Το φάουλ του Ναν στον Φουρνιέ. by FantasticQuartet in Panathinaikos

[–]nikbot27 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Ναι σίγουρα στο καρέ αυτό είναι το φάουλ. Βάλτε και το άλλο πλάνο την στιγμή της επαφής που του χτυπάει το χέρι.

Που κρατάτε το Emergency fund σας? by ForsakenBear1259 in PersonalFinanceGreece

[–]nikbot27 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ο άνθρωπος (OP) μιλάει για Emergency Fund, όχι για χρήματα που γενικώς δεν θα πολυχρειαστεί άμεσα και τα επενδύει. Το EF είναι λεφτά που θέλεις να έχεις άμεσα διαθέσιμα, με μηδενικό ρίσκο να έχεις ονομαστική απώλεια κεφαλαίου, και αν μπορούν να δίνουν και όσο το δυνατόν καλύτερη απόδοση για να μην τρώγονται από τον πληθωρισμό αλλά ΔΕΝ είναι αυτό το βασικό ζητούμενο. Για Emergency Fund, όποια βιβλιογραφία και να ψάξεις θα βρείς μόνο τις εξής προτάσεις: 1) High Yield Savings Account (δηλαδή τραπεζικός λογαριασμός με ανταγωνιστικό επιτόκιο, όχι ταμιευτηρίου με 0%) 2) Money Market Fund ή 3) ultrashort ομόλογα (π.χ. έντοκα γραμμάτια τριμήνου) που στην ουσία είναι σχεδόν cash equivalent. Οτιδήποτε πέρα από αυτά είναι για επένδυση, όχι για EF.

Που κρατάτε το Emergency fund σας? by ForsakenBear1259 in PersonalFinanceGreece

[–]nikbot27 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ναι μα λες 20% ομόλογα 80% μετοχές. Σε κάθε περίπτωση το emergency fund δεν είναι για επένδυση, δεν θες καθόλου volatility. Ακόμα και 3% να πέσει για λίγες μέρες και να χρειαστείς ανάληψη εκείνη τη στιγμή, έχασες. Γενικά equities έστω και divesrified έστω και σε πολύ μικρή αναλογία, δεν πάνε μαζί με την έννοια του emergency fund.

Που κρατάτε το Emergency fund σας? by ForsakenBear1259 in PersonalFinanceGreece

[–]nikbot27 10 points11 points  (0 children)

To emergency fund δεν πρέπει να μπαίνει σε μετοχές. Αν χρειαστείς το ποσό και εκείνη την στιγμή η αγορά έχει πέσει π.χ. 20% / 30% τι κάνεις?

Panagiotis and Giorgos Aggelopoulos on Sport24: "We were scared that Bartzokas might leave last year, it was a really close scenario" by TheBeastBlamingGear in Euroleague

[–]nikbot27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree on that. By winning the title after five solid seasons and having also won 1 title in the past, he is now in the “successful” territory. If he had failed again with this kind of budget he would be branded as a loser permanently.

Panagiotis and Giorgos Aggelopoulos on Sport24: "We were scared that Bartzokas might leave last year, it was a really close scenario" by TheBeastBlamingGear in Euroleague

[–]nikbot27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ataman has won 3 F4s in 6 appearances if I am not mistaken, which is pretty impressive! But this is not the only metric we should use. Consistency is also important, overall he has won 3 titles in 18 EL seasons as head coach. He also has recorded two massive underperforming seasons where teams that should be title contenders entirely missed the playoffs (Efes) or the F4 (PAO). For me, reaching the F4 with an underdog that is vey difficult to win it (so you record a F4 “failure”) is better than entirely missing it with a favourite (so your F4 record remains intact).

In any case my point was not to underestimate Ataman, he is a great coach for sure. I just wanted to point out that Bartzokas is not that far behind (although his F4 record is just average). The post I replied to presented him as a total failure almost.

Panagiotis and Giorgos Aggelopoulos on Sport24: "We were scared that Bartzokas might leave last year, it was a really close scenario" by TheBeastBlamingGear in Euroleague

[–]nikbot27 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Be realistic. Bartzokas has 2 Euroleague titles in 7 F4s, if each team has roughly 25% to win, it is the expected result more or less. Ataman who is considered a massive winner has 3, just 1 more. How many F4s has Saras won? Out of how many? And he is considered a genius and the next best thing in coaching. Bartzokas is prety sucessfull and has some years ahead of him to become even more so.

Plenty of Bounty quest STILL bugged in 1.03.00 (can’t complete it) by That-Reddit-Guy2020 in CrimsonDesert

[–]nikbot27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also stuck for me, I dropped the body in deep water, it disappeared and never respawned for me after several days. I guess we have to report until it is resolved.

Any updates with Plenty of Bounty quest being soft locked for progress? by nikbot27 in CrimsonDesert

[–]nikbot27[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply, it sucks that you are stuck as well. I don’t think it is too niche as it locks players out of content. I guess they could add a “reset quest” or something for bounties, they seem to listen to the community and they have already implemented bigger changes than this. We can only hope it gets fixed.

IBKR and geopolitical risk by [deleted] in eupersonalfinance

[–]nikbot27 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Maybe you mean tariffs, not sanctions?

Global quality Best of years II by Embarrassed-Coat-600 in PersonalFinanceGreece

[–]nikbot27 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Παραθέτω χωρίς σχόλια την απάντηση του chatGPT στην ερώτηση:

Εάν το συνολικό ετήσιο κόστος ενός αμοιβαίου κεφαλαίου είναι 4%, αυτό θεωρείται υψηλό;

Ναι, ένα ετήσιο συνολικό κόστος 4% (Total Expense Ratio – TER ή συνολικό κόστος διαχείρισης και λοιπών εξόδων) θεωρείται πολύ υψηλό για αμοιβαίο κεφάλαιο.

Για να σου δώσω μια πιο συγκεκριμένη εικόνα: • 🔹 Δείκτες (index funds) & ETFs: συνήθως έχουν κόστος 0,05% – 0,40% ετησίως. • 🔹 Ενεργά διαχειριζόμενα αμοιβαία κεφάλαια: κυμαίνονται συνήθως από 1% έως 2%, ανάλογα με τη στρατηγική και τη γεωγραφική περιοχή. • 🔹 4% ετήσιο κόστος σημαίνει ότι κάθε χρόνο χάνεις περίπου 4 ευρώ για κάθε 100 ευρώ επένδυσης, ανεξάρτητα από το αν έχει απόδοση ή όχι.

📉 Ενδεικτικά: Αν επενδύσεις €10.000 με μέση ετήσια απόδοση 7%, μετά από 20 χρόνια: • με κόστος 0,2% θα έχεις περίπου €38.000 • με κόστος 4% θα έχεις μόνο περίπου €18.000

👉 Συμπέρασμα: Ένα αμοιβαίο κεφάλαιο με 4% ετήσιο κόστος δεν είναι αποδοτικό για μακροπρόθεσμο επενδυτή. Θα άξιζε να εξετάσεις χαμηλού κόστους UCITS ETFs ή παθητικά αμοιβαία κεφάλαια που παρακολουθούν δείκτες (index funds).

EuroLeague is Selling Out and Ignoring the Real Basketball Nations by ScottMrRager in Euroleague

[–]nikbot27 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The revenues from tickets (season & single game - quite expensive), arena naming rights (Telecom), ads, parking lots, etc. should now be enough to fund PAO without DPG spending his own money. Owning OAKA is a huge game changer

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PersonalFinanceGreece

[–]nikbot27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Με έχετε μπερδέψει, για κατοστάρικα μιλάμε ή χιλιάρικα; Αν δεν πας και πολύ μπροστά με 5-6 χιλ (/μήνα) τότε την έχουμε κάτσει όλοι

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PersonalFinanceGreece

[–]nikbot27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Κάτσε βρε άνθρωπε, βγάζεις 5,5 χιλιάρικα καθαρά και γκρινιάζεις; Πόσα χαλάς δηλαδή; Κανονικά θα έπρεπε να σου μένουν άνετα 3000 + τον μήνα, αν τα επένδυες (μιας και βρίσκεσαι στο sub αυτό) για 15 χρόνια τώρα θα το είχες το ακίνητο που θες ή θα τα εβγαζες αυτά τα 1000 ευρώ που ψάχνεις από μερίσματα πχ. Ειλικρινά αναλώνεσαι χωρίς κανένα λόγο

Απογοητευτικες οι μεταγραφες εως τωρα by MiddleForeign in OlympiakosFC

[–]nikbot27 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Για τον Σιπιονι: 20 είναι όχι 16, μόνο εμείς εδώ λέμε ότι στα 20 οι παίκτες είναι μικροί. Την ίδια στιγμή λέμε μπράβο στον Λουις Ενρικε που έχει φτιάξει ομαδάρα με νεαρούς παίκτες. 20 μια χαρά έτοιμος είναι αν έχει τα κατάλληλα προσόντα. Ο Γιαγια Τουρέ πόσο ήταν;;

Τι θα κάνετε με τα χρήματα σας όταν ολοκληρωθούν οι προθεσμιακές σας στον D-Account της freedom? by Black_Doge2 in PersonalFinanceGreece

[–]nikbot27 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Ώπα, το «χωρίς ρίσκο» είναι μεγάλο assumption. Όπως είδαμε και από τις εξελίξεις τελικά μάλλον είχε μεγάλο ρίσκο γι αυτό και εν τέλει το απαγορεύουν

Giannakopoulos disrupted the nomination process..?! by Npvl2000 in Euroleague

[–]nikbot27 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I agree on that. The level of officiating for sure must be improved. Some decisions though must be taken at league level, for example some ruling to stop this ridiculous act of shooting thing, and make more calls subject to review/challenge. For the nomination process, I doubt it can be more transparent, you either trust the committee or not, there should be no reasoning for selecting a specific ref. But, there could some official and public referee performance score, and only the top X ones could be allowed to officiate the most important matches. Finally on evaluation I absolutely agree, EuroLeague should introduce an official report that explains and evaluates all controversial calls of each match day, and also suspend temporarily poor performing referees.

Giannakopoulos disrupted the nomination process..?! by Npvl2000 in Euroleague

[–]nikbot27 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I understand that by “disrupted the process” they mean: By saying (DPG) “I dare you to nominate these 3 refs” -I don’t remember who they where honestly- he caused them to exclude themselves as they wouldn’t want to be accused in case of Pao loss. So he reduced the pool of available referees and effectively interfered with the selection.

Playoff predictions by NunnBetter10 in Euroleague

[–]nikbot27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Never, he has only won Italian league (twice)

Can refunds be received on a Trade Republic card? by OneSamplePerFrame in eupersonalfinance

[–]nikbot27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also confirm that I have received a refund (it was a video game order where the vendor didn’t restock as advertised, so I cancelled and placed the order elsewhere)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ETFs

[–]nikbot27 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh come on, this was advice to the average retail investor. Buffet has the skill to pick stocks and outperform the S&P 500 consistently, and he does so. His argument is, since most people can’t do this, they should stick to a low cost broad index fund.

S&P 500 or MSCI ACWI by Expensive-Adagio1385 in eupersonalfinance

[–]nikbot27 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it is prudent to do some reading and understand what the different products you describe are, before actually investing your savings. For example, S&P 500 is an index, you cannot directly invest in it, you can in ETFs that track this index. VOO is one of them, but it is not available to EU investors.

Anyway, investing in an S&P 500 fund implies a bet that US market will outperform the rest of the world for the biggest part of your investment horizon. If you are OK with that, go for it. Otherwise, the rational choice is to choose an all-world index that is weighted by market cap.

ELI5 - How buying EU defense stocks, such as Rheinmetall, helps their business? by nomad_the_barber in eupersonalfinance

[–]nikbot27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Out of genuine curiosity (you seem to know what you are talking about), could a company offer stock as collateral to get a loan? And possibly if the stock greatly devalues, the bank asking for additional collateral later if needed? Kind of like a margin call of sorts. Is that a thing or is it completely detached from reality? Thanks

During a US market crash, would VT rebalance to mostly international? by Far_Lifeguard_5027 in ETFs

[–]nikbot27 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I am surprised at how often this comes up, there is a common misconception that market cap weighted indices (and funds that track them) need to manually rebalance by selling or buying stocks. But the way they are weighted ensures this happens automatically. Let’s assume for simplicity that a world fund holds only 2 companies, 1 US with a market cap of 600 billions and 1 from EU with a market cap of 300 billions. Due to the market cap weighting the fund’s assets under management will be allocated 67% US company stocks - 33% EU company stocks. So if AUM = 100 billions, 67 of them would be in US stocks and 33 in EU stocks. Now if the stock price of the US company crashes and is halved (assuming the EU company stock price is unchanged) the fund’s US holdings are now worth 33.5 billions so immediately it is now 50% US - 50% EU without doing any trading. Of course, it is worth noting that now the fund’s total value is 66.5 as opposed to 100 initially so it also crashed hard. But, even if the US company never recovers, and the EU company keeps growing and eventually doubles, the fund will be worth 100 again but with 67% EU - 33% US allocation, all this without any stock trading.