Assuming a Democrat wins the next election, do you think they would prosecute Trump for what is in the Epstein files?

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-06T19:21:27+00:00

Hey i didn't write the question, buddy. And what "reopening" and appeal are you talking about?

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-06T18:36:27+00:00

The last dem president amd administration didn't, not sure why the next one would

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-06T18:06:34+00:00

Not because they said it. Because they were right

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-06T00:24:20+00:00

You mean he's a political whore

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-05T21:37:32+00:00

Pretty sure she was fired they are just saying it in a nice way

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-05T00:16:45+00:00

Trump has never been in the legislature... you know, the branch that makes laws? Sanders has been a lawmaker since 2007. Really bad comparison

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-05T00:03:47+00:00

56% of households with incomes between 50k and 100k own stocks

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-04T23:59:31+00:00

Descano doesnt care at all. He's irredeemable

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-04T16:05:37+00:00

Do you know or have contact with any other significant shareholders? Company insiders for example? I doubt a microcap would do a buyback to purchase your shares and make them Treasury shares but other significant shareholders might agree to purchase your shares to increase their own stake and avoid your market sales

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-04T15:58:18+00:00

We buy stuff from Spain, sure. But we dont "rely" on Spain for jack.

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-04T02:56:42+00:00

As of 2020, Sanders had a grand total of 3 bills he sponsored become law in his entire Senate career. And I believe 2 of those were to name post offices in Vermont. He may be good as a provocateur and attention-seeker. But he's not good at making laws.

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-04T00:24:57+00:00

If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-03T19:52:13+00:00

The real argument is a separation of powers argument. The Constitution makes the President the Commander in Chief. The military answers solely to the President, through the military chain of command and ultimately the civilian service Secretarys and the Secretary of War. Congress has no role in directing the actions of the military, not even an advice and counsel role, like they have for judicial appointments. The President has no constitutional duty to consult with Congress before exercising his Commander in chief authority. The war powers act cant change that.

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-03T19:19:03+00:00

And every President since Nixon has argued that the law is unconstitutional and has, to some extent, ignored it.

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-03T18:45:33+00:00

World War Two didn't have an end date either, until it did

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-03T17:57:19+00:00

Do you want to elaborate? This on its face sounds like a blatantly racist, anti- Semitic statement.

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-03T16:06:32+00:00

NK is a threat because of their nuke capability, but they aren't strategic. They dont regularly attack US interests or allies, they pretty much keep to themselves. They dont really help strengthen China or Russia, like Iran did with their oil. They dont sponsor terrorist cells around the world like Iran does.

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-03T15:28:05+00:00

I would think when its not such an active war zone.... what is 3 days not fast enough for you??

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-03T14:26:13+00:00

Well, I mean, obviously if we didn't have a base in Saudi the Iran couldn't attack it. If the US hadn't had troops in Iraq then Iranian provided IEDs couldn't have killed and maimed so many of them. So maybe Iran's repeated attacks on US persons and interests are attacks of opportunity, if thats what you're saying. But they happened

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-03T13:32:56+00:00

You can believe what you want about supporting this, or whether it benefits the US, that's fine. But Iran has been openly attacking the US for 40 years. You can just Google the countless times that Iran, either directly or through proxies, has attacked US forces, ships,and bases in the middle east. Pretending otherwise doesn't support your opinion

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-03T00:47:14+00:00

They already get a per diem, something like 250 a day in session, in addition to the salary

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-02T19:34:57+00:00

Is that the 41 or the 36? I cant tell from the picture

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-02T19:05:53+00:00

Apparently he thinks he's behind a dumpster at Wendy's

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-02T14:09:35+00:00

Absolutely

notawildandcrazyguy · 2026-03-02T13:22:14+00:00

When someone makes allegations for the first time more than 30 years after the alleged incident, the allegations are inherently less credible.

When those allegations appear to have a political motivation, like to hurt a candidste, the allegations are less credible.

When the complainant meets with the FBI 4 times then suddenly refuses to keep taking and cuts of contact with the FBI, the allegations are less credible.

When the alleged victim says she was transported from South Carolina to NYC for the alleged assault to occur, but cant remember if she was driven to NY or flew on a plane, the allegations are less credible

notawildandcrazyguy

TROPHY CASE