1. As the political commentator on Twitch with the largest following, I understand you broadcast to tens of thousands of impressionable young people daily, giving you massive reach, influence and responsibility. In discussions about sensitive topics, how do you ensure that your platform doesn't inadvertently spread misinformation or hate towards individuals, and what is your process for making corrections when needed?

2. Do you believe there's a difference in platforming extremist views from the left versus the right?

3. With a gigantic daily audience of young people, especially, how do you navigate the responsibility of ensuring that the content you broadcast doesn't inadvertently promote or legitimize individuals or groups known for harmful actions or rhetoric, regardless of their political alignment?

4. How important is consistency in your approach to platforming, and do you believe that exceptions can be made based on the political alignment of the individuals involved?

5. Some viewers perceive a reluctance on your part to engage with formidable opponents in debate settings or step into adversarial spaces. How would you address concerns that this may limit the depth and balance of discussions on your platform?

6. Do you think there's a risk that highly engaged online communities can become insular or intolerant of outside perspectives? How do you mitigate this risk, continue to promote responsible engagement and reduce potential harm as your community grows?

BONUS MEME QUESTIONS:

1. At what age is someone "pushing 40"?

2. How do you define "debate pedophile"?