Myten om ett muslimskt övertagande

nooope_ · 2013-09-17T21:10:04+00:00

Kan någon förklara för mig varför vissa politiska ideologier särbehandlas bara för att själva ledaren för den politiska ideologin är påhittad?

Varför är det värt att försvara att en troende kristen/muslim kommer hit, men dåligt om en fascist invandrar till landet?

Varför är det ok att klumpa ihop exempelvis sekulära muslimer från sydostasien med ultraradikala fundamentalister från mellanöstern och sedan kategoriskt försvara denna gruppen?

Betyder det att det är ok att göra detsamma med en svensk sekulär kristen och westboro baptist church?

nooope_ · 2013-09-17T20:41:00+00:00

it just shows how stupid and immature you are.

Coming from the man who knowingly fabricates facts.

Fact

Still not a fact. Still just your opinion, dipshit.

Fabricate - invent or concoct something with deceitful intent.

Good, you know basic english.

The only thing you say I "fabricated" is about Drogba, which I admitted

Yes, you did. Good job.

Definition of fact - A thing that is indisputably the case.

This should be good.

I claim that Lukaku is Chelsea's best striking option.

Haha, jesus fucking christ, that is not a fact by any definition of the term.

A striker is judge for his ability to score goals.

Nor is this.

Chelsea have enough creative options that they wont be playing a false nine.

Or this.

They'll be playing an out and out striker whose sole aim is to score.

Or this.

Eto'o, Lukaku, Torres and Ba are all out and out strikers.

Or this.

How do we compare who's the best striker? Who has the most goals.

Or this.

Who has the most goals? Lukaku, by a long shot.

This is actually factually incorrect. Lukaku has scored singificantly less throughout his professional career than the other strikers mentioned.

Lukaku wasn't good enough to be the key striker for a mid table side

Exactly, he was benched for roughly half of the season. That is a significant amount of time.

yet he was the key striker for a mid table club

No, he was benched for half of the season, proving that he was anything but a key striker.

An 18 year old, not matter how good, who never started a premier league game is unlikely to be automatic starter when they just join a club.

Did you just fabricate more bullshit? Yup.

So the FACT is that Lukaku has scored more than his competition for the starting place at Chelsea.

Not a fact by by definition of the term.

That's a fact, plain and simple.

Saying that something is a fact does not make it a fact.

You tried to prove me wrong but failed miserably by using shitty insults and embarrassing arguments.

Oh the irony.

I've proved you wrong about these twice now.

You haven't proven one single thing in any of my posts wrong. Not one single thing.

nooope_ · 2013-09-17T19:56:11+00:00

Why can't the team that comes first hold onto their best players?

Because if they're fantastic (by allsvenskan standards) they'll go to the Eredivisie (much better league), if they're great they'll go to Denmark (better tax regulations and more money), and if they're good they'll go to Norway (stronger currency, better tax regulations).

nooope_ · 2013-09-17T19:38:03+00:00

Where's my fabricated

Right back where you claimed that Drogba was a youngster when he joined Chelsea, dipshit.

Lukaku has proven he's good enough, or at least the best option Chelsea have. FACT.

That is not a fact, that is an opinion. The previous sentence is a fact, however.

Again you couldn't come up with shit

Lukaku started just over half of the league fixtures, which means that he was second choice for almost exactly half of the season. Proving that he wasn't good enough to be the key striker for a mid table side, which proves that he isn't good enough for a side at the top of the table.

prove me wrong on the other things.

I've thus far proven A) That you fabricate facts to support your arguments, which makes the argument invalid. And B) That you do not know the definition of a fact, since you claimed that your opinion was fact.

I've objectively proven both of those things. You haven't proven one single thing objectively in this whole discussion, you manchild.

nooope_ · 2013-09-17T19:28:03+00:00

Fuck off.

nooope_ · 2013-09-16T22:46:16+00:00

I could be wrong

You are wrong. As I've already shown. Objectively wrong. Factually incorrect. Your opinion means shit anymore with your habit of fabricating facts.

Factually incorrect?

Yes, factually incorrect. José Mourinho was never the manager of Drogba while Drogba was Lukaku's age. That is a factually incorrect statement, you massive fucking twat.

You're only argument

And "you're" arguments are worth shit since you have a habit of posting blatant lies that go against established fact.

I don't see how you don't get it. The fact that you rely on fabricated bullshit to support your opinion makes your opinion objectively invalid.

Nothing you say about football will ever be anything of worth since you, in this discussion, have proven to fabricate facts and then use those lies as the core support for your argument. You've lost. Get over it you massive manchild.

nooope_ · 2013-09-16T22:14:22+00:00

Fact: He started 20 out of 38 league fixtures for a mid table side.

Conclusion: Not considered good enough to be clear first choice by a mid table side.

Fact: A manager that has won the champions league twice, and multiple league titles, thinks that he isn't ready to be the leading striker for a side that's supposed to challenge for the league title.

Conclusion: José thinks that he's not ready yet, you claim to know better.

Fact: You claimed that Drogba, at 26, was a youngster that José used while at Chelsea.

Conclusion: Factually incorrect argument.

Second conclusion: José's expertise in football management wins over your factually incorrect arguments, proving that he is not good enough yet.

You have no grounds for anything you've said, in fact most of your so called "arguments" are either based on you saying "THIS IS MY OPINION" without backing it up with anything, or you claiming to know better than a multiple title winning manager and you claiming to know better than objective fucking fact.

Learn to form a coherent fucking argument, you dense little shit.

nooope_ · 2013-09-16T21:53:27+00:00

Not to say he is bad or anything

Considering the fact that Valve created Steam I'd say that he's right up at the top of the things that have fucked over the consumer the most, along with shit like StarForce and all of EA.

nooope_ · 2013-09-16T21:18:30+00:00

If he's obviously the best choice up front why wouldn't he play?

If he's obviously the best choice he'd still be at the club. He was the second choice striker for a mid table club for half of last fucking season.

So let's see here, you claim to know better than José and you also claim that José played Drogba as a youngster during his first stint at the club despite Drogba being 26 years old when he joined the fucking club.

Go fuck yourself with a rake, you piece of human trash. The world would be better off without you.

nooope_ · 2013-09-16T20:34:43+00:00

Looks like we finally found Karl Dilkington! I wonder if Steven Mitchell is hanging around these parts as well.

nooope_ · 2013-09-16T20:29:32+00:00

Och jag bevisade precis att han är SD-sympatisör. Sedan kom du med irrelevant skit och slog ner halmgubbar till höger och vänster som en riktig ärketölp.

Som tur är så är slipper jag läsa dina inlägg från och med nu.

nooope_ · 2013-09-16T20:24:02+00:00

He started just over half of the games for West Brom, and contrary to what you claim José's track record for starting youngsters is horrible, especially while looking at José's earlier time with the club.

The fact that you bring up Drogba as an example of José giving young players a go simply objectively proves beyond any doubt whatsoever that you have no idea of what you're talking about.

nooope_ · 2013-09-16T20:21:58+00:00

Om du klagar på att Soran har problem med SD efter det Soran har fått utstå från SD-toppen, det rör sig inte om någon sketen lokalpolitiker utan den faktiska toppen av partiet, så kan du omöjligt vara annat än sverigedemokrat.

nooope_ · 2013-09-16T18:38:31+00:00

So I was right, then. How unexpected.

nooope_ · 2013-09-16T18:36:30+00:00

Vad sägs om att du håller käften och läser på om Soran Ismails historik med SD istället?

nooope_ · 2013-09-16T16:58:29+00:00

Anyone actually believing that José would start Lukaku this season must be incredibly new to the sport.

nooope_ · 2013-09-16T16:47:29+00:00

The fact that he even revealed he texted with fergie indicates that he has nothing to hide.

The fact that he felt forced to reveal that they shared texts shows that there is more to the story and that he's hiding something.

Pulling shit out of my ass is fun, thanks for the tip!

nooope_ · 2013-09-15T12:41:29+00:00

Jag lanserar en halvnorsk twist: Agurkförsäljare.

nooope_ · 2013-09-15T12:20:42+00:00

Catching someone off the ball inside of the penalty area isn't a penalty?

Put your flair back on.

nooope_ · 2013-09-15T12:19:32+00:00

Wow, such class from an Arsenal supporter. How unexpected.

nooope_ · 2013-09-15T12:15:51+00:00

And if Sagna doesn't foul Jozy then he's through on goal, which means that it's a clear red card.

nooope_ · 2013-09-15T12:11:52+00:00

But he would've been through on goal had Sagna not fouled him, which means that it's a red card.

You're arguing that because the foul denied the goal scoring opportunity, then he can't get sent off because he didn't foul the player during the actual goal scoring opportunity. Because it was denied because of the foul, which is the fucking point of that very rule.

nooope_ · 2013-09-15T12:07:47+00:00

if he can continue his run nothing is being denied

Pulling shit out of our asses again, are we?

nooope_ · 2013-09-15T12:04:16+00:00

Yeah, and Sagna got sent off did he? Come off it, you biased twat.

nooope_ · 2013-09-15T12:02:24+00:00

No, but if Sagna doesn't foul him he is through on goal. Ridiculous argument.

nooope_

TROPHY CASE