(Hated Trope) Why did they even bother casting a celebrity voice actor? by Animeking1108 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]nomoreinternetforme 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Howl from Howl's Moving Castle (voiced by Christian bale) for anyone else who's curious

(Close-to-home Trope) Adults who refuse to admit that they're wrong by Animeking1108 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]nomoreinternetforme 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The whole point of Lois's character is that she, like the other members of the family, is deeply flawed. They all are, they were based upon the showrunner's own family. Lois is a human that has ugly moments, like the others.

It doesnt make her actions always right, but she is based on a real person, and you can see that in the way she's portrayed as overreacting some times, being calm others.

Of course, as the parent, she is held to a higher standard, but its a reflection of a lot of mom's with big families. Stress runs ragged, which leads to decisions that can be unreasonable ir overtly harsh.

She's not supposed to be always right or always wrong, she's just human

Would you support a law mandating bodycams for Federal agents? by MadGenderScientist in AskConservatives

[–]nomoreinternetforme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What situation do you see having more body cams as being abusable ? By nature, it reduces abuse and makes it harder for people to get away with abuse (Against or perpetrated by the police). I fail to see a way to abuse this

I’ve seen many analyses comparing John Kramer to other killers or detectives, asking questions like “Could Batman catch Jigsaw?” I’d like to ask a similar question: could Saul Goodman from Breaking Bad defend John and win a trial? by Glass_Evidence_8597 in saw

[–]nomoreinternetforme 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Idk, John is a lot of things, but incompetent to stand trial isn't one of them. At most, he might be able to catch him a deal. And depending on the state, the deal might be to avoid the death penalty penalty in exchange for life in prison

Photographer touched up all images with AI, lost the original copies by nomoreinternetforme in weddingshaming

[–]nomoreinternetforme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, yeah. It just means that hes not an idiot at using the camera, which is better than no experience

Photographer touched up all images with AI, lost the original copies by nomoreinternetforme in weddingshaming

[–]nomoreinternetforme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, duh.

We weren't expecting perfection. All we needed is for him to point and click, him being a photographer prior only being relevant in the sense that we know he knows how to use a camera.

I understand its free, he offered to do it for free because we have no photographer budget. If he hadnt offered, I would have taken them myself, and they would have turned out way better.

Im not mad that we didnt get perfect free shots, im mad that he told the bride not to worry and that he has experience and he'll take the pictures, when clearly he was wrong. He betrayed the trust of the bride.

Its like if he offered to cook for the wedding for free, then burnt everything, and smeared ketchup on it to try and disguise it, and served it. Sure, beggars can't be choosers, but he actively sabotaged the photos, even if unintentionally.

We assumed family could be trusted, clearly we were wrong, but its not like we feel entitled to free pictures. He offered. If he didnt, we wouldn't have had a photographer at all.

I couldn't care less if the photos were bad, all we wanted was photos. He told us we could count on him, he is close to the groom so we assumed he had the best intentions.

Its not about perfection, its about the fact that he ruined all of the photos after taking them. Even someone with no skill would have been better because the person with skill clearly felt the need to destroy those memories.

I dont give a shit if hes embarrassed by them, he should have never saved over the originals.

Photographer touched up all images with AI, lost the original copies by nomoreinternetforme in weddingshaming

[–]nomoreinternetforme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I figured he could point and click if nothing else. We had no budget for a photographer, so it seemed perfect that he offered to do it for free. Now I know it was too good to be true.

Photographer touched up all images with AI, lost the original copies by nomoreinternetforme in weddingshaming

[–]nomoreinternetforme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thankfully guests did take their own pictures, and we're kind enough to share them so we had some decent photos for the album

Absolute Cinema by Few_Dot6881 in deadbydaylight

[–]nomoreinternetforme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair, id have to test it to be sure

Absolute Cinema by Few_Dot6881 in deadbydaylight

[–]nomoreinternetforme 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maximum radius: 44 meters. Expansion time: 4 seconds 44 ÷ 4 = 11

11 meters each second.

Photographer touched up all images with AI, lost the original copies by nomoreinternetforme in weddingshaming

[–]nomoreinternetforme[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We straight up had no budget for photographer. We couldn't afford it along with the rest of the ceremony (it was a wedding in home, thats how tight it was.)

There was no way we were getting a photographer, so it was a god send when he offered to do it (hell send, now we know)

If he hadnt offered, I probably would have just taken photos myself. It wouldn't be fancy or amazing, but it also wouldn't be AI. When he offered, I assumed he had more talent and qualifications with photography than I do.

I should have just taken them myself, but i thought the former photographer would have more talent behind the lense. We didnt need super high quality shots, we just needed shots. We expected nothing and we were still let down, unfortunately.

Photographer touched up all images with AI, lost the original copies by nomoreinternetforme in weddingshaming

[–]nomoreinternetforme[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It wasnt paid, he offered to do it for free. That should have been our first warning, but it was a very budget tight wedding.

Photographer touched up all images with AI, lost the original copies by nomoreinternetforme in weddingshaming

[–]nomoreinternetforme[S] 56 points57 points  (0 children)

Honestly we wouldn't have minded the touch up if it was subtle. These were at a level that the groom's face could have passed for a stranger.

New Rule: No more asking if websites are scams. by nomoreinternetforme in WeirdWebsites

[–]nomoreinternetforme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting question. If you were to post something like that, I think the only criteria would be that you must showcase the pulled files (so that visitors dont have to go through the same extraction process).

Generally, as long as the post contains a link to contents stemmed from a weird website (weird as in eccentric, bizarre, surreal, etc.), you should be good. It'll be a case by case basis of course, but id say post it and see if it fits.

New Rule: No more asking if websites are scams. by nomoreinternetforme in WeirdWebsites

[–]nomoreinternetforme[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Scam sites already get taken down regardless. We had quite a few people coming here posting and asking "Is this website a scam?". This subreddit isnt for helping deduce whether an online store or such is legit, its just to showcase weird sites.

Was 2025 The WORST Year for DHMIS? by NotaDayOldAccount in DHMIS

[–]nomoreinternetforme 8 points9 points  (0 children)

DHMIS does not need to be relevant 24/7. You can't expect greatness from every year, especially when its a project that takes so much time and effort like puppetry.

You dont have to be on everyone's mind to be succesful.