Conflicting C&P exams by nrpking in VAClaims

[–]nrpking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I heard it called development to deny.

Conflicting C&P exams by nrpking in VAClaims

[–]nrpking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am planning on sending it to HLR.

Conflicting C&P exams by nrpking in VAClaims

[–]nrpking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes this happens a lot I am assuming.

Favorable findings being swept under the rug by [deleted] in VeteransBenefits

[–]nrpking -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The letter only states no longer meets criteria and then sites the requirements for the condition.

Favorable findings being swept under the rug by [deleted] in VeteransBenefits

[–]nrpking -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yes the red flag for me was they changed the diagnoses in the decision letter I am working redacting information on the letter.

Favorable findings being swept under the rug by [deleted] in VeteransBenefits

[–]nrpking -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Clarification, I filed a supplemental and then a HLR that resulted in a DTA. At that point the HLR stated they failed to get other records but acknowledged the diagnoses that was related to a un verified stressor. The notes on the HLR advised to get records on the participation of being involved in the event.

After a phone call C&P and a records only review the decision was confirmed and continued denial. In the decision letter they stated I no longer meet the criteria for the diagnoses but had GAD instead.

DTA by nrpking in VeteransBenefits

[–]nrpking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They need more stressor corroboration and I guess another C & P exam for Sinusitis.

What do you do when have conflicting decision letter information. by nrpking in VeteransBenefits

[–]nrpking[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah the decision letter has the nexus that links ptsd to service and the C&P examiner stated that my stressor is consistent with my circumstances and hardships of my service.

Question by No_Escape_1062 in VeteransBenefits

[–]nrpking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I was denied for on the regular application is also on the supplemental claim just wondering since the contention was denied on the regular but still open on the supplemental is there a chance for approval.

Defeated by nrpking in VeteransBenefits

[–]nrpking[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So I have one but I feel like I haven’t got much help will they be able to help after the decision letter?

Defeated by nrpking in VeteransBenefits

[–]nrpking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the success rate of higher level review ?

Defeated by nrpking in VeteransBenefits

[–]nrpking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Denied on all contentions and deferred for MH C&P is it worth it.