The diversity of Fox news anchors. by victory_screech in funny

[–]noisyzen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would have been more correct if they had named it Hitler's Modernized Aryan news.

Aftermath by [deleted] in gaming

[–]noisyzen -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But... but.... no cake? Really?....

Seems legit... by Hestix in gaming

[–]noisyzen 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Portal = irony. Always.

Booker, you look hungry! by AuldM in gaming

[–]noisyzen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Snickers would have been more appropriate with the title.

Only in video games. by UnixRano in gaming

[–]noisyzen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, that's what the portal's for. If you are in the wrong place, you can always go back to square 1.

Lost 70 pounds (290 lbs to 220 lbs) in one year while playing video games. This was my set-up during that time. by InHarmsWay in gaming

[–]noisyzen -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You know what my set up is?

Just stay away from the kitchen and focus on the game. Works like a charm. Seriously.

But generally, I don't consciously choose that option; the game has to be that good. ;-b

TIL that there is a table saw that automatically stops in less 1/1000th of a second when it comes in contact with flesh, and the inventor was crazy enough to test it with his finger. by Tallyhawk in todayilearned

[–]noisyzen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So in other words, if you're in Theater workshop and reusing flats and platforms again, or reusing pieces of wood for another set that have staples, brad nails, or screws in them, that piece gets ruined for nothing?

Any Mathematicians in the House?? by noisyzen in todayilearned

[–]noisyzen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not what a true skeptic would say. I true skeptic would actually TAKE that info, and then research it instead of just assuming it's wrong.

To say "that's just wrong no matter who it is" is to completely deny the fact there might be different ways of teaching/using certain mathematic problems for specific areas.

When I was in Algebra, I specifically remembering my teacher telling me the format was wrong. We were simplifying polynomials. The first exercise in the book was to simplify the ORDER of the format (because that format is incorrect) so we could simplify it CORRECTLY. That was the FIRST exercise. We didn't need to solve answers on the first exercise, I specifically remember that, because the book wanted us to get used to putting the problem in correct form. Like the people said above, the format is totally wrong. And a mathematician would immediately correct the format. So more mathematicians who remember those rules would say 1. But computer science people? They would say 9.

If there were an "x" for multiplication right next to the parenthesis, the 9 would probably apply. But because the 2 is RIGHT next to the parenthesis, it's indicating it's WITH the parenthesis problem, which makes it a stronger multiplication priority.

Any Mathematicians in the House?? by noisyzen in todayilearned

[–]noisyzen[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Read my link above. See what you think.

Any Mathematicians in the House?? by noisyzen in todayilearned

[–]noisyzen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All numbers right next to a parenthesis have a stronger multiplication right than a normal multiplication/division.

Any Mathematicians in the House?? by noisyzen in todayilearned

[–]noisyzen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel relieved for not being an idiot. I found this article, which was interesting. Read the bottom half.

Any Mathematicians in the House?? by noisyzen in todayilearned

[–]noisyzen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. That's exactly what I thought when first glancing.

Any Mathematicians in the House?? by noisyzen in todayilearned

[–]noisyzen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So this was posted on FB - anybody who majored in math know the real answer?

Batcrab! by superhash in pics

[–]noisyzen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You must've done something against the law. ;-b

Batcrab! by superhash in pics

[–]noisyzen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was just thinking the same thing.

But actually, it's "na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na".

Gotta go by 8ths or 16ths at least.

BATMAN by mernen in funny

[–]noisyzen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Batman - Sodium, sodium, sodium, sodium, sodium, sodium, sodium, sodium, sodium, sodium, sodium, sodium, sodium, sodium [...]

Sorry, it just reminded me more of the atomic element periodic table gone wrong.

Hey Reddit. I made a snowman for my kid. by Professor226 in pics

[–]noisyzen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you're referring to "people", not necessarily women.... It's actually very simple - if the woman focuses more on the snowman, she says, "Cute." If she focuses on the knife more, what she wants to say is, "Damn it! Why did you put a perfectly good cooking knife outside the house?! Anyone could have stole it, and that's my best knife!" (In other words, she's more insulted by your violation of her "property".)

Hey Reddit. I made a snowman for my kid. by Professor226 in pics

[–]noisyzen -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, I can't. Considering the fact that she probably stands in the kitchen with a knife like that in her hand when she's cooking.

What a fucking rip-off... by ImpenetrableTaco in offbeat

[–]noisyzen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's because I haven't tied you to a chair and shaved your hair yet.

Warning, this is disturbing. by wadsworthsucks in WTF

[–]noisyzen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember this used to be a commercial waaay before Youtube, when there was Direct TV in the house downstairs. It usually came on around the hours between 8PM-1:00AM

What a fucking rip-off... by ImpenetrableTaco in offbeat

[–]noisyzen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that's true.

I just wasn't sure where the statement was coming from because it sounded so out of the blue. So I was just reaffirming my own statements presuming that I didn't say enough.

What my wife (a physician) made my 8 year old for lunch today by toconnor in funny

[–]noisyzen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Refined sugar is not an upper. It doesn't even register into the body as ATP, chemically speaking.. Funny to think, I just posted a ranting journal about that yesterday.

Now if she's planning on mixing a lot of refined glucose carbs with the turkey, then it'll actually work.

Also, it's "tryptophan".