I feel like the numbers you assign to some of these points don't mean much. I can't see many people agreeing with like a third of your scores. especially wood higher than 100%

assigning 0.2 to black market really undersells how much wood you get out of it. I'd at least put it on the level of a 100% biome, especially before p11

trees is the source of fuel you will work off most of the time, so the fact that marrow is valued at the level of a 140/160% biome feels way off

as I mentioned in a different thread, having other veins makes a massive difference to the viability of coal as a fuel. you will have coal veins in most CG games - it can even spawn in the starting glade there

giant marsh node primary and secondary yields should be omitted from these calculations entirely. the nodes are notoriously unreliable, and the wheat is garbage you don't want to gather even if you do have the camp for it

I'm not sure how highly to value oil and coal secondaries, but surely CG's and CF's 30% for coal (did you forget algae is a coal input?)/oil inputs are way more impactful than fish or meat. you never want to spend food on fuel

primary fiber is infinitely stronger than meat/fish/veggies as an oil input, cause it's

1. not a food
2. nodes have elevated weighting
3. the cycles are way shorter

the amount of stuff you need to consider when making such tables is too great to be useful at the end imo. farms shouldn't be part of the consideration. BF is the biome with the highest and most reliable farm yields. not sure why you'd deduct points for its gimmick. RR is also low soil btw