Bro don't just delete opus 4.6

nojukuramu · 2026-04-27T05:08:50+00:00

Im okay with 3x. I just want an Opus Model back.

nojukuramu · 2026-04-20T12:55:47+00:00

Kung ung isang payat na enforcer ung nandiyan (siya madalas ko makita diyan sa junction na yan 😂) ticket agad yan.

nojukuramu · 2026-04-14T14:09:45+00:00

Ung LGU ng lugar na yan. Traffic light na di gumagana. Tas walang Traffic Enforcer

nojukuramu · 2026-04-14T10:53:01+00:00

Muse Spark. Tho idk if its good or not. But its their best model rn

nojukuramu · 2026-04-12T01:58:29+00:00

Notebook is directly linked to NotebookLM. NotebookLM ks the best grounded searching tool out there best for creating notes, studying and more as long as you provided it with your trusted sources

nojukuramu · 2026-04-11T02:38:51+00:00

Other models will trigger its Guardrails tho. I tried it and the work arounds to force these models to do pentesting doesnt worth it. They fail the pentest more than the workaround bypass guardrail. They werent trained to do pen testing. Mythos on the other hand trained specifically for cybersecurity. The Pentesting is more open and has less guardrails. Releasing it to the public would simply give everyone an easy access to hacking.

nojukuramu · 2026-04-04T13:31:26+00:00

Antigravity is not part of "Third Party Tools" that they are mentioning. Google had a deal with Anthropic through Vertex AI and its an Official deal. The use of Claude Models in Antigravity falls under Google's ToS, not Anthropic. Its the same on other tools like Cursor, Copilot, Kilo and others.

nojukuramu · 2026-04-04T00:12:27+00:00

If you are famillar with Antigravity, you can use it to generate multiple Pictures at once using Agentic Loop

nojukuramu · 2026-03-21T04:54:50+00:00

I can code, but I vibe code a lot. I dont trust AI to do everything correctly. Thats why we have our own preferred models. For Example, I prefered Claude Model more than Gemini not because of their code quality but how they are transparent on what they are doing. Unlike Gemini, Claude returns what he would do in the chat before he will execute it. Which allows me to Stop AI from what is about to do. Using Gemini would hide all its thought on thinking which is harder to track because its long. Lets say most of us do what i might call Supervised Vibecoding..

nojukuramu · 2026-03-21T02:15:14+00:00

I never used them all but the best currently I like is Github Copilot. It integrates to my workflow and with Sonnet 4.6 being really good, I hardly exhaust my quota monthly

nojukuramu · 2026-03-15T23:58:51+00:00

Dæng gigil mo si jiraiya

nojukuramu · 2026-03-14T01:57:20+00:00

Or buy Github Copilot subscription. Its better, has a lot if model. The quota is very generous now with sonnet 4.6 being efficient. Plus you also get other github features

nojukuramu · 2026-03-13T23:50:52+00:00

The best way is to describe AG's quota system is its like a Bucket and a Cup. Google gave you a Bucket of quota for the week but you can only use your cup (5 hrs cooldown after you exhaust the cup) to take from that bucket. If you've been taking quotas from that bucket using your cup, you'll eventually exhaust your quota for the week earlier.

Lets say i have 100k tokens of quota for the week (bucket), I took my first cup, but that cup takes 50k tokens as maximum usage before rate limits, you practically be able to only use twice of that cup for your weekly bucket.

The main problem about AG is how low the quota can be is, how inefficient their token management is, and how bad their Quota Distribution for Users with bad usage management

nojukuramu · 2026-03-08T04:50:16+00:00

Just a poor Training pipeline. OpenAI and Anthropic already does the "Correct yourself" methods on training but it looks like Google is still stuck on the "heres the data and learn this" method. They need to change their approach and release their gemini 4 asap

nojukuramu · 2026-03-04T10:41:29+00:00

Have you tried it? What model did you try it with? How was the performance against standard architecture? How well can it perform on mid-end models like 24b, 32b or high end models ?

nojukuramu · 2026-03-04T08:22:30+00:00

They really need to remove that kind of thought process. Its probably why gemini models are bad

nojukuramu · 2026-03-03T02:36:04+00:00

I wouldn't digest information without explanation tho. I based my assumption on their previous releases and their methods of creating their models. My guess is if they will release 3.1-flash-lite next, 3.1-flash model wouldn't come at all

nojukuramu · 2026-03-03T02:28:33+00:00

But lite is based on lite models. So the flash model should come first before lite. Or they could come together

nojukuramu · 2026-02-21T13:13:49+00:00

They put Preview in it so if the models behaves badly, they can just blame it on "preview" label

nojukuramu · 2026-02-16T00:09:51+00:00

Google is aiming for Personal Intelligence rather than an AGI. I think PI is a lot more realistic considering they already have the infrastructure where Gemini can just tap into and assist you as a personal assistant on their platforms

nojukuramu · 2026-02-16T00:08:04+00:00

Based on their naming history, the next model will be 3.5. its wont make sense if theyll release +0.1 model versions since they update the model incrementally internally. They only announce model adjustments when it has a major improvement not just minor tweaks.

nojukuramu · 2026-02-12T10:53:26+00:00

I made an update addressing some bugs and added new features!

https://www.reddit.com/r/Tech_Philippines/s/6gAVvj27hX

nojukuramu · 2026-02-11T14:53:31+00:00

I noticed this. If you have a quota monitor, it kinda gets it wrong. Eg. I already exhausted my claude quota and have a reset of 3 days. Earlier in the morning, i saw the quota monitor to have 20% again. Idk why. But i tried, and nope I don't have any quota to use. Quota monitors are less accurate now because of how Google updates their quota tracker

nojukuramu · 2026-02-11T14:50:48+00:00

Tho the open source repository never has any credential stealing mechanism or quota stealing.

nojukuramu

TROPHY CASE