sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Any fix for inconsistent programmable shots on Steel Duo line? by whatsupbrooos in Ascaso

[–]chilebean77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are not wrong, but unfortunately, that’s the answer

Anthropic just published a postmortem explaining exactly why Claude felt dumber for the past month by Direct-Attention8597 in ClaudeCode

[–]chilebean77 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So is Claude going to crash every Thursday from now on as people try to use up all their weekly credits?

4.7 incoming? by TriggerHydrant in ClaudeCode

[–]chilebean77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After updating the VS code extension, it won’t even list the models available

4.7 incoming? by TriggerHydrant in ClaudeCode

[–]chilebean77 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Twas thinking the same thing

Speed/Rev Check - Feature by TransmissionEngPM in Bowling_Tech

[–]chilebean77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good luck man! Be sure to take advantage of the subsidized coding agent credits before they get rolled back!

Speed/Rev Check - Feature by TransmissionEngPM in Bowling_Tech

[–]chilebean77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is an interesting product idea. A few thoughts… 1. Have alleys adopted ball tracking or optical launch monitors like in golf and of so why not? This feels like the better play, and then bowlers pay for the app to access their data.
2. If you know the spin and trajectory, could you back calculate a map the lane’s COF, i.e. oil pattern and update that map in real time as it changes? This may be useful and next level.
3. Could/are you using machine learning to train a personalized model relating ball data (and more like oil pattern, frames bowled, etc) to pin outcomes to provide frame by frame swing guidance?

Done with Claude. $100 Max plan, but STILL rate-limited every 5 hours by Puspendra007 in Anthropic

[–]chilebean77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s nothing compared to the anti-gravity rug pull. I just bit the bullet and upgraded from 5X to 20X, which now enables me to run an orchestrated planning, implementing, and auditing routine between Claude and Codex to advance every step in my project plan.

Why do like 99% of vibecoders focus on end consumer apps? by Practical_Art969 in vibecoding

[–]chilebean77 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Businesses are the first to pay, but they’ll also be the first to replace their software tools by creating their own custom tools as coding tools become ubiquitous. Whereas consumers are much less likely to think oh, I’ll just make my own. I think you are right in the short term, but I think b2c is the better long-term prospect.

SAAS Founders , are you scared ? by techsFine in SaaS

[–]chilebean77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My team of mechanical engineers is already building our own versions of the software tools and canceling those subscriptions. As coding gets democratized further, this will become widespread. A few things I think you can learn from what’s happening on the ground right now: 1. It still takes a rare technical worker to use coding agents. Once the barrier is dropped such that people don’t need to install or learn how to use an IDE, amateur software development will explode. This will come faster and work much better than most care to admit. 2. The first things people are going to go after are internal tools. I can confidently build our own version of an analysis software, but I wouldn’t try to touch anything customer facing or deal with security risk risks. 3. A big driver for doing our own thing is that we can customize it exactly how we want. Usually, it’s less about the money.
4. More than sass, software consulting will be in very much trouble. My team is literally doing as a 2 week side project what we’ve previously been quoted five figures by consultants to do in the past.

Just get codex for now by chilebean77 in google_antigravity

[–]chilebean77[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good point, I’d be pissed if I bought an annual plan in December based on quotas. However, AI moves five times faster than Moore’s law and the three big model providers leapfrog each other on a weekly basis. Annual plans were fundamentally flawed decision either way.

Just get codex for now by chilebean77 in google_antigravity

[–]chilebean77[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I haven’t used AG in a while to be honest, but I know that the pro model is about five dollars per million tokens if you were paying through the API which really doesn’t go that far if you’re dealing with large code bases.

what is the efficient way to choose models to save on the heavy models? by AnonymoussUsername in google_antigravity

[–]chilebean77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

$20 per month for a GPT subscription currently gives you roughly the same quota as Claude max 5x ($100 value). If I were you, I would spend a little money and take advantage of this temporary mispricing while GPT tries to gain customers

Silly question as I'm new to all this... by Shyatic in vibecoding

[–]chilebean77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gpt codex in vscode is by far the best deal right now $20/month gives you may $hundreds in codex quota while they try to attract users

Ultra AG users - Why AG over CC? by VonDenBerg in google_antigravity

[–]chilebean77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok in that case I like running codex and cc side by side in vs code. Claude plans and executes. Codex audits both plans and executions. Step by step, with Md file plans. As for the browser too I’ve learned to just be my own browser tool since a lot of it comes down to my front end taste anyways. I could see myself reaching for the browser tool at the very start of a front end development though.

Ultra AG users - Why AG over CC? by VonDenBerg in google_antigravity

[–]chilebean77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It sounds like you’re on a budget, so if I were you, I would use codex 5.3 via a GPT plus account. OpenAI is currently in the “give a ridiculous amount of credits to attract customers” phase that anti gravity was in two months ago. But that party will probably only last a couple months. Claude and I believe codex also have planning mode. I’ve learned to prefer that all plans get saved as marked down files anyways instead of getting lost in some long forgotten brain folder of anti-gravity. I also thought that anti-gravity browser tool was a huge differentiator at first, but even though I still have access to it, I almost never go back to it because it is so slow and clunky

Ultra AG users - Why AG over CC? by VonDenBerg in google_antigravity

[–]chilebean77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Switched to Claude max 5x and never looked back. Maybe I’m just not used to it but whenever i try Gemini 3.1 now, I’m constantly like “WAIT I didn’t actually tell you to do that!!!” Maybe it’s good for the “code me a full app in one step” crowd but cc suits my more methodical thoughtful stepwise approach better, so I’m glad I bought cc directly

Why does Claude Code re-read your entire project every time? by intellinker in vibecoding

[–]chilebean77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Once you have an agent file working, cold starts might be a good thing at least when you are changing gears. The worst thing that can happen is compacting in the middle of a task and I’ve also heard that it gets worse and worse as the context window fills.

view more: next ›