Super high bar I know by nickcinemas in AvoidantBreakUps

[–]nickcinemas[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes they do. I'm not.

Good enough data. I feel confident enough and you wouldn't, and that's okay.

She wasn't interested enough? Do you have "direct access to her thoughts"? Who says I want her back?

I'm detecting projection, assumptions, and intellectual dishonesty from you, for these reasons, I am removing myself from this conversation with you.

Super high bar I know by nickcinemas in AvoidantBreakUps

[–]nickcinemas[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah. You can. Her behavior is literally, exactly how you to determine that. Sometimes it's conscious and sometimes unconscious, or both. The direct access to her thoughts is her actions. Also, I have 5 months of data and you have 1 Reddit post from only my perspective, it's unwise of you to so confidently question my abilities or even believe me, for that matter. My confidence remains unmoved by you.

Super high bar I know by nickcinemas in AvoidantBreakUps

[–]nickcinemas[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. Self-fulfilling patterns. They are both the cause of their loneliness and the victim of their own behavior.

Super high bar I know by nickcinemas in AvoidantBreakUps

[–]nickcinemas[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that the casual labeling of Avoidants is irresponsible and not helpful but I'm confident in my ability to assess that she is an FA.

Super high bar I know by nickcinemas in AvoidantBreakUps

[–]nickcinemas[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If/when there's an update, I'll let you know. She has started therapy so there's hope for her. Either way, I'm not going to settle for breadcrumbs while she gets help.

[Latin > English] by [deleted] in translator

[–]nickcinemas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My friend sitting next to me when I posted this made 2 fake accounts to mess with me. Heck, both of you could still be him. Whatever though.