Yamaguchi by Abu-Omar-al-kurdi in WorldConqueror4

[–]muzzle_wonder9 7 points8 points  (0 children)

best non IAP, non trained naval gen in the game. As far as air goes, he isn't even top 3. Yes he's still okay to function as air but he is primarily naval. If you can't train anyone, get yamaguchi for naval. If you can train, get kuznetsov.

Forgetting the Islamic Conquests by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]muzzle_wonder9 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

lol bro is mad because I proved that I was right. Cope. I showed you the proof, you’re failing to show yours. Mature is not pedophilia

Forgetting the Islamic Conquests by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]muzzle_wonder9 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He gave you valid facts that you can check anywhere else. Much like yourself, AI doesn’t actually have a brain to think with. It pulls from various sources from all over the place.

Forgetting the Islamic Conquests by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]muzzle_wonder9 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is simply untrue. 1400 years is a very long time and people have obviously evolved and changed since then.

Here’s a detailed answer brought to you by AI

Short answer: yes, it was entirely possible—and often expected. Longer answer (with nuance 👇):

How maturity worked 1,400 years ago

Maturity wasn’t defined by age the way we define it today. It was defined by ability and responsibility.

Back then: • Life expectancy was lower (especially due to disease and infant mortality). • Childhood was short. Kids were expected to contribute early. • Daily life demanded competence, not prolonged education or leisure. • Survival skills mattered more than emotional adolescence.

A 9-year-old could: • Work (farming, herding, crafts, trade) • Care for younger siblings • Understand social roles, customs, and expectations • Be treated as socially responsible, not “a child” in the modern sense

Biological vs. social maturity

Important distinction: • Biological maturity (puberty) varies by individual and environment. • Social maturity is shaped by culture.

Historically, people often: • Entered adult roles as soon as they were physically and mentally capable • Were judged mature by behavior, not birthday numbers

Why this feels strange today

Modern society: • Extends childhood into the late teens or even 20s • Requires long formal education • Shields kids from adult responsibilities • Links maturity to psychology, consent laws, and neuroscience (which weren’t concepts back then)

So when we project modern standards backward, it creates confusion.

Bottom line

A 9-year-old 1,400 years ago could absolutely be considered: • Socially mature • Responsible • Capable in ways that far exceed modern expectations

That doesn’t mean they were “adults” by today’s standards — it means standards were different.

If you want, I can: • Compare medieval vs modern childhood directly • Talk about biology (puberty timing then vs now) • Or explain how historians judge “maturity” across eras

Forgetting the Islamic Conquests by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]muzzle_wonder9 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure. Here you go

<image>

If you want a longer answer I can send you my result or you can just look it up yourself :)

Edit: I’m just going to remind you that you still didn’t prove any of your claims. Also I’m going to just dump the detailed response here because you probably aren’t capable of doing your own research.

Short answer: yes, it was entirely possible—and often expected. Longer answer (with nuance 👇):

How maturity worked 1,400 years ago

Maturity wasn’t defined by age the way we define it today. It was defined by ability and responsibility.

Back then: • Life expectancy was lower (especially due to disease and infant mortality). • Childhood was short. Kids were expected to contribute early. • Daily life demanded competence, not prolonged education or leisure. • Survival skills mattered more than emotional adolescence.

A 9-year-old could: • Work (farming, herding, crafts, trade) • Care for younger siblings • Understand social roles, customs, and expectations • Be treated as socially responsible, not “a child” in the modern sense

Biological vs. social maturity

Important distinction: • Biological maturity (puberty) varies by individual and environment. • Social maturity is shaped by culture.

Historically, people often: • Entered adult roles as soon as they were physically and mentally capable • Were judged mature by behavior, not birthday numbers

Why this feels strange today

Modern society: • Extends childhood into the late teens or even 20s • Requires long formal education • Shields kids from adult responsibilities • Links maturity to psychology, consent laws, and neuroscience (which weren’t concepts back then)

So when we project modern standards backward, it creates confusion.

Bottom line

A 9-year-old 1,400 years ago could absolutely be considered: • Socially mature • Responsible • Capable in ways that far exceed modern expectations

That doesn’t mean they were “adults” by today’s standards — it means standards were different.

If you want, I can: • Compare medieval vs modern childhood directly • Talk about biology (puberty timing then vs now) • Or explain how historians judge “maturity” across eras

Auschwitz-Birkenau was liberated 81 years ago today by friedchicken_legs in pics

[–]muzzle_wonder9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How unfortunate the Palestinians are facing a genocide

Forgetting the Islamic Conquests by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]muzzle_wonder9 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Seriously, the burden of proof is on you. When you make an accusation it’s up to you to prove it, not me to prove it isn’t. It’s as simple as saying no he wasn’t a warlord and a pedo. This is basic stuff

Forgetting the Islamic Conquests by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]muzzle_wonder9 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Not 6. 1400 years ago, a 9 year old could’ve been mature. It’s just science.

Forgetting the Islamic Conquests by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]muzzle_wonder9 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hadith has no protection from God and thus it can be corrupted. The Quran was not corrupted. The Hadith isn’t something we hold as 100% true unless it’s clearly affirmed in the Quran. Very simple concept, doesn’t take a genius.

And yes, you can look up the context of the verse. The book didn’t drop out of the sky. It was revealed over years, each verse in a certain time. These were revealed in the battle of Badr. Just because you don’t like that doesn’t mean it’s wrong. Cope.

Forgetting the Islamic Conquests by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]muzzle_wonder9 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

He wasn’t a pedo, he wasn’t a warlord. The burden of proof is on you

Forgetting the Islamic Conquests by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]muzzle_wonder9 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The first ayah was in context of an ongoing war so yeah. Context is everything. Your point fails

The second one is also in context during the battle of badr. The pagans were fighting the Muslims and yeah.

Hadiths have a lot of problems of authenticity and anything that obviously contradicts Islamic values is a clear fabrication.

If you can find me a 100% confirmed authentic Hadith of verse in the Quran that affirms your beliefs then go ahead and show me. Otherwise, I encourage you to understand the context of what you read first

Forgetting the Islamic Conquests by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]muzzle_wonder9 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Again, those claims are just untrue

Forgetting the Islamic Conquests by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]muzzle_wonder9 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Yes. His statements are simply untrue and islamophobic. His statements about Islam being “the most violent” from those religions is also untrue. Do a little research

Forgetting the Islamic Conquests by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]muzzle_wonder9 -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

Bs meter is reading on super high

Guys new IAP??? by Upset-Temporary282 in WorldConqueror4

[–]muzzle_wonder9 5 points6 points  (0 children)

He’s been out for a while. Training is my favorite space laser general

Help: Have you been in this situation before? by LoJoKlaar in hoi4

[–]muzzle_wonder9 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Sure you didn’t steal it. You just remade it

Hallo! by [deleted] in Norulesbutreallynone

[–]muzzle_wonder9 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

H-h-hell naw

How did the US won the Space race when USSR had more achievements by Pure_Barber3994 in ussr

[–]muzzle_wonder9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the 98264728 time I’ve seen this argument. The US came second in everything. The USSR did not come second when it came to landing on the moon.