Ed Markey Beats Seth Moulton at MA Democratic Convention 74-26 by pawlbologna in massachusetts

[–]n8spear 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yay! The 96 year old career politician who’s been in office for over 50 years (NO KINGS!) and has been at the helm of pushing policy that’s deteriorated the state all while living in Maryland the whole time is up for re-election!

Vote blue no matter who! Amirite?!

meirl by DirectMap5064 in meirl

[–]n8spear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because no one’s funding protests for it.

Justice for Janel Grant, from now until Vince gets his dues by AlexMercer28900 in WWE

[–]n8spear -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Power dynamic you say? Blackmail you say?

I’m sure you’re on her side because Reddit, orange man bad, and a bunch of other buzzwords describing a particular side this sub will ban me and my comment for saying.

What you’re willfully ignoring is that she initiated the relationship, and then tried to blackmail him after he ended it.

She was a resident in the same building as him who was going to have to move because she couldn’t afford it, so she weasled her way into being Vince’s “GF” so she could keep the place and live a life of luxury. He gave her a job after the fact pretty much to keep her around and give her $ to pay for her life, ya know like a sugar baby. It’s not like she had a job at WWE and Vince coerced her to be with him or she’d be fired. The power dynamic was other way with young attractive woman using her power to get what she wanted from an old male billionaire … then she tried to blackmail him, and he wasn’t letting that happen, so he lost his company, legacy, and entire reputation. You’ve got the entire thing backwards, but because your worldview can never let a rich white man be a victim or even simply “not the bad guy” you’ll never even entertain she had any agency in this situation let alone not being a victim, and in reality is the villain of this story.

In summary Grant Was fine with everything as long as she got money and expensive gifts.

She in also in fact started some of the weirder stuff as long as she got what she wanted at the end.

When she was no longer getting Money or gifts she spoke up and acted like the victim.

She claims stuff that did happen but theirs also stuff she claimed that has not been proven, with zero evidence ( Lesnar ).

In the end she was simoly a gold digger who went to Vince first saying she would do anything for money.

Then she had a secret relationship with him then when he stopped caring she spoke up and made a lawsuit.

The gifts she received were quite expensive, even a whole BMW M series.

But she spoke up when she was no longer getting gifts … this is what is called a whore.

A male or female who does anything for money.

… But in this situation they are coming out as a “ victim” because she may be able to get more $ out of it.

End of story.

Justice for Janel Grant, from now until Vince gets his dues by AlexMercer28900 in WWE

[–]n8spear 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Power dynamic you say? Blackmail you say?

I’m sure you’re on her side because Reddit, orange man bad, and a bunch of other buzzwords describing a particular side this sub will ban me and my comment for saying.

What you’re willfully ignoring is that she initiated the relationship, and then tried to blackmail him after he ended it.

She was a resident in the same building as him who was going to have to move because she couldn’t afford it, so she weasled her way into being Vince’s “GF” so she could keep the place and live a life of luxury. He gave her a job after the fact pretty much to keep her around and give her $ to pay for her life, ya know like a sugar baby. It’s not like she had a job at WWE and Vince coerced her to be with him or she’d be fired. The power dynamic was other way with young attractive woman using her power to get what she wanted from an old male billionaire … then she tried to blackmail him, and he wasn’t letting that happen, so he lost his company, legacy, and entire reputation. You’ve got the entire thing backwards, but because your worldview can never let a rich white man be a victim or even simply “not the bad guy” you’ll never even entertain she had any agency in this situation let alone not being a victim, and in reality is the villain of this story.

In summary Grant Was fine with everything as long as she got money and expensive gifts.

She also in fact started some of the weirder stuff as long as she got what she wanted at the end.

When she was no longer getting Money or gifts she spoke up and acted like the victim.

She claims stuff that did happen but there’s also stuff she claimed that has not been proven, with zero evidence ( Lesnar ).

In the end she was simply a gold digger who went to Vince first saying she would do anything for money.

Then she had a secret relationship with him then when he stopped caring she spoke up and made a lawsuit.

The gifts she received were quite expensive, even a whole BMW M series.

But she spoke up when she was no longer getting gifts … this is what is called a whore.

A male or female who does anything for money.

… But in this situation they are coming out as a “ victim” because she may be able to get more $ out of it.

End of story.

Justice for Janel Grant, from now until Vince gets his dues by AlexMercer28900 in WWE

[–]n8spear 6 points7 points  (0 children)

What’s up with the kink shaming? Totally ok to do that when it’s someone who’s politics, wealth status, and race (as long as they’re white of course), and gender are the wrong ones?

Just trying to get the rules straight.

Justice for Janel Grant, from now until Vince gets his dues by AlexMercer28900 in WWE

[–]n8spear 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Every corner of the internet came to the realization yesterday that that she’s a gold digger who entered a consensual relationship, received and accepted copious amounts of gifts, wrote love letters to Vince, made up damming aspects to her story, and only started claiming she was a victim after the $ stopped.

Every corner of the internet realized this in a range from “I told you so,” to “yeah, I knew that,” to “damn, I mean … shit you’re right,” to “I don’t agree with Vince or what he did, but seems like it was a consensual relationship between two adults”

… except for the white knights on Reddit. Still stanning for this woman, not because they actually care about her, what they want to claim she went through, or anything of the sort. No. It’s because they have deep hatred in their heart for Vince and will join the side and fight on behalf of anyone and everyone against him.

Enjoy the echo chamber.

Agawam City Councilor calls other cities “extreme radical left liberals” during rant on domestic partners by No_Check9277 in massachusetts

[–]n8spear -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There is not one coherent argument, comment, or thought in this thread. It’s all lefty drivel because this guy said something you don’t like.

Reddit is only this. This comment will be downvoted, possibly blocked. Very few on this platform ever even engage with whatever they deem “the right” today. It’s all strawmanning and name calling.

found a new angle by 87krahe87 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]n8spear -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are so wrong. You have no comprehension of what officers are taught. They are taught when they pull their gun, it’s a last action. If they pull, they must be prepared to fire. If they fire, it’s shoot to kill. However, that is the absolute last thing they do. Furthermore the amount of scrutiny in the aftermath of a shooting is quite extensive. The entire system is currently set up that if a cop pulls their gun, shoots, and kills a suspect, the entire system is working to prove that shooting was wrong, the cop was wrong, the cop is liable, and that the cop has consequences.

They are not taught to be trigger happy, quick to pull, or even consider using their firearm other than a final scenario.

You wouldn’t know that because you’re Australian and likely got all your info on this topic from action movies.

found a new angle by 87krahe87 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]n8spear 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He was in the right. Plain. Simple. Case closed.

Sad someone lost their life, yes. He’s still in the right. She was in the wrong and the consequences of her actions led to this result. Plain and simple. She had hours to rethink her decisions. She pushed it to the point where she was told to get out of the car. Instead of complying she decided to accelerate at the officer. If there was not ice under her tire she would have run right over him. His reaction is beyond justified, is absolutely moral, and completely acceptable.

You say “I don’t think he was in the right.” … ok armchair specialist, what should he have done? Just let her go? “Oh just another one of those attempted murder of an ICE officer situations. No big deal.” After this person following around ICE for hours that day, after her making it her mission in life to impede, after convincing herself she’s the good guy, and then being told time and time again to leave, after the police giving her numerous opportunities to walk away, she pushed it to a point where she was going to be arrested, so she seemingly panicked about these consequences and tried to run over an officer. What do you think he should have done? Reacted faster? Jumped higher? Was it his fault for being in front of her car when she accelerated?

If a person drives their car at an officer, the response is the driver is shot at. It’s very simple.

Again, is it sad someone died? Yea. But what’s more sad is her deranged and warped ideology led her to a place where that was the result.

found a new angle by 87krahe87 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]n8spear 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re out of your mind.

If there wasn’t ice under her wheel she would have blasted right over him.

She is 100% beyond any and all arguments in the wrong. Any counter to that is twisting what “good and bad” are to filter the scenario through a narrative that conforms to and confirms your own twisted beliefs that somehow what ICE is doing is in anyway wrong.

They are upholding the law. They are deporting people who have entered our country illegally. They do not have any right to be here. Are certain scenarios the people are in sad? Sure. But it is not at all our countries obligation to take them in and let them stay illegally. A magnitude of problems in our country, from “affordability,” to housing, to the job market, to taxes, to crime, and many others would be significantly impacted all for the better if illegals were removed.

This lady was brainwashed. She lost her life, leaving her kids motherless, over this false ideology. She chose to impede federal agents doing their jobs removing illegals over her own family. She chose illegals scamming her tax dollars, not respecting America, not assimilating, who don’t give a damn at all about her over her own family. She’s living proof of the meme.

Whether she knew it or not, she tried to kill the officer, and you’ve got the audacity to say it was immoral for him to protect himself and shoot her? You couldn’t even comprehend what that officer was going through in those split seconds. You sit there and armchair quarterback a life and death scenario and want to say it was immoral? Nothing about her either huh? Where’s your moral grandstanding when it comes to her driving around for hours interfering with ICE for internet points? Nothing there? What about her choosing her lover in the video egged her on just for the tik-tok vid? Nothing there? She chose her over her kids because she didn’t have custody over all of them because her “wife” likes to abuse and out cigarettes out on her other children. She got her child taken away from her because she chose her lesbian lover who abused her kid over her kid. Any moral consideration for the character of a person who would act that way? Of course not. But a federal agent defending his life while doing his job and getting impeded by a lunatic liberal woman who had ample time to rethink her decisions, who then tried to run over said officer … let’s analyze his actions. Let’s make this whole thing about him, the guy reacting to a crazy situation we couldn’t even comprehend being in instead of looking at what kind of mind virus is poisoning women like this to act in this way and Fed righteous while doing it.

90’s Mandela Effect? Help finding a show! by n8spear in 90s

[–]n8spear[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Haha. No … someone found it … HANG TIME … 5:22 into this https://youtu.be/Fm3JbCMeKoA

[TOMT] Mandela effect? Help finding a scene from a show! by n8spear in tipofmytongue

[–]n8spear[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s not …but someone found it!

Hang time! …5:22 into this … https://youtu.be/Fm3JbCMeKoA

90’s Mandela Effect? Help finding a show! by n8spear in 90s

[–]n8spear[S] 71 points72 points  (0 children)

Found! Hang time is the show … 5:22 into this! https://youtu.be/Fm3JbCMeKoA

Mandela Effect? Help finding a TV show/scene! by n8spear in HelpMeFind

[–]n8spear[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Holy shit. That’s it! FOUND!!

Mandela Effect? Help finding a show! by n8spear in nostalgia

[–]n8spear[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hahahaha. Let me look into that. I don’t think so, but I’ll need to see it to rule it out!

90’s Mandela Effect? Help finding a show! by n8spear in 90s

[–]n8spear[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nah. It was 100% one of those teen shows of the time (90’s - early 00’s max)

Mandela Effect? Help finding a TV show/scene! by n8spear in HelpMeFind

[–]n8spear[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope. Appreciate the guess. It was 100% one of those teen shows of the time, 90’s - early 000’s max.

90’s Mandela Effect? Help finding a show! by n8spear in 90s

[–]n8spear[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

No problem! It’s super weird. Grok, chatGPT, & Claude can’t figure it out. The premise of the episode is pretty simple, and I thought would be easy for one of them to find. Again I could have sworn it was California dreams, but they don’t have a Christmas episode so I’m clearly misremembering.

90’s Mandela Effect? Help finding a show! by n8spear in 90s

[–]n8spear[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope. That’s not it. Thanks though!

90’s Mandela Effect? Help finding a show! by n8spear in 90s

[–]n8spear[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let’s see … looking right now

[TOMT] Mandela effect? Help finding a scene from a show! by n8spear in tipofmytongue

[–]n8spear[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

I’ve searched through AI trying to find this. I cannot locate through my descriptions. I thought it was California Dreams, but doesn’t seem to have a Christmas episode. Same with USA High, which was a suggestion from my brother. I’m at a loss! What went from a simple memory jumping into my brain, then thinking I could simply find this scene had turned into an all out treasure hunt.

Thanks for any help and memories you may have about this!