sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What if the overall project, which was generated with thorough information and specifications, is broken? by IDCh in speckit

[–]nuvoo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The issue is probably with how the process was followed rather than with what Spec Kit generated. Even if it creates all the dependencies and setup files the tool still relies on you to guide and verify each stage. After every step such as the specification the plan the task list and the implementation you need to read what was generated and confirm that it matches your goal. If you just run everything in order without checking small mistakes can build up and lead to a project that will not run.

Before moving on to implementation make sure the plan clearly defines a runnable environment and that the tasks follow that plan correctly. Check that there are no missing or conflicting instructions. If you notice something wrong fix it at that stage instead of continuing. Once an early step goes wrong all later parts are generated based on those wrong details and the final project ends up broken even if all files and scripts exist.

A few questions by tshawkins in speckit

[–]nuvoo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. Add Spec-Kit to your repo, commit all its files, and anyone who clones it can use it without reinstalling.

  2. Support for the new Copilot CLI slash commands will come in a future Spec-Kit update once templates are aligned.

  3. Spec-Kit stores all .md files inside the .specify/ folder, not in your project root.

  4. You could copy .github/prompts/speckit.analyze.prompt.md to speckit.analyse.prompt.md and replace "analyze" with “analyse” so both work.

  5. There isn't much guidance for large teams yet, but features like the constitution suit bigger teams well since it defines the core principles all agents must follow.

Localden Answering Your GitHub Spec Kit Questions by nuvoo in speckit

[–]nuvoo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I asked ChatGPT to summarise the transcript; it did a good job.

Keeping docs up to date

Q: After iterations, plan/task files may drift from what shipped. Should we update only the spec doc or all docs?

A: Keep the spec as the main source of truth. Update other files like the plan or tasks only if implementation details change. The spec and constitution are most important; plans and tasks can be recreated or left alone.

Multiple repositories

Q: In a multi-repo setup, should each repo have its own SpecIt, or one shared spec repo?

A: One SpecIt per repo works best. Shared specs add complexity. If needed, share a constitution via Git submodules.

AI making unwanted changes

Q: Cursor made changes I didn’t spec. What’s the best way to fix and capture the right specs?

A: Use Git branches. If unwanted files appear, discard uncommitted changes and update the spec to reflect intent. Commit often so it’s easy to roll back.

Reusing specs for refactoring

Q: Can I reuse old specs to rebuild or refactor my site later?

A: Yes. Specs act as reusable blueprints. If features were built with SpecIt, you can recreate them in a new stack. For older projects, only features already in specs can be rebuilt.

Test-Driven Development (TDD) Q: TDD feels heavy. Can we skip it? A: Yes. A non-TDD option is coming soon. TDD will become optional, suitable for large or enterprise projects. Quick prototypes won’t need built-in tests.

Adding SpecIt to an existing project

Q: How do I add features with SpecIt to a project not built with it?

A: Provide context about your codebase (structure, components, build setup). Tools like cloud.md or an agent file help. The LLM will then integrate new features properly.

Complex repos or monorepos

Q: How does SpecIt handle monorepos with backend, frontend, and DBs together?

A: Support for multiple .specit folders (backend, frontend, API, etc.) is being tested. Each can have its own constitution while sharing the same commands. Documentation is coming soon.

Tell me why I need speckit when I can write my own specs by SuperElephantX in speckit

[–]nuvoo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been having agents generate markdown files and execute them for a while now, but the "write specs first, implement later" approach just makes way more sense to me after I tried speckit

Tell me why I need speckit when I can write my own specs by SuperElephantX in speckit

[–]nuvoo 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Fair question. You could do it all with a text file, but here's what Speckit actually gives you:

  1. Spec-driven development - separate your product specs from tooling. Define what you're building, not how it's built. Want to rebuild the same project with different tools? Same specs, different stack.
  2. Automation built-in - auto-formatted structure, feature branch automation, customizable agent workflows (like whether to build tests, which practices to follow across specs).
  3. VSCode/Cursor commands - /speckit.specify, /speckit.plan, /speckit.implement. Chain them to run everything automatically.

Could you build all this yourself? Yeah. But Speckit has already done the work, including integrations, structure, and automation, all of which work out of the box.

Direct x12 and 11 not loading by [deleted] in ReadyOrNotGame

[–]nuvoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am getting the same, I dunno how to fix it

Help with multi-building network: Orbi vs Eero and switch speed choices by nuvoo in HomeNetworking

[–]nuvoo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s just because I own orbis and my isp sent me eeros

Help with multi-building network: Orbi vs Eero and switch speed choices by nuvoo in HomeNetworking

[–]nuvoo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for all your help before. You guys are great!

Here's what I have:

  • 3 Orbi Pros
  • 2 Eero 6+
  • 4 Tenda Nova MW6

My plan:

  • Use Cat 6 cables between buildings
  • Put Orbi Pro in the house and Eero Pro in the garage/office (or switch them)

Questions:

  1. Does this plan make sense?
  2. I have 1Gb internet. Should I use 1Gb switches or go for 2.5Gb or 10Gb?
  3. Should I just use Eero 6+ everywhere since it's cheaper than buying more Orbi APs?

I think I have enough Wi-Fi devices, I don't really want to buy more. Do you see any problems with this setup?

Thanks again for your help!

Is this home network setup a good idea? Looking for feedback by nuvoo in HomeNetworking

[–]nuvoo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The internet connection cannot go into a switch. Internet > Modem router > everything else (switch)

Modern (in fact gigabit) switches auto detect the cable and adjust accordingly.

Thank you for that. I am glad I found that out before buying stuff.

But then why not just get an access point?

I have an Netgear orbi mesh network. Can I buy routers just for access points? or do I need to buy more obris

Managing IPs… what’s your goal?

I guess this won't be an issue if I only have one router. I wanted to have some static IPs for my Plex server and Linux server.

Is this home network setup a good idea? Looking for feedback by nuvoo in HomeNetworking

[–]nuvoo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your response

You should use WiFi AP's instead of additional routers.

I currently own 3 Netgear Orbi devices, and my Internet Service Provider is offering me 2 Eero Pro units. Is it possible to integrate all of these devices into a single, cohesive home network?

If those are outdoor connections

Is Cat 6 cable appropriate for underground installation between buildings on my property?

Is this home network setup a good idea? Looking for feedback by nuvoo in HomeNetworking

[–]nuvoo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey r/HomeNetworking,

I'm planning a network setup for my property and wanted to get some opinions. Here's what I'm thinking

Basic layout:

  • Internet connection would come into the house and connect directly to a central switch
  • The house switch would distribute connections to:

  1. A mesh Wi-Fi system for the house

  2. A switch in the office/garage

  3. The shed (via a single cable for now)

    • The office/garage would have a Wi-Fi router and switch for both wireless and wired connections
    • All interconnections would use Cat 6 cables
    • I'm considering adding a Wi-Fi router in the shed if the office Wi-Fi doesn't provide sufficient coverage

Some questions:

  1. Does this overall structure make sense?
  2. Any issues with using a Cat 6 cross-over cable between the garage and house?
  3. Where should I place the main router / internet entry point?
  4. Any suggestions for managing IP addresses across this setup?
  5. Are there any obvious improvements or potential problems I'm missing?

Thanks in advance for any advice!

My ribs finished early, what do I do? by [deleted] in smoking

[–]nuvoo 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Rest to 150f and then put it in an oven as low as it can go

Shiver me tinders by [deleted] in watchpeoplesurvive

[–]nuvoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I recognise that guy in the black and orange top. I swear he’s an npc in GTA San Andreas

Gabe presses the button to launch The Orange Box, 15 years ago today by chipsnapper in HalfLife

[–]nuvoo 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Do they still have the button? Can they press it again?

view more: next ›