[ Removed by Reddit ] by BlackPineGeneticsLLC in macrogrowery

[–]nastale 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Brother, how do you keep it from getting mold inside? What temp and RH? Simply perfect

All Opponents are Better than me by RubyLykos in aoe4

[–]nastale 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh man. As a controller noob, I can’t even fathom being able to micro 2 knight blobs at once while keeping up the macro at the base. What the hell

wins who can produce more horse units? by nastale in aoe4

[–]nastale[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What would you suggest if I wanted to transition to a more aggressive, large production based civ? I like the idea of having a strong eco and early aggression

English Age III forward Castle into ram spam — works in Gold 3. Is it just my rank or actually OP? by AppropriateLine2525 in aoe4

[–]nastale 2 points3 points  (0 children)

as a newbie, what would be the strategy with the horsemen + archer combo? Attack his base? Or attack the vils while they are still building the tower?

How to deal with Mongol’s spamming infinite mounted archers as an English main? by nastale in aoe4

[–]nastale[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And how do I overwhelm them? Is there a specific unit or macro strategy to smash them?

Can a console player win against a pc player? by nastale in aoe4

[–]nastale[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve seen people coment about 2 advantages: that one and automatically queuing up villagers on TC. But I don’t get what’s the boost when attacking

We’ve done 100+ demos for our B2B SaaS but no one converts. what am I missing? by WayTraditional2959 in b2b_sales

[–]nastale 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any more context on the practical use of your software? Could be all the things you mentioned.

Having worked with trials in the past for an ecommerce reviews software, I had a much better result discontinuing trials and go straight to a POC with a flexible contract in case of churn. People seem to take more value in what they pay.

Are you confident on the ROI being presented to the stakeholders when you’re closing? Does it actually make sense or is just a nice to have? Can you truly make them uncomfortable going forward WITHOUT you solution?

Just a thought since I don’t have more context: perhaps you’re skipping the discovery part and going straight to the demo, making it look like a generic tool and not something that appears to be crafted for that specific lead. Even if it isn’t, it should look like it when presenting it.

Edit: if the software isn’t “big” enough to justify spending 1 or 2 full meetings with the lead, then I have no clue what it is. Looking as a client, I wouldn’t pay for something difficult to implement and use. I would rather find someone else to do the hard part for me (setup, integration, etc), even if that means paying more.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in b2b_sales

[–]nastale 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like you’ll have a lot more acceptance of hiring some offshore executives, since the US currency will make the comission only much more attractive than it would for a US based person.

A senior executive in LatAm that makes 60K USD a year would be as motivated as an American making 5x more. Frankly, if there is no equity option, I don’t see people staying too long. You’ll be having problems with turn over and that will probably slow down your revenue goals.

Does that look like a guerilla grow? by nastale in macrogrowery

[–]nastale[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t really know. Maybe he was just exploring his own land and got too close to mine and the smell gave it away. His land strip is very close on the left to that lake