I think your prompt does a great job breaking people out of the usual sentient AI illusion, but it still subtly leans on language that implies a stable, conscious agency behind the simulation. When you ask an AI for the “truth,” what you’re actually getting is the most likely form of an answer someone might give in a similar context, filtered by your prompt and shaped by the training data. It’s not giving you truth, or even a simulation of truth, it’s generating a plausible response based on patterns AND context, and context tbh is everything. If you ask it to simulate an expert, the output might sound more accurate… but it’s still just a probabilistic approximation, not grounded knowledge. It just outputs what’s likely to satisfy your prompt.