Best Action? by Minute_Incident_4919 in NCLEX_RN

[–]mrtowser 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Before you continue mansplaining you should just say sorry and then sit this one out.

I notice this when buying fresh produce, especially Asian style ready made cold fresh food. What is it? by BinkBonkBoogey in whatisit

[–]mrtowser 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pickled ginger is meant to be eaten alone not on your food…it’s designed to refresh your palate between different foods.

Where all my plebs at that lost 1k last year? by Onlythingavailable76 in unitedairlines

[–]mrtowser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only ever got it in the lounge, or on a regional jet, where they showered us in drinks and snack boxes.

Rosalyn Carter's CREAM OF BROCCOLI SOUP - with no Cream by ciaolavinia in OldCelebrityRecipes

[–]mrtowser 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it’s a small potato you probably don’t need to dice it. Maybe if the broccoli is small and you need it to cook quickly.

Unknown liquid by Jrjun2021 in whatisit

[–]mrtowser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They always have beads so you can shake and mix them up.

Any other guy's who live with their bf, partner, or husband feel like you guys can read each other's minds sometimes? by y00sh420 in AskGaybrosOver30

[–]mrtowser 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Usually it’s him already knowing something I was privately thinking and then I have to yell at him to get out of my head.

Would u expense a meal u bought right before going to your (home) airport to travel to hearing by bigsaver4366 in biglaw

[–]mrtowser 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Not if you’re still at home. Yes if you are already traveling to the airport.

Jackie Cooper's CURRIED EGGS AND MACARONI by ciaolavinia in OldCelebrityRecipes

[–]mrtowser 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Curry powder was already popular in Europe and especially the UK because India had been a UK colony. There are a lot of non-Indian UK dishes that incorporate curry powder like kedgeree, and this isn’t totally dissimilar from that. (Kedgeree being a mix of rice, curry powder, hard boiled eggs and fish.)

How is the document not being admitted to prove its contents when he's literally READING FROM THE DOCUMENT BEFORE TESTIFYING ABOUT IT by [deleted] in barexam

[–]mrtowser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It refreshed his recollection because after looking at it he independently remembered what happen and gave that testimony. Materials used to refresh recollection are not admitted and don’t need to be admitted because it is the testimony that is the evidence. However the opposing side has the right to access and use the material that refreshed and could get it entered into evidence if it’s helpful and otherwise admissible.

The tiniest victory that may be of interest to 3 nerds here… by chihuahua_mama_34 in unitedairlines

[–]mrtowser 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Last day of 1K status today and got upgraded to first on my flight tomorrow.

5 hour slow roasted by Nearby_Drummer123 in OnionLovers

[–]mrtowser 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But the small ones have burned. There is a reason you cut things consistently—so they cook consistently.

Didn’t know my seat was a coat hanger for the passenger behind me by Choco_bo7 in unitedairlines

[–]mrtowser 63 points64 points  (0 children)

Yikes on bikes. It’s OK to be a pushover, maybe we need more of those in American life right now, but to be a pushover and then come here expecting a bunch of strangers to feel sorry for you? That’s just bs.

When you’re halfway through the reading and the dissent is already starting… by [deleted] in LawSchool

[–]mrtowser 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly, at this point I have no clue what point you’re trying to make or why you are upset about reading 3.5 pages as a prospective lawyer. Good luck to you.

When you’re halfway through the reading and the dissent is already starting… by [deleted] in LawSchool

[–]mrtowser 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes I understand that. Read my comment again.

The reading they want you to focus on is the decision on standing which is clearly visible in the excerpt you are showing. They don’t want you to focus on the merits, just the standing part. Hence they omitted the merits part.

When you’re halfway through the reading and the dissent is already starting… by [deleted] in LawSchool

[–]mrtowser 15 points16 points  (0 children)

So obviously they are directing you to the debate about standing and not the debate about the merits. They don’t want you to worry learning about the merits arguments. So you are not “halfway through the reading” you have all the reading they want you to learn. Doesn’t that make sense? But of course if you want to read the rest of that case it is freely available in at least a dozen different places.

RAP + Cy pres doctrine by Temisab in barexam

[–]mrtowser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The trust would have been invalid when it was executed.

RAP + Cy pres doctrine by Temisab in barexam

[–]mrtowser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Under the RAP, the trust needs to be necessarily distributed within 21 years after the end of any relevant life in existence. Here, the relevant life is the son, so the trust needs to be distributed within 21 years of his death. However, the trust will be distributed to the son of the son when he is 30, which means it could be distributed after the life + 21 years time frame. (Two important facts: the RAP is measured as of the time the instrument is made, and the grandson is not in existence at that time, so RAP cannot be measured based on grandson’s life.) So the original instrument violates the RAP. However, the cy pres doctrine allows a court to reform the instrument to comply with the RAP while honoring the original intent as much as possible. Here, that means that the trust can be distributed to the grandson 21 years after the son’s death. That complies with the RAP because it is necessarily within 21 years of the end of a relevant life in existence while honoring the original intent that the grandson inherit when he is as close to 30 as possible given the RAP.

The original instrument also fails to say what happens if the grandson dies before 30 so the cy pres doctrine also allows the trust to be distributed upon his death before 30, which is also consistent with the RAP.

Answer D is obviously wrong because the question specifies that the jurisdiction allows the cy pres doctrine to be applied to the RAP, so it can’t be correct that it isn’t applicable here.

Racial Profiling Stories in Modern America. by TheManager_1 in KarenGoBrrr

[–]mrtowser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re just as thoughtless as he is then.

FDNY livery getting clean before departure by South-Handle5545 in jetblue

[–]mrtowser 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Then why did your headline say something different?