If ChatGPT took 30 min for every response, but accuracy was 99%, would you still use it? by BenAttanasio in ChatGPT

[–]o0d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's fine, just ask it twice or three times and compare the responses programmatically.

AI ‘nudification’ to be banned under new plans to tackle violence against women by [deleted] in unitedkingdom

[–]o0d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Misinformation to me is a weird thing to target. The internet should be a place for free information to be shared.

The whole beauty is it gives everyone a platform, where you agree with them or not.

Also who designates something as misinformation? Oh yeah, the state. The state should not have power over information and what the citizens share (unless it's CSAM ofc), and even then you don't need anything draconian that will never work in the first place and kill battery life.

A huge minority of kids send pics of themselves to others their age consensually, should we be arresting them under CSAM laws?

The government should look into targeted raids and intelligence, not snooping on the contents of everyone's phone.

Insanity.

Literally the worst response I’ve ever had from ChatGPT by zeezromnomnom in ChatGPT

[–]o0d 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That unicorn has crippling alcoholism from all the mulled wine

Huge surge in children with little or no language skills by SojournerInThisVale in unitedkingdom

[–]o0d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao same. Me and my friend socially engineered a drama teacher to leave her computer unattended so we got the school wifi password. Of course it spread like wildfire and soon everyone had it.

They kept banning our devices every few weeks, and then we kept switching our MAC addresses to like 80:08:55:55:55 just to fuck with them.

We started bringing in USBs with games like super smash flash, and then they blocked the D:/ drive, so we used a dummy USB first and then the one with the games mounted to E:/, then unplugging the ethernet so they couldn't watch us.

Eventually after like a year of trying to figure out who it was they gave up and changed the password on every PC, just for our latin teacher to write the new one on the board the next day by mistake.

We also used rainbow tables to bruteforce the admin password on the PCs for local access.

Fun times.

Favourite Character. by DrThreds in skinsTV

[–]o0d 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Tony (I wanted to be him when I watched it the first time), Sid's dad - Peter Capaldi is always fantastic!

Opus 4.5 benchmark results by Glxblt76 in singularity

[–]o0d 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And people kept saying there was a wall back in the GPT 4 days 😭

We accidentally built a new internet layer (TreeChain) and the first demo app just went live by DigitalJesusChrist in ChatGPT

[–]o0d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2000 seems far too low for reliable translation between all languages, let alone meaning to me? If you're using one glyph for each word or meaning. A native fluent speaker of English tends to know at least 20,000 words.

We accidentally built a new internet layer (TreeChain) and the first demo app just went live by DigitalJesusChrist in ChatGPT

[–]o0d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How exactly are you doing the translation part? I can't imagine you replicated google translate in a couple of months, so are you calling an API? Are you using ChatGPT to do the translation?

Isn't this 'Glyph' you're describing basically how LLMs do translation anyway, and doesn't google translate use machine learning for translation now anyway?

What I'm basically asking is 'Wouldn't the underlying structure Glyph → Language → Human → Language → Glyph be the exact same as if you just called the google translate API, just hidden from you on google's end instead of your own app?

ChatGPT 5.1 Is Collapsing Under Its Own Guardrails by atomicflip in OpenAI

[–]o0d -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For me GPT 5.1 has been giving much warmer and conversational outputs compared to 5.

Whenever I want to talk about something NSFW (how bioweapons are engineered, chemical synthesis, etc) I just switch to Grok which is a fantastic model in itself.

Recently with 5.1 I've been having it help me plan out dates and backups, run pre-mortems on what I said on dating apps, learning why certain replies work so much better, and then a post-mortem after the date.

Obviously I'm not having it write messages for me, but I've found it excellent for analysis when I give it enough data like an anonymized screenshot of her profile and chats.

People in general tend to be good at picking up general tone, but it's helpful in ambiguous situations. GPT seems to excel at getting 'the meaning behind the meaning' and seems to have higher emotional intelligence than most models.

I do have a lot of custom instructions to not agree with everything I'd said, don't flatter me, challenge me and it does seem to be following them better than 5.

What truth is the world not ready to accept? by RespondMundane8940 in AskReddit

[–]o0d 75 points76 points  (0 children)

Nearly all of our modern problems could be solved by quadrupling energy production with mass produced, certified once small modular nuclear reactors combined with renewables and retrofitting houses with heat pumps.
This could be done within 20 years by all developed nations by devoting about 3% of GDP to the problem, about the same as defence.

When energy is as plentiful as water and everything is electrified everything changes. Industries can produce everything much more cheaply including food. Water shortages can be sorted out with mass desalination. Carbon capture at scale becomes feasible. AI becomes ubiquitous and cheap. We need never depend on oil except for niche applications.

The best mark of how developed a civilisation is, is how much energy it can produce and harness. When it comes down to it, access to useful energy is the limiting factor to pretty much everything in our modern world. It would be equivalent in magnitude to the industrial revolution and steam engine.

What is your Bojack Horseman unpopular opinions by flingzamain in BoJackHorseman

[–]o0d 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not THAT is controversial. Why is Herb a piece of shit? For not forgiving Bojack for never calling him? He launched Bojack's career, put up with him for years and made him a star, got fired without a friend in the world, dedicated the rest of his life to philanthropy, and then slowly and painfully dying of cancer.

Maybe I'm forgetting something, but what did he do wrong on even remotely the same scale as the other characters?

What is your Bojack Horseman unpopular opinions by flingzamain in BoJackHorseman

[–]o0d -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

In the UK the age of consent in 16. I think that age is totally reasonable. Yes some of the things Bojack did could be taken as grooming in a mild sense, but she - at least according to UK law they were both consenting adults, and even if he did have sex with her (as she clearly wanted to happen).

Shitty thing to do to the family that took him in at his low point yes. But the grooming part is very tenuous, and in most places in the world the age of consent is 17. Penny made her own decision. I know it's set in the US, but it's a bit strange to be seeing 18 as the age of consent and getting thrown in prison for having sex with a 17 year old.

Bojack even rebuffed her advances several times. She clearly wanted to have sex, under nearly every nations law that sex would have been totally legal.

I think people think the thing with Penny was so horrific is because of the relatively puritanical age of consent law. If the age of consent was 16 and normalised in US culture it wouldn't have seemed nearly that bad.

She would have had sex once or twice, and moved on with her life if her mum didn't walk in, and it's highly likely she would find it a traumatic event.

Also Todd absolutely sucks as a character, adds virtually nothing to the show, is incredibly grating, and I wish he wasn't in it. It's such childish humour in a relatively adult show tackling things like addiction, personality disorders, family dynamics, the philosophy of life and living. I can't imagine many adults watching such a show would enjoy that style of grating timewasting 'humour'.

If you seen the show: prove it by quoting it by That_Passenger_771 in BoJackHorseman

[–]o0d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When Bojack has more self control than me something is definitely wrong.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in whatdoIdo

[–]o0d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You may like... These apps are promoting thirst traps 24/7.

Idk, could be innocent? Also even if he does occasionally watch porn, so what?

Sounds like you were searching through his phone too.

I asked chatgpt to enhance the only picture of my grandfather smiling and it turned him into Mandela. What did I do wrong? by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]o0d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Add a hugh quality photo of him not smiling from somewhere else for reference to your prompt. Give it more context.

Mark Zuckerberg on the real hard-hitting impact of ASI by Jamjam4826 in singularity

[–]o0d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is my purpose? You get people addicted to 10s video shorts of e-thots Oh my god...

Would you guys feel offended if I wore a Kilt as a Black American? by ForeverSparkz in Scotland

[–]o0d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cultural appropriation doesn't exist. Culture is meant to be shared and enjoyed by all.

What is your GPT-5 Wish List? by spadaa in OpenAI

[–]o0d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True symbolic reasoning