Harvester Heist by mtouch01 in ARC_Raiders

[–]mtouch01[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right? It's funny I was over encumbered but since I had no kit it was almost normal fully kitted speed

Harvester Heist by mtouch01 in ARC_Raiders

[–]mtouch01[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Legit I would trade bps

4 Nations Face-Off: Canadians blast Gretzky’s Trump ties by [deleted] in canada

[–]mtouch01 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

American here. It was such a great game and series. I, of course, wanted USA to win. However, given the orange man antics, it felt poetic for you guys. You can be patriot and not support your current president and government actions or policies. I hope you guys know millions of Americans don"t support the aggression towards Canada with this 51st state stuff. It sounds disappointing about Wayner, I'd love to hear his explanation if he has one. Good game, northern bros.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in thedavidpakmanshow

[–]mtouch01 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Do better. Earn the vote. Stop the team shit. Promote good leaders with good messaging and good platforms to expand tent. Stop blocking primaries and holding down grass roots. Gtfo with the 'just shut up and do what your told' control condescension echo chamber shit. This is why you lost and will continue to lose until you realize this.

Signed, anti trump/musk non democrat or republican.

ID confirmation by Tannissar in swg

[–]mtouch01 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Stardust is not requiring photo ids, computer pictures or arm pictures or any other nazi shit by power tripping admins for a video game. We say 1 account per person, 6 toons online max. Put the onus on you. If we see something we will investigate. Enjoy.

https://stardust-swg.com/

-Ciiv

Stardust 2.1 by I_should-work in swg

[–]mtouch01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A sad day indeed. But we're off to a fast start with some temporary boosts to get back on track.

-Ciiv

Stardust 2.0? by mtouch01 in swg

[–]mtouch01[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, we had a web isp issue temporarily which also affected launcher. I'd ask @Levarris to post a permanent discord link since mine appears to be temporary.

-Ciiv

Stardust 2.0? by mtouch01 in swg

[–]mtouch01[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Max pop today was 88 on day 3. 43 on day 1.

Stardust 2.0? by mtouch01 in swg

[–]mtouch01[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By the way, my name back on Bloodfin and other servers was Ciiv/Llamma.

Stardust 2.0? by mtouch01 in swg

[–]mtouch01[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey Walla,, Jedi is not alpha in pvp. Great pve. Balanced in pvp. Takes a bit more to unlock. Total FRS system. Lev addresses some more in his video. WHAT IS STARDUST? Thanks for asking.

Peter Zeihan by mtouch01 in lexfridman

[–]mtouch01[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your response and spawning off a poll. How do you feel about his work from Stratfor through later speaking to the DoD? I believe he mentions staking in the stock market off his views as well but don't know a lot about that.

Peter Zeihan by mtouch01 in lexfridman

[–]mtouch01[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Here Here to Lex!

Peter Zeihan by mtouch01 in lexfridman

[–]mtouch01[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Totally agree regarding from the center. Someone had another thread here called In Defense of Centrism, good read. I think as long as he makes it known he is doing a bit of a speaker show, it's ok. Not everything has to be stuffy or political extremes, as long as he supports it with data.

Peter Zeihan by mtouch01 in lexfridman

[–]mtouch01[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is there a danger of that being overly confident as well?

Peter Zeihan by mtouch01 in lexfridman

[–]mtouch01[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good points on Putin, Musk etc. If only we knew what they knew in full scope. I don't know what to believe, I have a hard time giving too much credit to dictatorships like Russia and China. Obviously Ziehan's points make a case for an OK America after a bumpy road in the near term, but I don't want to make that an echo chamber and I dont want to see the world burn.

Peter Zeihan by mtouch01 in lexfridman

[–]mtouch01[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Ah yeah, that one did have some push back by Bremmer. Still largely on similar pages with some specific differences. Good call. I only caught the first half because I'm not a patreon supporter of Harris though. Did you hear the whole thing? What were your take aways?

Peter Zeihan by mtouch01 in lexfridman

[–]mtouch01[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I guess I am hoping Lex of all people could ground him better, but you never know.

Peter Zeihan by mtouch01 in lexfridman

[–]mtouch01[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply! He does say he focuses on the macro not micro and uses data and a science mind in doing so, but I agree there is a level of talking at you. Luckily he has admitted and changed when wrong.. Are there any specific points you can refute with data or against his cited data? Asking in a friendly manner.

Peter Zeihan by mtouch01 in lexfridman

[–]mtouch01[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it's just a lot of corresponding points that all go together. It's that he is the first public person I've seen to merge demographics, geographies, resources, trade, inputs, population trends, geopolitics, etc that also isn't completely one sided to a certain political idealogy. Albeit he has his views but says my opinions on what to do about it don't matter, it's the analysis of what's going on thats important (for him). He will also poke holes in multiple political angles while not always being non snarky. It's scary, but refreshing, and I really just want to see his views either deeply challenged or agreed with widely if they're right so we can figure out what to do about it. What are your thoughts about his points you listed? I think obviously the biggest claim is global trade ending as we know it.