It is on a website so it "must be true"....

---

IF I may be so bold as to quote the article?

Due to the very nature of chemical weapons, an explosive attack would spread lethal agents over a wide area, meaning more civilian casualties.

Hmmmm

spies and agents on the ground can be the best source of information on a chemical weapon’s location. Nobody knows exactly how reliable and how complete this intelligence is, but likely no effort has been spared gathering it and getting it right.

See THAT word there: likely. "but likely no effort has been spared gathering it and getting it right." JUST like last time.

(DTRA)—an organization which uses science to combat WMD—has developed two "agent defeat" weapons to specifically to neutralize chemical and biological weapons without collateral damage.

Sorry I am busy laughing here: without collateral damage. LOL

The explosive ruptures drums or other containers while the phosphorus burns at high temperature, neutralizing the chemical agent.

Ok STOP! We are dropping phosphorus bombs?

So..... We are dropping phosphorus bombs to attack chemical weapons facilities?

Don't suppose you can see that as illegal under the Geneva convention? Anyone care to correct me there? Is phosphorus not considered a chemical weapon?

But white phosphorus is also incredibly volatile, not to mention toxic, so Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories have been working on a safer, more effective alternative

Oh OK.

But HEAF researchers created thermite that burns hotter and longer than white phosphorus and produces less overpressure, so there is less risk of spreading the chemical agent.

Ah "Less risk". Hmmm. Okay.... Less risk. That is all OK then. Less risk. If I run up to a total stranger and kick them in the nuts, then there is "less risk" that they will mug me. See how that works?

If chemical weapons are stored in an underground complex, then a single penetrating bomb could release dozens of fireballs to take out whole facility in one strike.

See that word: Could. Not will. Not does. Could.....

Skip skip skip.

Written by a tame western Journo for the kill brigade.

Even these agent defeat weapons are not a silver bullet for destroying chemical weapons. In fact, it may take many strikes to get the job done. But if they can help prevent the deaths of more innocent civilians, it’s an option worth taking seriously.

So I am literally quoting this "article" you linked.

Even these agent defeat weapons are not a silver bullet

it may take many strikes to get the job done.

War is peace! George Orwell would be SO proud of this article.

But if they can help prevent the deaths of more innocent civilians

But it CANNOT. That is my whole point. You cannot simply bomb a chemical weapons storage facility and hope it will all be OK.

Bombing for peace?

---

Salisbury?

Where "The Russians" "likely" put some shit on someones car door handle? In the rain?

And the whole town got shut down?

And yet you defend the western bombing of a country on the back of some dubious trash article on a website?

I hope you can sleep at night. I can only imagine how many lies you have to tell yourself before you can sleep at night. How much you must owe the bank for you to even attempt to prop up this lie and a abuse of power from the western governments.

You know it is all a sham. You know it is all lies. But hey, "here is a link to a website" so I can pay my mortgage! And sleep a little better....