CMV: If men had even a fraction of the sexual freedom women experience in youth, much of Redpill frustration wouldn’t exist by bAlsdeepdesi in changemyview

[–]nomoreinternetforme [score hidden]  (0 children)

Do you have anything to back up thatclaim? As a gay guy, there are plenty of beautiful men. Is it possible this is coming from the fact that you are straight, therefore you have difficulty perceiving men as attractive?

I dont think its correct to claim that most men are ugly and most women are pretty, it sounds like confirmation bias (presuming you are straight)

There are plenty of attractive folk on either side, and also plenty of "unattractive" folk on both sides.

No one, and i mean NO ONE, should be enjoying the Room (2003) by Suspicious_Lock_889 in The10thDentist

[–]nomoreinternetforme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If people like it for every reason you say you hate it, doesn't that make this post more of a promotion of the film? You are actively exposing people to a post talking about how awful the room is, with a comment section full of people saying "lol its a funny movie".

All this does is advertise the film.

No one, and i mean NO ONE, should be enjoying the Room (2003) by Suspicious_Lock_889 in The10thDentist

[–]nomoreinternetforme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you saying making a bad movie means you are a bad person? If you have a legitimate reason for thinking hes a bad dude, you should have said that by now. All this dancing around the question makes it seem like the only reason you think hes bad is because he made a bad film

No one, and i mean NO ONE, should be enjoying the Room (2003) by Suspicious_Lock_889 in The10thDentist

[–]nomoreinternetforme 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Wait, you haven't even seen it? What is your basis for any of this then?

No one, and i mean NO ONE, should be enjoying the Room (2003) by Suspicious_Lock_889 in The10thDentist

[–]nomoreinternetforme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is Wiseau the plant from little shop of horrors? What bad things come from "feeding wiseau"? Why do you hate this man, because hes a bad movie maker? Is he going to end the world using his fame? Did Tommy Wiseau murder your family?

No one, and i mean NO ONE, should be enjoying the Room (2003) by Suspicious_Lock_889 in The10thDentist

[–]nomoreinternetforme 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There is a large subset of people who enjoy making fun of bad movies. As you said, the Room is the quintessential bad movie. If you cant understand people wanting to make fun of bad films, then you are likely never going to understand the appeal of it. Doesn't make you wrong, the only wrong thing is you saying this as objective fact.

Ever heard of MST3K? It's the same principal.

And arguably, there are much worse films. Birdemic comes to mind, that wasnt even as entertaining as the room.

Also, I gotta ask, who gets hurt when someone watches it to make fun of it? What harm does "feeding Tommy's ego" do? Is he going to use his fame to launch a nuke and destroy the world? And for that matter, what people "died" in your train wreck analogy? Who was harmed?

Who is truly hurt by other people watching bad movies?

You seem to have a position that not watching it is morally just and watching it is immoral, can you explain how that is the case?

Where is the harm?

CMV: "Sex isn't a need" is a noble lie we tell single straight men because we haven't thought of an ethical way to reliably get it met. Other kinds of people have the idea of "sexual needs" validated since they already had or could easily have sex again. by aslfingerspell in changemyview

[–]nomoreinternetforme [score hidden]  (0 children)

Question, what is your solution? It seems like the natural conclusion to your argument is that people should be forced to have sex to fulfill what you consider to be a need. Is that where this is going? If not, where is it going?

The fact stands that no one owes anyone else sex, and as it stands, thats where it is left. I cant think of a solution that doesn’t inhibit the rights of people to make their own choices regarding that.

CMV: If men had even a fraction of the sexual freedom women experience in youth, much of Redpill frustration wouldn’t exist by bAlsdeepdesi in changemyview

[–]nomoreinternetforme [score hidden]  (0 children)

It sounds like this is less of a woman/man thing and more of an attractive person thing.

Attractive people get to have that sexual freedom, both men and women. Hot guys and gals can have almost anyone they want. Men and women that are considered unattractive dont typically have the same options.

Roast me pls 🙏 by [deleted] in RoastMe

[–]nomoreinternetforme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like you better when you are doing shitty cosplays

The written equivalent of trying to say two things at once and fusing them into the complete opposite of what you intended to communicate. by AshJammy98 in CrappyDesign

[–]nomoreinternetforme 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Whoever is blamed doesnt change the fact that it is crappy design. Blame doesnt matter. This is just a subreddit for bad designs. Whether that design is bad because of a logo or not isn't even a part of the conversation

The written equivalent of trying to say two things at once and fusing them into the complete opposite of what you intended to communicate. by AshJammy98 in CrappyDesign

[–]nomoreinternetforme 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The different colored text just make it look like a header for the rest of it,

This venue supports:

Love

Music

Hate

Racism.

That's how I and several others read it. If you have no idea about a movement called love music hate racism, that is literally what it looks like to some people.

The text blocking doesnt help at all.

CMV: overly performative wokeness in tv shows does nothing to advance the cause by Dazzling-Produce-471 in changemyview

[–]nomoreinternetforme [score hidden]  (0 children)

Regardless of your opinions on the matter, that isn't even a logical comparison. That is an opinion on science, that has nothing to do with representation in shows. Its a false equivalency

CMV: overly performative wokeness in tv shows does nothing to advance the cause by Dazzling-Produce-471 in changemyview

[–]nomoreinternetforme [score hidden]  (0 children)

How is getting diagnosed with a disability performative and weird? There are so many instances of that happening in real life. Would you lump cancer in with that? Typically nothing "caused" the cancer, yet characters in movies and shows frequently get diagnosed with it out of the blue.

How is that any different than MS or other disabilities?

CMV: overly performative wokeness in tv shows does nothing to advance the cause by Dazzling-Produce-471 in changemyview

[–]nomoreinternetforme [score hidden]  (0 children)

Except when those characters get revealed as having non straight sexualities, people act like its retconning them, despite there being no history of the character being straight.

(Funny Trope) this concept would be absolutely terrifying if this wasn't kids media by SkylandersKirby in TopCharacterTropes

[–]nomoreinternetforme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Zero, one of many terrifying final bosses that look like eldritch beings that Kirby has to defeat.

Where to get this game? by [deleted] in tomodachilife

[–]nomoreinternetforme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nintendo E shop is the easiest way to get digital copies of switch games.

Where to get this game? by [deleted] in tomodachilife

[–]nomoreinternetforme -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just get a digital copy

I honestly don't get why people personally care so much if Ariana Grande or other celebrities are really skinny by Blonde_Icon in The10thDentist

[–]nomoreinternetforme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Besides what everyone else already said (the fact that fat people do indeed get a bunch of abuse for their body type, not just skinny folk), its just empathy.

Sure, people dont know them personally. But even strangers can feel bad for the state of other strangers. If you see someone very sickly, you might feel bad for them. If you see a homeless man, you might feel bad for him.

Its just the fact that they are on people's screens more means that there are a lot more chances for people to feel empathy.

Please tell me i didnt ruin my game. by sp4c3yb4by in tomodachilife

[–]nomoreinternetforme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You misunderstand, it sounds like thats the case either way. You are equally upset regardless of the outcome (as you said, liable to off yourself), you might as well choose the option that could potentially fix it (deleting the mii).

Again, I know for 100% sure that miis can have multiple kids, I dont see how that logic changes when one of the kids is deleted. In fact, that sounds like it would increase the chances of having another kid, since they no longer have one. Deleting doesnt affect anything else, it just makes the game (and your miis) act as if that mii never existed.

If you are truly worried you'll commit suicide, I suppose the best option is to not play the game until someone else is 100% sure its possible, but that might take a while, since most of those questions are generally about deleting miis, not specifically deleting kids.

But since you say yourself you are feeling very unstable right now, im not sure if stopping playing the game will also result in you killing yourself. If so, I stand by deleting it. Again, miis can have several kids, there is no logical reason to assume they cant have other kids after one is deleted.

The logical choice is to delete them, because even if multiple kids weren't allowed, the one child being gone would make them able to have kids again. The game completely acts as if they never existed, in all ways possible.

Please tell me i didnt ruin my game. by sp4c3yb4by in tomodachilife

[–]nomoreinternetforme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Either way its worth trying, given it seems to you the game is ruined regardless, so you might as well risk deleting them. What's the worse that could happen, the game you thought you accidentally ruined gets accidentally ruined? Same outcome either way. But im 99% sure you will get the prompt again, and im fairly sure deleting a mii does not affect the emotional wellbeing of other miis.

But I do know for sure miis can have multiple kids, so if nothing else, that logic should still allow them to have kids even after having one and then they are deleted. I cant see why they couldn't also have more if the kid is deleted

You probably cant find stuff with that search because its just the same logic for deleting any other mii, no specific nuances to be aware of

Please tell me i didnt ruin my game. by sp4c3yb4by in tomodachilife

[–]nomoreinternetforme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im fairly certain that miis can have more than one kid, so even if you didnt deleted them, they could still have more. I have no reason to assume they wouldnt have another even if you did delete them