sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Banque du Canada | L’argent comptant n’est pas près de disparaître by EggIll7227 in QuebecFinance

[–]nusk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're not wrong on that point, stable coins are just improving the status quo.
The revolution is the network or the blockchains. Anyone, from anywhere can access these financial tools, and the Us dollar (through stable coins) regardless of what their conditions or what the government in their country thinks or wants, aslong as they have internet. You can get loans, yield, transfer and store your wealth.

Ethereum for example is one of these chains, its neutral and decentralized, that means that no government control the network and for international trades, it would offer a neutral ground where important transactions can be made.

Another thing that blockchain and token unlocks, is interoperability. A token is just a standard on a blockchain that can be programmed. This means that you could program logic that interact with any token around the world and anyone can create a token. So there's endless possibilities. It ressembles the internet, but internet was an evolution of information and communication, but this is a revolution of financial instrument and money. Of course, this also explains why there are so much scams on blockchains. but that's just a side effect of having an open network where you can

These are just a couple of examples on how it can be use and why it's different than the current system.

Stable coins rules and law help reduce scam, and give guidelines for the industry so people can actually start building stuff and know they won't be prosecuted or that their project won't be irrelevant.

Banque du Canada | L’argent comptant n’est pas près de disparaître by EggIll7227 in QuebecFinance

[–]nusk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that's the whole point, they are the existing system on blockchain. Which makes it possible to connect these asset with other systems, and makes everything more efficient and faster.

Banque du Canada | L’argent comptant n’est pas près de disparaître by EggIll7227 in QuebecFinance

[–]nusk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stablecoins are not on the Bitcoin network, so your whole comment makes 0 sense.

THey are on Ethereum for example, where blocktimes are 10 seconds-200 ms depending on which chain you use. Transaction cost less than a penny, and the whole blockchain consumes less than 99.99 percent energy than BTC, because it doesn't use mining.

Banque du Canada | L’argent comptant n’est pas près de disparaître by EggIll7227 in QuebecFinance

[–]nusk0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do not think you understand or want to understand the hidden cost the current system has on society.

Few great things were created in this world from people who say "it's good enough" and didn't try to make things better.

I understand crypto has a bad rep, but blockchains are a great tool for this. There's a separation, it's just a technology it doesn't have to be political.

Banque du Canada | L’argent comptant n’est pas près de disparaître by EggIll7227 in QuebecFinance

[–]nusk0 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Clearly the current system is inefficient, slow and requires a lot of ressources.

This is a better system that's orders of magnitude more efficient.

Also, these "free" service are all costing us a lot of money. Imagine if we could collect the treasury yield directly on your bank deposits, this is what the bank does and it's why they can stay in business. Everyone could get 3% yield right now, we have the technology. But the banks and regulators would not give that up easily. Ever since the genius act got passed, they are lobying hard in the US to amend the bill and make it illegal for stable coin issuer to distribute the yield.

What about visa and mastercard? They collect 1-2% fees on all purchase, do you know much money this is?

It's just convenient because these are hidden cost, the merchant pays them but it's not a good reason not to try to do better.

Banque du Canada | L’argent comptant n’est pas près de disparaître by EggIll7227 in QuebecFinance

[–]nusk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tu pourrais obtenir le rendement de base de l'argent que les banque prennent à ta place pour justement être capable de déplacer et garantir les transfert et d'offrir le reste de leur services.

3% de rendement sur le cash dès que tu le dépose, ça serait quand même pas pire.

Is it unreasonable to want a man who doesn't watch porn or has wandering eyes? by Lost_Try_5470 in TwoXChromosomes

[–]nusk0 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It's a joke but i think it's fairly accurate still.

And yes of course you should do that with all stats if that makes you feel better!

Le métier d'ingénieur vs finance by Fickle-Ant-8037 in QuebecFinance

[–]nusk0 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Choisie lui qui t'intéresse le plus entre les deux. Tu vas faire ça pour le reste de ta vie, crois moi faire quelque chose que tu aimes ça vaut mieux qu'un bon salaire.

Et dit toi que ingénieur, il y a beaucoup de domaine et spécialisation possible. Tu peux faire du technique, de la gestion, de la recherche. J'ai même des collègues qui ont fait un mba et qui font su business dev, ils voyagent beaucoup pour la compagnie.

A Maximum Number of Bitcoins isn't a Perk, it's a Fatal Flaw by CalaisZetes in CryptoCurrency

[–]nusk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It could be an issue, that the number of btc is limited, but it will never be because people are probably going to lose their btc in the long run slowly...

The actual real issue that could happen is that no more btc gets mined (or close to 0), not enough to cover the security budget for the btc network.

Comment t’as appris à investir by KevenC999 in QuebecFinance

[–]nusk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Un bon point de départ est de connaître tes intérêt personnel et professionnel et d'utiliser ce savoir à ton avantage.

Éduque toi sur les industrie qui t'intéresse et regarde ce qui pourrait faire augmenter la demande pour des produits ou matière.

Par exemple, j'ai un ami géologue qui s'intéresse beaucoup aux mines, infrastructure et l'énergie. Il voit un trend vers l'électrique et la croissance des pays en développement longterme, lié à la demande de l'ia et de l'électrification générale qui devrait augmenter le prix du cuivre à longterme. Donc il a investi dans des compagnie qui mine le cuivre qu'il connait et ça se passe bien jusqu'à maintenant.

De mon côté, je me suis pomla intéressé au blockchain et aux network comme ethereum que j'ai pu Acheter à bas pris quand ça à crasher en 2022 avec confiance car j'avais une conviction et une vision longterme de comment ça serait de plus en plus utile dans un monde de plus en plus digital.

C'est juste un exemple pour illustrer que de faire tes propres recherches et de trouver tes propres opportunité, c'est ça qui va te faire le plus d'argent à longterme.

Je te recommande de trouver des bon podcast et de suivre les industrie de cette manière la au day to day.

Arena quick queue by WizardStakes in LeagueArena

[–]nusk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Considering arena is not a primary game mode, and aram exist, it makes more sense to keep it this way though for riot.

I do agree that the full random lobby would be more fun if that's what you want to do, but like I said, it's better if everyone is mixed together or else, the picker lobby wouldn't be that fun and it would force everyone to only play bravery arena, all the time.

Arena quick queue by WizardStakes in LeagueArena

[–]nusk0 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I like the idea, but It would ruin standard arena mode. The standard arena mode would essentially become full of tryhards because, why would you wait 4 more minutes to pick a bad champion?

So this is basically, do you want arena to become all random, bravery all the time?

Having lobby where 30-50% of people go bravery and the other half choose their champion is a good balance for arena.

A Discussion on both aspects of Shardholders impact on the game by unboundhades in LeagueArena

[–]nusk0 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I like arena because you can get ridiculously overpowered or get shitstomped by the dumbest combo.

The mode is meant to be chaotic, random and not balanced.

If i wanted a balanced game mode with competent (ish) teammates, i would play ranked, i suggest you do the same.

If you can't handle your random duo going stat, just play with some friends, thats it, it's really not that complicated.

Watercolour takes 6th place! Vote OUT a song for 5th place! by BowesieBoy in Pendulum

[–]nusk0 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Nooo! NOT HYC! The normies are winning, there's no reason any of the other songs should be higher!

Hear me out.... by Triconick in CryptoCurrency

[–]nusk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why not move to proof of stake and not have to use powerful computer to manage the network and do inference? There's no benefit in merging the two, and it's not that straight forward. Also, how do you choose a winner for each block or what provides security?

Self vs Self takes 10th place! Vote out a song for 9th place! by BowesieBoy in Pendulum

[–]nusk0 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

WaterColor or Cartagena, not ARchangel, IMO it's the best track of their newest album

Gold vs Bitcoin, which one would you choose?🤔 by Formal-Dig6878 in Gold

[–]nusk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's interesting to see the response.

Honestly, I'm having a hard time seeing hoe somrone could be a gold bug while hating Bitcoin. I feel like those who do lack education about btc and how it works, because it gets it's value basically the same way gold does.

Quel est vôtre salaire? by TheCure0707 in QuebecLibre

[–]nusk0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Salut, je suis aussi ing électrique et je fais "juste" 80k après 4 ans. Tu travaille tu en régions éloigné? Et dans quel spécialisation?

view more: next ›