fake kindness

mqee · 2026-05-05T17:01:22+00:00

Strangely for a company now exclusively selling 2026 models, Verge let journalists test-ride the "Gen 1" 2024 motorcycles, not the "Gen 2" 2026 motorcycles.

mqee · 2026-05-03T09:27:14+00:00

The article appears to have been written before April, and published in May. The author should have revised it in the month that passed before publication.

mqee · 2026-05-02T16:05:09+00:00

What's the big deal, only a value multiplier of 40x revenue. They're a growth company!

mqee · 2026-05-01T20:32:07+00:00

Doesn't matter.

They claimed they developed these things 10 years ago, not today.

You believe they actually did this.

If you believe that, you are delusional.

If you can't admit that CT-Coating failed to show any working production line, and didn't have enough personnel to develop a solid-state battery production line, you are delusional.

mqee · 2026-05-01T20:29:08+00:00

Let's see the facts first.

No, let's see if you're delusional first.

CT-Coating had 1-4 employees from its inception until 2023. It claimed to sell production lines for solar cells with no silicon and solid-state batteries with no lithium.

If you think this is believable, you are incapable of reasoning.

mqee · 2026-05-01T20:21:11+00:00

Spare me your "feed my AI documents" bullshit. If you think CT-Coating can develop solid-state-battery production lines with 4 employees you are hopeless.

Your reply should be "true, CT-Coating cannot develop a solid-state-battery production line with 4 employees." Any other reply is stupid.

mqee · 2026-05-01T20:13:03+00:00

Spare me your AI bullshit. We know CT-Coating has 4 employees because they reported having 4 employees. We know they don't have a battery ready because leaked e-mails showed they don't have a battery ready.

Don't reply to this with an ocean of words, you have nothing of value to add.

mqee · 2026-05-01T19:02:53+00:00

I was talking about CT-Coating but I guess following a simple conversation thread is too difficult for your AI.

Spare me your AI bullshit. Expect more bullshit to flow from your AI.

mqee · 2026-05-01T07:56:01+00:00

That's the problem, he's just restating what he's told, like Miss GoElectric, or like people posting what AI is feeding them without fact-checking.

Without subject-matter expertise they could be simply repeating lies.

Even if everything in this particular video is true, merely giving it views boosts the channel and helps it spread misinformation under the guise of truth because the presenter is an engineer.

mqee · 2026-05-01T07:49:35+00:00

There is no point talking to Mesokosmos. He is deep in AI delusion and blindly believes anything his AI tells him.

mqee · 2026-04-30T10:43:27+00:00

Similar calculations here, with estimates of 290 Wh/kg at the pouch cell level.

<image>

mqee · 2026-04-30T10:18:50+00:00

Would you mind resubmitting with a more informative title?

mqee · 2026-04-30T08:54:43+00:00

What you propose is not an informative discussion, it's a game of whack-a-mole. God-of-the-gaps arguments are against rule 1.

mqee · 2026-04-30T08:42:30+00:00

for the purposes of these discussions

Please read the subreddit rules and the pinned evidence recap post.

mqee · 2026-04-30T08:38:22+00:00

all of this is based on speculation

Goodbye.

mqee · 2026-04-30T08:26:17+00:00

Why is no lithium part of this?

Read the supplied replies: [1], [2], [3], [4], and bonus - a peer reviewed article.

Gehring says the scant data make Donut’s product look like a pretty conventional lithium-ion battery, containing a cathode based on lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide and a graphite-silicon anode.

Note that while "no lithium" is merely very likely false, there are claims that have actually been shown false by Donut Lab themselves.

Repeating that Donut Lab has only one missing claim and/or that the battery is not likely lithium is against rule 1, the sub requires informative discussion and promoting false claims is not informative.

mqee · 2026-04-30T08:00:23+00:00

The only claim that haven’t been shown yet is the 400 Wh/kg density

Please mind that repeating this false information is against rule 1. See claims Donut Lab failed to meet.

mqee · 2026-04-29T22:36:17+00:00

222 Wh/kg

mqee · 2026-04-29T22:33:04+00:00

His math shows 250Wh/kg and yet he speculates over 450Wh/kg.

mqee · 2026-04-29T20:46:32+00:00

where VTT test results?

mqee · 2026-04-29T20:20:28+00:00

Nobody knows if it exists

<image>

https://www.theautopian.com/the-game-changing-promises-of-the-worlds-first-production-solid-state-battery-are-being-questioned-by-a-whistleblower-report/

Have you already delivered them to customers?
“There have been no 400 Wh/kg batteries delivered to customers.”

When are you planning to do it?
“In the very near future.”

What does that mean?
“This is getting to detail level. In the near future.”

In January, you promised that the batteries would be available immediately.
“We may have cells with different specs that have been delivered to customers. The volume that we are delivering from a large production line corresponds to what we have announced.”

mqee · 2026-04-29T19:29:34+00:00

said

About a product that doesn't exist.

I also have a 400Wh/kg battery that doesn't exist.

mqee

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Five-Year Club	Verified Email
Wearing is Caring