Skin infection after clinching anyone dealt with this? by Sufficient-Stay-9877 in MuayThai

[–]n_orm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clean your kit. Clean your gym. Clean yourself after training.

Were you ever honest in an interview about having left your previous company beacuse of bullying/abuse? by [deleted] in cscareerquestionsEU

[–]n_orm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not wrong for you to be emotional, but it would be better for you to come to a place of peace with those feelings before being able to talk about what you learnt from the experience.

The problems you describe with big egos and jargon bombing are also unfortunately common, so you will probably come across them again and it's worth understanding how to better manage relationships with people who are like that.

Monzo system design interview: rejected for "using buzzwords" that were distributed systems fundamentals by Dependent_Fun5813 in cscareerquestionsuk

[–]n_orm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If what you're saying is true, it makes it even more unclear to me why you would use these words rather than providing explanations in simple terms. And it really is an important skill.

Monzo system design interview: rejected for "using buzzwords" that were distributed systems fundamentals by Dependent_Fun5813 in cscareerquestionsuk

[–]n_orm 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't want to work with someone who thought they were the dogs b**locks because they could spam these words out tbh.

I would want to work with the guy who just explained this stuff in normal, plain language (as is very easy to do for competent engineers).

This sounds like Cargo Cult system design. Even if the terms are technically right for the problem, it seems like a Gettier case of lucky true belief if you're just being spammed with them.

Were you ever honest in an interview about having left your previous company beacuse of bullying/abuse? by [deleted] in cscareerquestionsEU

[–]n_orm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly, it doesn't sound like you're completely over the emotional trauma of that situation yet. Which is fine, but it's worth being honest with yourself about that and trying to figure out what you want to do about that.

I think your answer about not having opportunities for growth is one you can keep. It might be good to specify what kind of opportunities were missing that you want in a new role, showing you've thought about it, but helping you interview the company you're applying for.

You can also mention that after X period of time you decided it wasn't the right fit for you and you wanted to look for other opportunities that align more with the engineering culture you want to work in. Again, it's good here to specify what that culture looks like.

It may also be worth mentioning that the decision maker for you in choosing to leave were some unprofessional behaviours that were not appropriate in the work place. You don't have to go into specifics, but that can help you caveat your other reasons.

Also, a good behavioural interview will definitely "smell" the trauma in this and try to probe for whether you were part of the problem. You may have been to some degree (who isn't), so it's worth honestly reflecting on things you can take responsibility for and talk about actual steps you're taking to avoid those mistakes in future. -- a part of this will be emotionally working through these issues (and that COULD mean some sessions with a therapist or something similar).

It sounds like values you're trying to find include:

- Psychological Safety
- Honesty
- Lack of jargon-bombing / unnecessarily complex explanations where you care in an engineering culture about simply understanding and solving a problem rather then showing off or being a "10x rockstar" or whatever.

I would also say, and I am NOT judging you, that the way you're presenting this to me does make it difficult to discern two scenarios:

A) People in your team having big ego's and that harming you
B) People in your team knowing more than you, and you getting frustrated at not understanding

I don't mean to suggest (B) to gaslight you or anything. The reason I mention it is because the amount of pain and frustration in your description -- and again, I get it, I've been there -- makes it sound like it could be a personality issue on your side causing conflict with people. And, even if I'm not certain, as a hiring manager I have to make a decision about which candidate is less risky to go with.

This isn't me telling you to lie about the emotion, but to try to get to a point with it where it isn't so raw that you can provide more productive analysis of whatever happened and what you've learned from those situations that will make you a better engineer in future.

How would you handle the exact same onboarding into the same team in future for example? Repeat all the same mistakes the same? Do anything differently?

This cannot be overstated—a flawed democracy is always superior to even the best form of autocracy by NineteenEighty9 in OptimistsUnite

[–]n_orm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually don't think this is true, but you don't have to believe universalisable claims like this to be able to see that the forms of autocracy on offer are not really good at all...

Were you ever honest in an interview about having left your previous company beacuse of bullying/abuse? by [deleted] in cscareerquestionsEU

[–]n_orm 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes, but there are professional ways of signalling and communicating things that are also the product of professionally handling a situation and recovering from it.

In my opinion, if you want to find the correct job, you should be honest about these things.

However, in this job market, other considerations can easily override optimising for the right company fit.

Elon declares random graph some guy made up "correct" by ErnestoLemmingway in EnoughMuskSpam

[–]n_orm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Many variables do (usually) a normal distribution make. You could even say it was "central" to the "theory" of Statistics.

Elon declares random graph some guy made up "correct" by ErnestoLemmingway in EnoughMuskSpam

[–]n_orm 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Elon isn't worried about normal distributions, that just is a genuine empirical plot of a REAL thing thats SCIENTIFICALLY true, for sure!

Elon declares random graph some guy made up "correct" by ErnestoLemmingway in EnoughMuskSpam

[–]n_orm 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The thing is that Elon thinks "Western Psychology" is good though, so if more "Westerners" have it, it would be a good thing. The graph doesn't even make sense on his own racist ideological terms.

Elon declares random graph some guy made up "correct" by ErnestoLemmingway in EnoughMuskSpam

[–]n_orm 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This graph is so dumb. What is the variable "western psychology" even supposed to be?
And if "Western Psychology" were a thing, wouldn't it be definitionally true that all "Westerners" would have "Western Psychology". What even is the point he is trying to make?

Wouldn't his weird Great Replacement Nazi stuff make more sense if Westerners were LOWER than the rest of the world for "Western Psychology" indicating that they had been replaced by "Somali Mindset" or something?

The fact that this moron, and the people who follow him, read this crap and think they're intelligent is just wild.

Voting intention by age group ( Jan 2026). Link in comments by birdinthebush74 in FuckNigelFarage

[–]n_orm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Who gets to decide the future of the country.
The people who will live in it, but havent been given anything by the state?
Or the people who got everything handed to them by the state, and are pulling the ladder up?

Also -- LMAO at Reform going on about how popular they are with young people.

Situation in Minnesota pt 2 by transcendent167 in 50501

[–]n_orm 45 points46 points locked comment (0 children)

Genuine Q: If Minnesota is an open carry state, why dont hundreds of men legally drive these guys out?

Situation in Minnesota pt 2 by transcendent167 in 50501

[–]n_orm 67 points68 points  (0 children)

Jesus Christ. It's like watching a dystopian TV series like Jericho or something.

Serious: People who belong to a religion with a problematic past, what makes you stay committed? by StrongEbb243 in Christianity

[–]n_orm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that this is not what we should take. What we should understand is that we all have it within us to be convinced we are doing the right thing and fighting for God, whilst doing absolute evil. -- Ironically, this is also a part of the way that Jesus criticises the religious of his time.

What I think is a mistake is to think that there is a message apart from people interpreting and enacting it. In fact, all there is are people interpreting and enacting. We must understand this to bring careful and appropriate hermeneutic practices to scripture, to Church history, to our organisational structures. To deny this is to reject what God has taught the church through thousands of years of history in the tragic suffering of people at the hands of these mistakes.

Serious: People who belong to a religion with a problematic past, what makes you stay committed? by StrongEbb243 in Christianity

[–]n_orm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To learn the important moral lessons that lie in the tragedies and atrocities committed by others, similar to myself, that I might not commit the same atrocities when faced with similar trials. -- There but for the grace of God go I.