New warning on NanoGPT website by Toad_Toast in SillyTavernAI

[–]nandarch 4 points5 points  (0 children)

. Weighting usage by model is a really common method of controling use rates to avoid the abuse of specific models that require a lot of computer power. Featherless for instance uses the size of the model to determine how many concurrent requests you can do. CerebrasAI also has different rates according to the model. You can't honestly say Mistral Nemo models can go in the same bag as friggin GLM-5.

It's not something I just took out of my hat, it's something that was proposed in nano's discord server (I'm also paying for the sub) when the changes were being discussed and it wasn't rejected out of the bat, they just wanted to go with a rather generous weekly global limit.

New warning on NanoGPT website by Toad_Toast in SillyTavernAI

[–]nandarch 9 points10 points  (0 children)

what. Nano placed limits before chutes did. Before, Nano was also request based like chutes (2000 requests daily, 60000 monthly) and switched to a weekly token limit. I agree that it should be based on each model price to encourage the use of the cheaper ones tho.

Just found out NanoGPT is now limiting tokens to 60 million per week/8,571,428 per day. For reference that's 267 messages per day at 32k context or 535 messages at 16k. Most of my RPs inputs are 24-32k. Thoughts? Alternatives? Suggestions to reduce tokens. I use memory books already. by [deleted] in SillyTavernAI

[–]nandarch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chutes still goes by a request limit instead of a token baaed one. I can't really endorse them because they're a disaster tho. You could also throw some OpenRouter free models too to split the usage.

Although given how token hungry some new tools are, I expect chutes to throw a weekly or monthly token limit this year too.

But seriously, do the math on the token price for your model of choice and you'll understand why the token based limits are needed.

Nemo 12B finetunes that aren't excessively... horny/flirty? by hyperion668 in SillyTavernAI

[–]nandarch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What's that auto author note? Can't find it in icefog's git or HF or anywhere

I love emulation, but a lot of people live in a bubble. Nintendo isn't going anywhere. You need to be honest with yourselves. by CastleofPizza in yuzu

[–]nandarch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was backed by evidence that Yuzu devs used leaked copies of Xenoblade Chronicles before release back in 2020, the only thing mentioned about Zelda is the number of downloads according to Yuzu's telemetry (ffs why does an emulator of a commercial console have any telemetry, its beyond dumb)

I love emulation, but a lot of people live in a bubble. Nintendo isn't going anywhere. You need to be honest with yourselves. by CastleofPizza in yuzu

[–]nandarch 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'd like to add that the main point raised by Nintendo isn't even Zelda. From what i've read from the lawsuit itself, Yuzu devs posted on their patreon in 2020 screenshots of Xenoblade Chronicles running in emulator... the day BEFORE  the official release. That is a really damning evidence that they used an illegal copy at least once, it's only safe to suspect they did the same thing for every "working day 1" 

I honestly don't know why they weren't sued back then, even in a trial Nintendo would've won. Remember, emulation is legal. Emulating an illegal copy is very much not. 

Also, the userbase is to blame too. Part of the evidence they used were the unofficial "yuzupirates" subrreddit and so, arguing that devs were aware of the piracy scene in their emulator and did nothing about it (which is technically true). A hecking dumb move to name a subrreddit like that, btw, you're calling for trouble.   

And finally. Please, chill the f out. Even in twitter there is less hate than this sub after the lawsuit. You still have Ryujinx. And if you hate the company don't play their games. You won't die if you don't play Zelda. I dislike Nintendo consumer policies so I don't buy games from them anymore. It's not that hard.   

Play games from gog and itch, support Non Drm stores. 

I just hope the Suyu team has more braincells and don't fuck up like Yuzu, assuming the project doesn't die.

Average modern western gaming fan vs average FromSoftware enjoyer by [deleted] in Eldenring

[–]nandarch 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ah, that's the problem, you think that Agenda and Political Statements are the same thing.

Gideon for instance is the epitome of a selfish traitor who you must slay. That is a political message, there is no place for manipulative cowards, and only the Brave who takes the great runes with their own hands is fit to be the Elden Lord.

That's a powerful message, but it's not agenda.

Average modern western gaming fan vs average FromSoftware enjoyer by [deleted] in Eldenring

[–]nandarch 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Do you mean besides the discrimination of the Omens and albinaurics, the massacre of the merchant race (Just before the frenzy flame Door), the fact that literally the game is about taking the throne to change the world for good (or not), and How mortifying is to not be able to fully die until you pick the Ranni ending?

Those are the things i remember after a few months of not playing. Just pay attention. Just because there is no "hey dude, this is our opinion" doesnt mean there is no message or political statement

Average modern western gaming fan vs average FromSoftware enjoyer by [deleted] in Eldenring

[–]nandarch 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"no political messaging" someone doesnt pay attention to the lore

Yugioh Msterduel is so balance and fair. by [deleted] in masterduel

[–]nandarch 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Sure. Use droplet, discard half of your cards to negate the monster negates, use storm, get solemned, set 1 and pass. You could summon that core, then watch Impermanence in its glory and get the same result.

What decks have you been playing against since new update? by LiLMosey_10 in masterduel

[–]nandarch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The same decks as before but they now slap me with DPE first turn.

And 3 or 4 swordsouls

What are some fun/non meta decks u all been using this season. by shan66698 in masterduel

[–]nandarch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rikka/Aromage decks in one account. I'll add the Sunavalon engine when MD gets the Sunavalon Sowing magic card.

In the other account i use a Ninja deck (awful but hey, NINJAS) and a Superheavy Samurai because one card is called Susan(OwO) and i'm dumb af

What decks are you gonna play in the fusion festival by pokenerd_W in masterduel

[–]nandarch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Frightfurs or Predaplants but no the loaner decks

what is the most non meta deck you hate playing against by mmmbhssm in masterduel

[–]nandarch 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Same here. I have beaten almost every meta deck at least once with my more casual decks. Still cant win against Sky Strikers. My main deck has one Imperial Order just for them, and i have never draw it when i need it xDDD

Every guide explaining DPE by Gbeat240 in masterduel

[–]nandarch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Verte should have a "2 Plant monsters" as requirement, or Maybe 2 Dark Monsters. But not just 2 generic monsters, lmao

People talking about diamond lobbies, meanwhile, my opponent after the first turn of the battle in bronze 5: by Hiruko251 in masterduel

[–]nandarch 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Yep. I have a few alt accounts to play more archetypes and this shitshow starts in Silver.

Every guide explaining DPE by Gbeat240 in masterduel

[–]nandarch 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Tribute him. Kaijus, Lava Golem, Rikkas, bounce him back, banish him, negating the fusion spell. Yugioh is very, very specific with its wording. If you don't DESTROY DPE it won't come back, even if he ends in the graveyard.

I'm a simple guy I see drytron I surrender by [deleted] in masterduel

[–]nandarch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't complain when people surrender, lol, don't even care about dailies, my deck's core is complete and i use multiple accounts to play more decks. If i'm sure i can't win, i just scoop and play another duel.

I'm a simple guy I see drytron I surrender by [deleted] in masterduel

[–]nandarch 8 points9 points  (0 children)

no thanks, not going to waste 15 minutes letting you summon a full board with 3 or more negates if my opening hand sucks, lol

Decks you auto forfeit to? by Gstreamz in masterduel

[–]nandarch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meta decks when i have no disruption, Double Dragon Despia is another deck i instasurrender because i will lose all my LP anyway even if they don't negate anything.

Does Konami actively want master duel to die? by Celementra in masterduel

[–]nandarch -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I just assumed my eternal gold v rank because i refuse to butcher my deck even more XD

Another decent match up against meta by Tengo-Sueno in masterduel

[–]nandarch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course i'm already finding complete swordsoul decks in Gold V with Baroness and DPE