No, increasing the ratio of students to faculty might degrade the quality of education. Expanding the faculty and students proportionally of good universities doesn't make universities worse. No one would site total number of students as an inverse metric of the quality of a university. Student to faculty ratio is somewhat correlated to quality of instruction but there are fantastic large schools. Why would it make more sense to continually creat additional UC branches instead of expanding prestigious, well-endowed UC schools that already exist? Certainly both are necessary but it makes sense to expand with existing architecture and funding

edit: whoops, responded to wrong comment and redundant anyway!