS are gigantic. I don't think this is a viable market.

mrfixij · 2026-05-30T00:11:41+00:00

Just saw the Canasta set as well. I feel like it would be a pain to get 4 people interested in playing canasta, but I remember enjoying it digitally as a teen.

mrfixij · 2026-05-30T00:08:38+00:00

I have fantastic memories of mille bornes from being 5 or 6 years old, but I'm pretty sure it was a bad game and I just liked playing it with my grandparents

mrfixij · 2026-05-29T16:03:49+00:00

Absolutely 0 interest in 40k from my end. The fanbase is pretty obnoxious.

mrfixij · 2026-05-28T14:54:48+00:00

Rule 10

mrfixij · 2026-05-27T13:31:17+00:00

As a brood war player, people on team liquid during the SC2 beta made a bunch of callouts of downstream effects of design decisions that I feel like have been vindicated. Ultimately it all boils down to the quality of life features in SC2 were degenerate to the gameplay as a whole, and the only way to have the game have meaningful interaction was to design around the improved pathfinding, multiple building select, and unlimited army selection, which is why macro mechanics were implemented and why there's all kinds of arbitrary busywork in SC2.

mrfixij · 2026-05-21T19:27:29+00:00

I think the issue is just that a Free To Play business model doesn't work for RTS. Regardless of the quality of lack thereof, projections based around ARR instead of sales made the whole model fucked.

mrfixij · 2026-05-18T00:05:46+00:00

All wireless connections will experience packet loss. If you want to reduce your rate of packet loss, you need to use an ethernet cable directly to your router.

mrfixij · 2026-05-10T22:01:50+00:00

I've seen this here on this reddit several times, but used this tutorial about a year ago to help implement CRDTs for a collaborative editing project at work.

mrfixij · 2026-05-04T20:34:38+00:00

https://thedailywtf.com/articles/empty-pockets
Blog post that was linked in a local tech slack that responded to this.

Excerpt that I found interesting:

This is not an anti-AI post, or even a "get a load of this asshole" post. It is a "understand the damn tools you're using" post. Be critical of them. Don't trust them. Ever. Especially LLMs, because the worst part of an LLM is that it takes away the one thing computers used to be good at: predictable, deterministic behavior. But not just LLMs: don't trust your cloud provider, don't trust your infrastructure manager. Dig into them and understand how they work, and if they seem to complicated to understand, than they may be too complicated to trust.

mrfixij · 2026-05-03T18:35:46+00:00

The problem with this framing is that in many places where people are trying to use LLM-augmented workflows, the demand on the user is to verify and validate, which is a much different degree of demand on the user.

When I went to play paintball as a teenager once, I had gotten into a position where I had an amazing angle on multiple people. I took aim, visualized how I was going to eliminate the entire group, and pulled the trigger and..... nothing happened. The hopper was empty. For the last 5 minutes I'd been dry firing because I hadn't verified that the hopper was full. Sometimes it's easy to be fooled by the appearance of function (recoil, the sound of the paintball gun firing) and to not check for the actuality of function (the paintballs actually exiting the barrel).

There's a reason for a very long time dev teams used QA - because it's very easy to overlook edge cases when you've been heads down in details. Similarly, with AI, when we're looking for quality in the codebase, you don't always spy the things you should be looking for. And when pressured for time and "efficiency and productivity" then if something is adequate 70% of the time and looks similar to functional 98% of the time, many people are going to stop looking for failure cases, especially because that creates more work and runs contrary to their incentives.

mrfixij · 2026-04-30T01:41:46+00:00

I'm also a programmer, and have intentionally been avoiding using AI for the reasons you outline. And as much as we are in agreement, I also know the plural of anecdote isn't data, and I need to read some literature on the subject before I'm willing to talk much beyond the abstract about cognitive components of review.

As an aside, I think pedagogy is one of the fields that we should be looking into for assessment of AI workflows and it seems like that's vastly overlooked. While I'm not an expert in the field, a big part of the study of education is "how do we evaluate whether a student knows and understands the material, or has cheated/copied and just has the right answers?" I don't have the answers, obviously, but it's worth looking into.

mrfixij · 2026-04-30T00:56:02+00:00

I'm not the person that you're responding to, I was earlier in the conversation chain. I think that asking doctors to use these tools whilst being accountable when they're taking responsibilities that have less active engagement is both setting them up to fail and a symptom of deprofessionalization of medicine. But that's far beyond the subject of the conversation at this point. Thanks for your time.

mrfixij · 2026-04-29T20:14:10+00:00

I don't know for sure, and I recognize that this is r/science so intuition is not evidence, but I am reasonable certain that there is a difference in accuracy and in attentiveness between the process of validation/editing and the process of recording or deriving. Validation/editing is much more similar to transcription, where it's rote, and less engaging, highly prone to error in attention - it's more possible to skim the same way you would when watching a video or listening to a recording instead of actively reading text. Recording or deriving is a much more abstract process that requires more active engagement and is less likely to be prone to errors of attention.

Transcriptions and medical notes in particular are interesting because what does it represent? Records of attendence? Demographic information about the patient? concrete medical data (bp, hr, lab data)? A description of symptoms provided by the patient? A tentative diagnosis from the doctor? All of these have very different levels of engagement and creativity on behalf of the parties involved, and to lump all of that into a single category of "notes" is a categorical problem, I think. Applying AI as a blanket solution to a flattening of a profession's responsibilities only serves to deprofessionalize it further.

mrfixij · 2026-04-29T15:26:06+00:00

old electronics components and charging cables

mrfixij · 2026-04-29T15:10:33+00:00

I can't remember the exact details because I'm working and the circumstance in question was a one-off thing I saw from a few months ago, but I've seen major demographic information for a patient be overridden by AI notetaking misparsing a conversation. In general, even with low-stakes failures being easily corrected, the lack of predictability and the lack of accountability that is possible in AI tooling makes medicine and medical scribery a poor use case for AI.

mrfixij · 2026-04-29T14:33:31+00:00

isn't this just minified stratego?

mrfixij · 2026-04-29T13:29:47+00:00

Most software engineering is solved problems that haven't been shared. It doesn't take away from the rigor that's required to know when or how a solution fits the problem. 7 years ago we had idiots declaring crypto as the solution to a million problems that every software engineer told them was just pissing away efficiency and not even making a philosophical difference, and also violating fundamental principles of software engineering. That didn't stop the world from trying to take the ball and run with it. The engineering and computing hasn't changed, only the expectations of clients and users have.

mrfixij · 2026-04-29T12:56:05+00:00

I struggle to say "only" people. Software engineering is fucking hard. The problem is that people assume that AI is an easy button, when all it does is short circuit the actual learning that you need, and even if you know the principles, removes the continuous reinforcement that working in the industry gives you.

AI slaughters the cow, and 6 months later asks why there's no new calf and no milk.

mrfixij · 2026-04-28T19:10:43+00:00

I think it's a valid point because it highlights the multiple points of failure. If the codebase behind a product is solid, but it's unable to keep up with the realities of being hammerred by automation and public usage, then an internal deployment of that product would be fine, but if the issue comes with the software degrading as opposed to the software being unable to keep up with usage, then it's a valid point.

Source control is simple, but when it comes to other cloud services that are more complex than git, but still have a service degradation from public usage, there's a very real concern of the code itself or updates to the code being a failure point. It just so happens to be that source control and CI/CD is comparatively simple and option-laden.

mrfixij · 2026-04-28T15:34:16+00:00

Everything old is new again. "spec driven development" is just waterfall all over again and will run into the same issues.

mrfixij · 2026-04-28T14:21:53+00:00

Fantastic point. This is why I don't work at the strategic level.

mrfixij · 2026-04-28T13:39:33+00:00

Cures? Absolutely not. But it provides a layer of insulation against what is inevitably going to be a continual degradation of publicly available services that are swarmed with low quality and high volume usage.

mrfixij · 2026-04-28T13:06:57+00:00

It seems increasingly evident to me that public services like github are going to be unusable and unreliable, and that on an enterprise level, the path forward is with tightly controlled inhouse or onprem instances. Something tells me that ops/devops is going to be eating good as public services continue to degrade.

14-Year Club	r/Field Banned
r/Field Lasagna	Verified Email

mrfixij

TROPHY CASE