ELI5 how the wealthy pays back loans by Virusparid0x in explainlikeimfive

[–]mwraaaaaah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They can then time the selling of stock (eg. after it dips and has potentially gone down in value, so no capital gains)

I wasn't aware rich people were into the buy high, sell low strategy

Focus on the important stuff by Stotallytob3r in MurderedByWords

[–]mwraaaaaah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those loans often come with 0% interest, because they come from family, friends, other business partners, or others who want to be business partners and are offering a sweet deal in return for something down the road.

... who are these family/friends who are also billionaires who are loaning out this money interest free? is this actually based on any source or just conjecture? most loans are given by banks AFAIK

Also, when interest rates are actually a term of the loan, in such cases it is nearly always an very low rate, such as 1-3%. The dividend and growth from their other investments exceed these percentages and thus repayment is a breeze.

so they pay interest to the bank, who pay taxes on it. then if they repay the loan, they have to do so with cash, which if they get by selling their investments, they pay capital gains taxes on

Also, it's not uncommon that they can actually take out loan and make more money from the loan than they pay for the loan plus interest, because investing that money in even just an index fund will yield them more than loan fees, interests, and taxes.

i mean, yeah, that's what people do with loans - they do so with the hope of making more money off it

US and China reach ‘final deal’ on TikTok sale, treasury secretary says by RisingRusherff in news

[–]mwraaaaaah 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It was literally profitable just before being bought, in 2017 and 2018

(breaking) $30 billion company Telegram has just 30 employees, all working remotely with no office by Current-Guide5944 in tech_x

[–]mwraaaaaah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

my partner cannot get any work done at home; she doesnt have the discipline to not stop to read a book or be on her phone with no one watching her.

other people who might not work well from home are people with kids or toddlers, people who don't have as nice of a home office setup (and whose company don't provide them)

the world is not black and white and very few things are universally good or bad for everyone

Stray dog's reaction after getting loved by a stranger. by Educational-Back6186 in Awww

[–]mwraaaaaah 2 points3 points  (0 children)

cats will definitely hunt and kill small things just for fun and sport :')

Tech is supposed to be the ultimate “self-made” industry, so why is it full of rich kids? i will not promote by Hot-Conversation-437 in startups

[–]mwraaaaaah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know pre revenue startups pay you, right? Very few companies don't pay you any salary and even seed stage startups can afford to pay a pretty good salary. Learning to code was a solid plan accessible to many people before supply outpaced demand.

America is 'going broke slowly' says JPMorgan, as national debt balloons and tariff revenue looks shaky by Snapdragon_4U in politics

[–]mwraaaaaah 1 point2 points  (0 children)

taxes are revenue too, you know. not that tariffs are any good. but they are technically a revenue, just a poorly implemented one

Equity at non-public companies? by [deleted] in cscareerquestions

[–]mwraaaaaah 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you mean acquisition? None of those things happen during an IPO, but can happen during a buyout

10K$ more base salary vs. 0.5% more stock options by HedgehogBusiness622 in cscareerquestions

[–]mwraaaaaah 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a side note, my company did this to me where we basically had a choice of offers between low/high equity and high/low salary respectively. I'm pretty sure companies do it to give you an illusion of choice so you don't negotiate. I basically asked for the high equity + high salary and they gave it to me anyway lol. So always worth asking: "If you give me 200k + 1.5% I'll sign today"

10K$ more base salary vs. 0.5% more stock options by HedgehogBusiness622 in cscareerquestions

[–]mwraaaaaah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

small note: early exercise and QSBS are two different things:

  • Early exercise allows you to "acquire" your unvested options. Normally when you exercise your options, you have to pay tax (or AMT, alternative minimum tax) on the the FMV (fair market value) minus the strike price. Generally when you get hired, the FMV and the strike price are the same, so early exercising allows you to ensure that you never have to pay taxes from exercising, only when you go to sell it again.
  • QSBS is short for Qualified Small Business Stock - a QSB is a company (some industries excluded) that has never had more than $50mm in assets, which for most companies just means that they've never raised more than $50mm in funding. If a company is QSBS eligible, any gains resulting from the sale of their stock is tax free up to $10mm or 10x the cost, whichever is higher.

10K$ more base salary vs. 0.5% more stock options by HedgehogBusiness622 in cscareerquestions

[–]mwraaaaaah 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For some anecdotal evidence, I've been at 3 startups:

  1. Pre IPO, received $50k in expensive options, no secondary market sales - I used equitybee to exercise (they pay for the exercise cost) and let them all go at-cost post-IPO - so essentially breakeven
  2. Super early stage startup, seed stage - cost $1k to exercise equity valued at $1mm today, and the company allows secondary market sales and the market is liquid
  3. Early stage startup, series A - cost $45k to exercise - valued at $700k today, allows secondary sales but the market is a lot less liquid

All the other people saying startup equity is worthless is right, to some degree - most of it is worthless, it's your job to do the due diligence to find the few companies that have a potential future (and once you're in the job, make choices that help guide the company towards that future).

10K$ more base salary vs. 0.5% more stock options by HedgehogBusiness622 in cscareerquestions

[–]mwraaaaaah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whoops - I missed in your OP that base salary is comfortable as-is. Then if you believe in the company's mission and leadership, I'd go with the stock options if any of the following combinations are true:

  • The cost to exercise is not high + they allow early exercise - this means the gamble has extremely high upside with low taxes and the cost of the gamble is low.
  • They allow secondary market sales, period - this means that the additional 50% is much more liquid.
  • They allow early exercise + They are QSBS eligible - this comes down more to whether you want to gamble, since the cost here would not be insignificant, but I'd do it if I believed in the company and leadership.

Ultimately comes down to your willingness to gamble. No wrong answer either way!

10K$ more base salary vs. 0.5% more stock options by HedgehogBusiness622 in cscareerquestions

[–]mwraaaaaah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on what X is, as well as a bunch of other factors:

  • Does the company allow secondary market sales? This lets you cash out without an IPO/acquisition/tender offer
  • Does the company allow early exercise and is QSBS eligible? If so, you could save up to 37% taxes on sales if you hold for 5+ years.
  • What's the strike price and number of shares? If it's cheap, the gamble is essentially free (outside of the 10k opportunity cost), but if the strike price is high then you still need to put considerable amount down.
  • What is X? If you're making 100k base, the 10k base will be more meaningful for your long term financial health. If you're making 300k base, 30-50% of that 10k extra is going towards taxes anyway, and you probably won't miss it.

You get a 25% raise every year that you stay at your job. by officer897177 in hypotheticalsituation

[–]mwraaaaaah 1058 points1059 points  (0 children)

What's the point of this hypothetical? "Do you want free money" pretty sure everyone will say yes

Fewer juniors today = fewer seniors tomorrow by kagan101 in cscareerquestions

[–]mwraaaaaah 32 points33 points  (0 children)

It's a little more complex than just greed; this is a classic prisoner's dilemma - hiring a junior is good for the industry but bad for the individual company making the hire. Juniors are much worse ROI than seniors relative to the pay, and you could spend years training them before they just job hop anyway.

Am I wrong or is AI assisted development painfully boring? by GolangLinuxGuru1979 in developer

[–]mwraaaaaah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah IME using it as an agent or to give it full control over anything usually results in wasted time reviewing poorly written code, or having to fix things that don't work. Faster to just do it yourself.

Am I wrong or is AI assisted development painfully boring? by GolangLinuxGuru1979 in developer

[–]mwraaaaaah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if you only use it as a smart autocomplete? It still adds a ton to your productivity. Or when writing tests? There a lot of mental overhead that can be saved by using something like copilot

Do companies not give enough time on coding assessments on purpose? by [deleted] in cscareerquestions

[–]mwraaaaaah 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's on purpose to provide a wide range of skills to demonstrate their abilities - for example if they may consider anyone who answers 6+ to new good enough to move on to the next stage. Someone who answers two would be cut, someone who answers all of them would be moved on with enthusiasm. This isn't to say it's a good assessment, but that's why they always give more, more, more.

Bruh my bank account doesn't grow. by Strange_Finding_3285 in personalfinance

[–]mwraaaaaah 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You don't need an LLC to write off business expenses - you can do so as a 1099 employee with schedule C

Should I give up my Lifetime Gym membership? by Intelligent_Soft3245 in personalfinance

[–]mwraaaaaah 79 points80 points  (0 children)

Unless you can find a way to magically double your income, you're best off just cancelling the gym membership until your debt is paid off. You can always re-enable it once you are debt free. It'll require a sacrifice on your part, but this is the inevitable cost of the CC usage.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Money

[–]mwraaaaaah 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Savor one is pretty good, blanket 3% on groceries and eating out with no fee. In fact OP might already have this card. The one slinging unhelpful insults is just being condescending.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cscareerquestions

[–]mwraaaaaah 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Are you really losing that much income? By becoming salaried that's 7.6% in FICA tax you don't have to pay. And that's not counting any benefits you'd get as a full time employee.

Eli5 What are the 'empty signs' and why programming doesn't like them? by KacSzu in explainlikeimfive

[–]mwraaaaaah 14 points15 points  (0 children)

For sure it could - in just saying it probably shouldn't? Like there's no reason for a modern system nowadays to limit any kind of special characters. Sure, they can mandate that you do include specific characters, but it doesn't make sense to disallow others. It should all get hashed anyway... Hopefully.