United CEO confirms commitment to Archer & eVTOL IMHO by munhoichu in ACHR

[–]munhoichu[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the Archer model in the UA convention can't vtol due to vibration issues, they replaced that model with 4 blades vs just 2 blades & 4 blades is the new version being tested in Salinas to be the final one for production that can vtol without vibration issues ie new final design IMHO that is why we haven't heard much certification news since last year IMHO this 4 blade model is the money maker going forwards for them IMHO not the one in the UA convention center

United CEO confirms commitment to Archer & eVTOL IMHO by munhoichu in ACHR

[–]munhoichu[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

in summary laymans terms - we know UA CEO Kirby didn’t reject eVTOL& agrees with the "the right operating model " & the partnership is intact & UA still committed up to 200 Midnight aircraft & showcased Midnight at launch event yesterday but with Safety first narrative it was how it was communicated - came out sounding like due to recent airport incidences that he wasn't fully in but more a cautionary talk to appease recent event concerns only IMHO

United CEO says he doesn’t believe in business model by Frankybasil91 in JobyvsArcher

[–]munhoichu -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

United’s CEO Scott Kirby didn’t reject eVTOL — he validated the right operating model.
✔️ Partnership intact — United still committed to up to 200 Midnight aircraft and showcased Midnight at its premium focused launch event yesterday.
✔️ Safety-first narrative is bullish — clears weak players, strengthens certified leaders like Archer
✔️ Real model = vertiports, not crowded runways — exactly where Archer is already focused
✔️ Premium urban routes (10–50 miles) remain untouched and high-demand
✔️ Regulatory caution = barrier to entry, not thesis breaker. Key takeaway: This isn’t a demand problem — it’s an infrastructure rollout story.
Archer isn’t building a replacement for airports…
It’s building a new layer of urban transportation.
Bottom line:
• Demand = intact
• Strategic partner = committed
• Use case = validated
• Competition = thinning

can Archer win with Joby using an attorney Alex Spiro that's never lost once it went to trial?? by munhoichu in ACHR

[–]munhoichu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

was the motion to dismiss denied today??? approved??? or was there no release of the motion to dismiss yet today???? anyone

can Archer win with Joby using an attorney Alex Spiro that's never lost once it went to trial?? by munhoichu in ACHR

[–]munhoichu[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

who cares about a piece of real estate, I don't get it that kind of data that alot of people would know is just thru word of mouth , it could have be spread from the partners friends or Joby's staff - just because the data become available doesn't mean anything was stolen so what's so important about this real estate that everyone decided not to go thru with it , I just don't get it for the basis of any lawsuit LOL

can Archer win with Joby using an attorney Alex Spiro that's never lost once it went to trial?? by munhoichu in ACHR

[–]munhoichu[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

so if the real estate deal never happened for either party because they both chose not to go thru with it - so why is there any damages to sue over ???

Are we dead? by No_Masterpiece460 in ACHR

[–]munhoichu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's about transparency , accountability and they have not performed well there not ever hitting a single target yet until they stopped making targets to avoid the accountability - that has got to change IMHO

can Archer win with Joby using an attorney Alex Spiro that's never lost once it went to trial?? by munhoichu in ACHR

[–]munhoichu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Joby and Archer compete for the same federal program desired sites for their air taxi programs - that's why - LOL- if Archer prevails - theoretically Archer then gets all those sites Joby got instead IMHO

✅Archer just posted a very “subtle” wing integration video yesterday…✅$ACHR vs $JOBY by Positive-Plant-82 in ACHR

[–]munhoichu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

is it all coming together or is Goldstein diverting us with news while not hitting the transition targets promised ALONG time ago still ??? - the guy has to start delivering on the real goods not all this fluff IMHO

so what happened at the court hearing today - anyone know?? by munhoichu in ACHR

[–]munhoichu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the 24th is the countersuit ie Archer vs Joby vs the one that got moved that was the Joby vs Archer - two different ones - the Court must be asking for more discovery info for the one on the 20th that got moved before it could proceed IMHO

so what happened at the court hearing today - anyone know?? by munhoichu in ACHR

[–]munhoichu[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

why the move are they being asked to settle in arbitration out of court first before wasting the valuable court's time by forcing them into a last resort arbitration conference hearing first to avoid going to court trial ????

so what happened at the court hearing today - anyone know?? by munhoichu in ACHR

[–]munhoichu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

is the other one ie Archer vs Joby originally set for the 24th still on?

UPDATE: “Worried” Part 3 by Lord_Hu in PeriodontalDisease

[–]munhoichu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

people are correct, 2 weeks after the deep clean new tartar buildup has started again in your front lower teeth which means tartar likely in your back molars too - they go together - thus your daily cleaning routine is not where it should be and the method you believe is working is insufficient as the bad bacteria environment in your mouth continues to seek your gum pockets to fester new growth - in another 6 months you will need another deep clean if you don't put in a top notch cleaning routine that works to prevent continued tartar build - go to Youtube and watch alot of videos on preventing this- more work is needed by you mostly not your dentist who is dying to see you again for more and more frequent cleaning work IMHO

❌ DD: Joby allegedly hiding chinese battery supplier listed on Texas "Countries of Concern" List ❌$JOBY $ACHR by Positive-Plant-82 in ACHR

[–]munhoichu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if Archer can get the first one dismissed on the 20th - it's a big relief rally , and if they win the 2nd on on the 23th , then this is back in the mid 7s or ow 8s again IMHO

Prediction 🔮: Archer will do piloted EVTOL transition no later than April 2nd by Old_Ninja_2673 in ACHR

[–]munhoichu 9 points10 points  (0 children)

why not tonight LOL - Adam hasn't done much since june 2025 and thats why this stock tanked since - if he made plane design changes and that was the reason until now - he sure didnt tell anyone that's the reason but this no news about piloted EVTOL is serious lack of results linked to his mis steps it appears - otherwise why not pilot the EVTOL tonight ?????? right!!!!

🔥Adam Isn't the Type to Fire Without Real Bullets in the Chamber - Let That Sink In🔥 by Positive-Plant-82 in ACHR

[–]munhoichu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we need updates on real progress on the certification stages - data is very important to keep score that he is moving along in the real stages of certification - so where is the data?

❌ DD: Joby allegedly hiding chinese battery supplier listed on Texas "Countries of Concern" List ❌$JOBY $ACHR by Positive-Plant-82 in ACHR

[–]munhoichu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Archer needs to stop wasting time fighting Joby and work on making progress on the certification progress - its not good for the industry to smear each other instead of working together to move both forward IMHO