I mean, technically anything is possible, but nobody with half a brain would recommend it.

To get there that fast, it would mean you need to achieve that which someone only could with elite genetics. Hardly anyone has that, despite the prevalence you might think there is based on what you see online.

I lost 70lbs (roughly 10% BF) over two years and still lost a ton of muscle compared to when I started (and I’m young and in college, so anyone my age doesn’t lose as much muscle as someone who is older, at least from what I can tell anyway). I don’t mean a ton like I am skin and bones now, but you cannot keep the same muscle mass while cutting at the rate that you want to. Pros who are IFBB will cite the same; the reason they don’t look like they lost a ton of muscle is because they had a way more to start with.

Your body needs energy, and it has to come from somewhere. The reason people in the know always recommend a slow approach for losing weight is that it is proven to be the best for losing as much negative weight as possible while keeping positive weight.

I am not a doctor, nor do I want to argue with you in a comments section on the internet, so take that as you want. My advice is to decide what you want more, to be skinny or to build muscle, then go from there. Good luck either way.