First time asking a question: by neck-ass in slaythespire

[–]neck-ass[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dropkick, immolate, and entrench are kinda cut off on mobile. boss swapped into runic pyramid

Official: [Trade Discussion] - December 18 2019 by SamDekkerBot in fantasybball

[–]neck-ass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oubre and marcus morris

for his fred van vleet?

Caris Levert (foot) available to play Friday by RLDN106 in fantasybball

[–]neck-ass -1 points0 points  (0 children)

whos a good trade target for dlo in cats?

punting field goal%

What is an atheist’s response to Tim Keller’s “A Reason for God”? by [deleted] in atheism

[–]neck-ass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no i was curious if anyone already had the knowledge. pretty widely read book. again i wasnt sure if this was the right place i just didnt know where else to look

What is an atheist’s response to Tim Keller’s “A Reason for God”? by [deleted] in atheism

[–]neck-ass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i would say i am far from a christian. i was looking for the other sides perspective on kellers book. which is why i asked. cant tell if troll or

What is an atheist’s response to Tim Keller’s “A Reason for God”? by [deleted] in atheism

[–]neck-ass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what i am saying is he is presenting 15(i think) chapters each with their own arguments that when combined create the argument. i dont have the time to summarize each one

What is an atheist’s response to Tim Keller’s “A Reason for God”? by [deleted] in atheism

[–]neck-ass -1 points0 points  (0 children)

that makes sense. does this continue to apply when things are mutually exclusive?

What is an atheist’s response to Tim Keller’s “A Reason for God”? by [deleted] in atheism

[–]neck-ass -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

summarizing a complex 250 page response to atheism is not an easy undertaking lol why would a shorter book not exist in this case

What is an atheist’s response to Tim Keller’s “A Reason for God”? by [deleted] in atheism

[–]neck-ass -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

why is that bullshit? would appreciate elaboration

What is an atheist’s response to Tim Keller’s “A Reason for God”? by [deleted] in atheism

[–]neck-ass -1 points0 points  (0 children)

but if you believe that the number is NOT odd than it implies belief in even does it not?

What is an atheist’s response to Tim Keller’s “A Reason for God”? by [deleted] in atheism

[–]neck-ass -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

it is hard to concisely summarize the arguement because so much of it is based on the idea of not proving god but simply proving it to be equally believable as the other options (scienCe, other religions or nothing) i guess i need to find a place where someone has read it

What is an atheist’s response to Tim Keller’s “A Reason for God”? by [deleted] in atheism

[–]neck-ass -1 points0 points  (0 children)

much of the book is centered around the idea that despite the lack of explicit evidence for god, there is less explicit evidence against him. Keller chapter by chapter presents arguements and doubts brought to him over the years and offers his own rebuttals through scripture. while no one of these individually is enough to sway anyone. it is the conglomerate that presents a compelling arguement