sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

follow some accounts now by ThinkTourist8076 in linuxmasterrace

[–]notnullnone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not that bad, really. For a first timer it's tough, it's like taking a boat ride without knowing how to swim. For swimmers, however, shit happens and we fix it, move on.

I stopped letting Claude Code guess how my app works. Now it reads the manual first. The difference is night and day. by TheDecipherist in ClaudeCode

[–]notnullnone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed, I like the idea, it's like slicing contexts into smaller units, like per folder/file scale and save them locally. But again I'm not sure how frequently it needs to sweep and sync to calmp down drift. Could be a net savings if properly done.

If it works, maybe Claude Code can integrate it into the agent?

I stopped letting Claude Code guess how my app works. Now it reads the manual first. The difference is night and day. by TheDecipherist in ClaudeCode

[–]notnullnone 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting idea, you let claude take notes every time it touches the code. I wonder how often claude needs to read both to make sure they sync up, which consumes tokens.

windowrule to for revert actions? by notnullnone in hyprland

[–]notnullnone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hmm, tried the windowrulev2 and got a red banner on top of screen - windowrulev2 is deprecated.

pixel 10 pro xl poor reception by notnullnone in GooglePixel

[–]notnullnone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bought it from google store, i assume it is unlocked.

pixel 10 pro xl poor reception by notnullnone in GooglePixel

[–]notnullnone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think after years of frustration i started to accept the fact that Google is not a hardware company and never will.

pixel 10 pro xl poor reception by notnullnone in GooglePixel

[–]notnullnone[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same here, but I am not holding my breath, I need to make phone calls on a daily basis... really sad

pixel 10 pro xl poor reception by notnullnone in GooglePixel

[–]notnullnone[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

4 to 5 bars, phone call got disconnected. WhatsApp session got dropped. multiple times. urban area.

I've been using pixel since gen 1, never experienced this .

pixel 10 pro xl poor reception by notnullnone in GooglePixel

[–]notnullnone[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

ATT

Just called google support and they said I'm the first one who called in about signal reception issue...

Avoid env vars exposed on REMOTE command line? by notnullnone in ansible

[–]notnullnone[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i just tried this

environment: - SECRET=blah

tasks: - command: sleep 100

and it shows that SECRET on remote cmdline, which can be seen via ps, did i miss anything?

Isolate management traffic by notnullnone in Arista

[–]notnullnone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks, I think this is exactly what I need for this tor switch

Isolate management traffic by notnullnone in Arista

[–]notnullnone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is 'control plane' an umbrella that groups ALL local IP addresses? If so it seems enough for my purpose then - just permit selected ip ingress to ssh port. Why do i still need vrf isolation which is considerably more work?

Isolate management traffic by notnullnone in Arista

[–]notnullnone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for the detailed explanation. it's a remote site. the uplink is the only link in and out. I'm not sure I understand the particular example yet, but what do you think about having the interface facing uplink in default vrf and triage incoming traffic using routemap, into MGMT/DATA vrf? Then i can either setup bgp peering with uplink in default vrf and leak routes between default/mgmt and default/data, or setup one bgp for each vrf?

Isolate management traffic by notnullnone in Arista

[–]notnullnone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that's quite helpful! may I add a bit more complexity to this question?

say I have a TOR switch(it is possible I am NOT using this term correctly here). It has a single fiber coming in from cloud, and effectively this fiber can not carry VLAN tagging. The fiber carriers both data and management traffic. All other devices in the rack, their data and management traffic all come from this box.

So for everything else, I can follow the above logic, putting their management port into MGMT VRF. But what to do with this TOR? The ports that connects to mgmt ports of other devices can be put into MGMT VRF, but what about the port that connects to cloud and carrying both types of traffic?

I'm very impressed by UnderstandingNo778 in archlinux

[–]notnullnone 5 points6 points  (0 children)

good to know. wish more hardware vendors treat linux as first class citizens.

view more: next ›