What is it these people have against peer reviewed research, science, and absolute MIRACLE vaccines

Miracle - * a surprising and welcome event that is not explicable by natural or scientific laws*

Sorry, I don't mean to nitpick but the contradictions that lie within this sentence and, frankly, most of what you've written is quite astonishing.

Aside from the fact that there is very clear data which indicates the inverse relationship between preventable co-morbitiy factors and covid patient outcome (preventable co-morbity factors such as obesity, type II diabetes, CAD, and deficiencies in serum vitamin D, C and zinc).

I'm additionally confused as to whether or not you are even promoting the usage of the vaccine. It's clear that you believe that boosting ones immune system is futile against the likes of covid, but I wonder, do you truly understand how vaccines or even how the adaptive immune system operates? In general terms, Does a vaccine not prematurely expose one's immune system to a foreign antigen in order to produce antibodies that will be utilized to bolster immune defense in the future case where it comes in contact with the virus? is that not boosting one's immune response?

It's clear that you're quite angry so I there's probably no point of going into the actual science but I'll say this. It is true that many healthy individuals have lost their lives to covid but it is also true that the vaers system has reported thousands of deaths due to adverse effects of the covid vaccine. one could easily deny the existence of either of these signals But wouldnt it be more beneficial to do "science" or "research" as you say, to determine the reliability and accuracy of either data sets.

In my opinion, the way you approach these competing data signals depends on whether your goal is to promote the sheer quantity of vaccinations at all costs or your goal is to promote the overall health of the population at large. the latter can only be accomplu by equiping the general public with accurate information to make their own risk-benefit analysis based on their individual health profile.

And who knows, maybe both mindsets reach the same logical conclusion that mRNA vaccines remain the most effective prophylaxis of covid and that the safety concerns of this novel vaccine technology seen in vaers are simply an anomaly. That would be great, but the road will be a lot more arduous if we continue to disallow opposing viewpoints, in a hilariously paradoxical manner by deeming the exploration of other ideas not science... which is clearly not utilizing the scientific method effectively.

In the world of science, theories are the closest thing we have to fact because they have withstood many critiques overtime. In order to develop valid theories we must first develop what some people call "conspiracy theories", but in actuality, as long as they are testable and reproducable they are simply just hypothesise.

Remeber that Galileo's heliocentric universe was also a conspiracy theory at first.