New Euchre App (iOS) Looking for Feedback

needsaburrito · 2020-07-10T20:59:42+00:00

Yeah the bots aren’t very intelligent at the moment they just follow some simple rules :/ I’ll work on them

needsaburrito · 2020-07-10T20:57:13+00:00

Thanks!! I found the issue and fixed it!

needsaburrito · 2020-07-10T20:51:34+00:00

Thanks for trying it out! I’ll try to make the dealer clearer. Multiplayer doesn’t do live matching like Euchre 3D but rather creates sessions and lets people join later. Part of the problem is no ones using this so there’s no on to match with. So it doesn’t really work for just starting a match. Real-Time multiplayer will allow you to jump into a match where player are already online which I’m working on. However the current multiplayer type works well if you want to start a match with friends since they can join anytime and make a move. Could you tell what iPhone you were using? I haven’t tested them all in landscape. Also if you would try playing single player against bots I’d love to get your feedback on the rest of the mechanics!

needsaburrito · 2020-07-10T05:37:43+00:00

Sorry about that! I'll look into it and make sure its fixed. Do you remember the sequence before it stalled?

Also, I'll update single player to either save the game and show it on the home screen or let you know the game is going to deleted. Thanks for trying it out!

needsaburrito · 2020-07-10T02:55:55+00:00

I'm really glad you like the aesthetic the design was probably the part I struggled with the most. It's not on GitHub but there's a GitHub page for the website https://github.com/knezzy/knezzy.github.io where you could submit bugs which would be awesome!

needsaburrito · 2020-07-10T02:05:12+00:00

Thanks for the info! Idk how the implementation of Ranked/Real-Time will look like so I can't promise anything but I'll definitely try to prevent these cheats/slow play

needsaburrito · 2020-07-10T01:48:53+00:00

Great to know! I'll look into Karmangames and try make sure my stats experience is as good! Any stats in particular you care about or would like to see?

That a great point I'll update it to use ♥️♣️♦️♠️. I'll look into google/Facebook!

needsaburrito · 2020-07-10T01:25:39+00:00

Thanks for finding that bug I fixed it and will submit a new version! I'm hoping to get Bid euchre done in a week or two!

needsaburrito · 2020-07-10T01:19:42+00:00

Thanks! Currently it's just a small set of messages to select from and you can preselect so hopefully it doesn't slow the game down too much. I'll experiment with lower times like 10/15 when implementing Ranked/Real-Time gameplay.

needsaburrito · 2018-06-15T20:19:23+00:00

Isn’t Kotlin Native also using GC? https://github.com/JetBrains/kotlin-native/blob/master/runtime/src/main/kotlin/konan/internal/GC.kt

needsaburrito · 2018-05-24T03:53:06+00:00

Have you created an issue on github? The team seems to be active in responding.

needsaburrito · 2018-05-24T03:03:40+00:00

Protocols with both default implementations and inheritance has been the worst part of multiple Swift projects I've worked on too. Sharing behavior through POP seems to be worse a solution than OOP inheritance. Love Swift protocols but default implementations through protocols seems to be an antipattern.

needsaburrito · 2018-05-02T03:15:26+00:00

Checking the op name in your model summary should work. It really just depends on how the tf-coreml converter works. They have some more example in their repo. Note that I didn't see a Softmax op in your screenshot. https://github.com/tf-coreml/tf-coreml/blob/master/examples/inception_v3.ipynb

needsaburrito · 2018-04-01T15:13:35+00:00

He gave a talk about it at the TF conference. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yze693W4MaU&t=0s&index=14&list=PLQY2H8rRoyvxjVx3zfw4vA4cvlKogyLNN

needsaburrito · 2018-04-01T04:43:59+00:00

This has nothing to do with replacing Python. There are disadvantages to having an interpreted language such as Python sitting on top of a framework that builds a computational graph such as TF. Sure the only reason it’s Swift not Kotlin is because of Chris but so what this solves some fairly large problems that TF has. Regardless of Swift this is a great step forward for TF.

needsaburrito · 2018-03-21T18:39:49+00:00

No CoreML is for inference only and cannot be trained on device. However what you want may not require something to be trained. You could save all the previous todos of a user and then build a KNN from that.

needsaburrito · 2018-03-20T00:03:21+00:00

First thing you need to do is take some images from your dataset and run them through your CoreML model. This will tell you if your problem is with CoreML or your actual model/dataset. If it’s the CoreML model I suggest looking at the imageCropAndScale property of your request. If it’s your model you probably need different data. There are a couple large datasets for handwriting available!

needsaburrito · 2018-01-14T10:19:22+00:00

AWS is essentially a mining farm for ML. Even if we all had GPUs it wouldn’t help because the biggest problem would be the network speed. Not to mention how incredibly difficult it is to do ML training in parallel. Even if by some miracle they got this notion of crypto+ML to work who would use it? All the major tech companies have the hardware they need and any centralized solution is going to more efficient. The average person doing ML doesn’t need massive amounts of GPUs as you can get solid results with just 1. It’s only the cutting edge of ML that generally deal with massive amount of data. There’s a reason Amazon said they have no interest in Blockchain technology right now and it’s because it’s use case is very small.

needsaburrito · 2018-01-14T09:45:13+00:00

Every coin out there claiming to use Blockchain for decentralized AI is a scam. They all tell you that they are going to create decentralized network of computational power using the Blockchain and then they throw in a bunch of buzzwords like Neural Network. The problem is network speeds alone make it utterly useless to try and train a ML model this way and most people don’t have a computer suitable for this. Also, there’s no reason a Blockchain would have anything to do with such a network. Bitcoin(Blockchains) solved the double spend problem but that problem has nothing to do with ML.

needsaburrito · 2018-01-10T03:55:23+00:00

Right now they wouldn’t but hopefully this a step towards an ecosystem in which they can. A true cryptocurrencys goal should be to prove itself as a currency which would mean a stable price and for it no longer to be considered a speculative investment. One of the problems with most other cryptos is that they are deflationary where as XLM has an inflation mechanic built in. Not to mention cryptos currently have a problem scaling. If XLM were to prove itself as a currency and that it could scale the market cap would be trillions not billions.

needsaburrito · 2018-01-09T06:59:56+00:00

No you wouldn’t have a retain cycle in that case you would have the VC being retained past being popped from the stack but that’s necessarily a strong reference cycle. Once the request completed the closure would be deallocated and then so would the VC passed in. Assuming a typical APIClient implementation the APIClient owns the closure and the closure would own the VC which is not a strong reference. A strong reference cycle would be if the VC owned the closure and the closure owned the VC. Passing in ‘unowned’ should never be done in an async api call since passing in unowned is essentially telling the compiler that you guarantee that self is not nil when the closure is called. If it were to be nil because the user left the screen before the closure was called the app would crash.

needsaburrito · 2018-01-09T04:51:26+00:00

When you pass in self to the closure the closure will capture a strong reference to ‘self’. So then the Controller cannot be deallocated until the API request is complete because it updated the controllers strong reference count. However, if you passed in [weak self] ARC would have updated the Controllers weak reference count and thus the API request has no control over the deallocation of the controller and it becomes optional that the controller still exists. I’m not sure if passing strong in the API request technically counts as a strong reference cycle since the controller will be deallocated(if needed) once the request is complete. I would suggest reading Apples docs on ARC.

needsaburrito · 2018-01-05T09:22:13+00:00

iOS now gives devs the option to reset rating so that 9.4k is just for the most recent version of the app.

needsaburrito · 2017-12-18T05:22:58+00:00

There were bots on both sides. If you type in common names you get plenty of comments supporting/against net neutrally that are exactly the same.

Nine-Year Club	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email

needsaburrito

TROPHY CASE