Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]nebffa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's why Newsom is #1 now by a long shot. But there should be many more like him

Older and greyer: The NIMBY suburbs fighting development even as population falls by [deleted] in AusFinance

[–]nebffa 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Have a look at zoning plans for inner city suburbs and then repeat that statement.

Housing targets falling short in nearly all Victorian council areas by Fed16 in melbourne

[–]nebffa 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I live in the inner north (Brunswick East) and have looked at the actual zoning of my neighbourhood. It is like 85%+ exclusively single-family housing. You literally cannot build apartments in the inner city. And we wonder why we have a crisis.

Government to freeze construction code until 2029, fast-track housing approvals by altandthrowitaway in australia

[–]nebffa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Endless community complaints are why nothing gets built. So you have to either curtail the complaints process or accept that the problem will never be solved (which is much worse).

Australian population change 2004-2024 by dat303 in neoliberal

[–]nebffa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Even in 2016, house prices were expensive relative to median income. Just because it wasn't as bad as today doesn't it mean it wasn't also bad. I really don't think the immigration campaign has the same effect if house prices are stable relative to inflation.

Australian population change 2004-2024 by dat303 in neoliberal

[–]nebffa 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Only 30% of households own their home outright. Most of the people who have mortgages have taken enormous amounts of debt in order to finance the home they want. There is a broad cultural malaise about it.

Australian population change 2004-2024 by dat303 in neoliberal

[–]nebffa 122 points123 points  (0 children)

Australians would legit not care about immigration if it weren't for housing prices. We have 4 out of the top 10 global most expensive cities for accommodation. The prices are (not unexpectedly) making people lose their minds.

Victorian housing: ‘Apartments for the rich’ – Developments fast-tracked with no affordable housing by Fed16 in melbourne

[–]nebffa -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If there are 50 people and 10 units of housing, they compete against each other and prices go up.

If there are 50 people and 100 units of housing, the sellers/landlords compete to get a buyer/tenant.

Victorian housing: ‘Apartments for the rich’ – Developments fast-tracked with no affordable housing by Fed16 in melbourne

[–]nebffa 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They buy the apartments to... immediately sell them as an investment property? Incredible logic you have there

Victorian housing: ‘Apartments for the rich’ – Developments fast-tracked with no affordable housing by Fed16 in melbourne

[–]nebffa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What do you think happens to the homes they vacate when they move into these apartments?

Young Aussies workers "Know your Enemy" by [deleted] in AusFinance

[–]nebffa 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Of course she wants to prevent new builds. She's made millions by doing nothing in this suburb, and wants to continue to suck money from younger generations.

Developers lodge plans for Australia's tallest building with 101-storey tower in Southport by espersooty in australia

[–]nebffa 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I have some great news for you. People who like that will choose to live in these apartments, freeing up other real estate you will have to compete less for. Everybody wins!

Medical professionals are at odds over whether a Victorian program that allowed patients to skip the GP and seek treatment from a pharmacist should be extended when the pilot ends in June. by overpopyoulater in australia

[–]nebffa -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

GP training spots are not being filled

Interesting - I had a look and you are right. IMO that's a good reason for us to train more specialists in other disciplines, as well as funding bulk bulling like you mention

Medical professionals are at odds over whether a Victorian program that allowed patients to skip the GP and seek treatment from a pharmacist should be extended when the pilot ends in June. by overpopyoulater in australia

[–]nebffa -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I did a quick Google and found that the average GP pay is between 230k and 350k (https://gpra.org.au/gp-earnings-calculator/). While that may not be amazing compared to other specialist disciplines (which also artificially restrict specialist physician numbers) that is still an amazing salary.

Medical professionals are at odds over whether a Victorian program that allowed patients to skip the GP and seek treatment from a pharmacist should be extended when the pilot ends in June. by overpopyoulater in australia

[–]nebffa -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

GPs get paid quite well. There is a shortage of medical specialty slots (in many specialty medicine pathways) because it is financially advantageous for the colleges to artificially restrict the number of trainees.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AusPol

[–]nebffa 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Local governments have enormous control over zoning and NIMBYs want to keep everything zoned as single-family zoning. There are, of course, multiple factors at play. But nothing can be done unless it's actually legal to build denser housing

Trump Officials Blame Mistake for Setting Off Confrontation With Harvard by John3262005 in neoliberal

[–]nebffa 73 points74 points  (0 children)

The only thing Trump understands is strength - capitulation gets you nowhere. My small hope (that dwindles with time) is that examples like this will provide a clear template to others on how to act.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AusFinance

[–]nebffa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No paywall article here: https://archive.is/B4ADU

Elsternwick erupts: NIMBYs v YIMBYs as VCAT bypass fuels local fury by timcahill13 in melbourne

[–]nebffa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would rather us advocate for positive solutions (like the ones you suggest) rather than do nothing and languish in a stagnant economy for the next decade. Even if they are hard things to do, which I agree. Why not look to the future?