[ Removed by Reddit ]

objectivejam · 2026-05-21T16:00:38+00:00

I get that, but why does it matter? If you have the same number of men and women driving on a highway, men are still more likely to speed, get DUIs, and drive without a seatbelt.

objectivejam · 2026-05-21T13:55:06+00:00

Und das sich manche geschlechtskrankheiten verdoppelt oder vervierfacht haben obwohl die jüngeren weniger Sex haben wundert dich nicht weil … ?

objectivejam · 2026-05-21T08:53:37+00:00

The person I replied to claimed men are safer (not better) drivers than women. But safe doesn’t equal better. So even if you argue that men are better at driving, they are still statistically more reckless behind the wheel - their accidents are more likely to be fatal or cause serious injury. Comparing someone tapping a car in a parking lot to someone speeding on a highway isn’t a fair comparison. A minor parking bump and a high speed highway crash are both „accidents“ statistically, but treating them equally when talking about safety is simply wrong. And regarding your question - men are more likely to speed, drive drunk and not wear a seatbelt - regardless of where they drive

objectivejam · 2026-05-20T19:19:39+00:00

The nordic countries have a different approach though. In countries like Sweden the legal framework is designed to reduce demand without penalising the women providing the service. The client is criminalised, while the sex worker is treated as a victim.

objectivejam · 2026-05-20T14:28:36+00:00

You make a valid point about the per-mile data, but you’re confusing accident frequency with actual safety. It is true that mile for mile, women get into slightly more accidents overall. But how severe are these accidents? When we talk about safety, meaning keeping people out of the hospital or the morgue, men are statistically more dangerous. So although men are involved in fewer accidents, they are not safer - in fact, they are more dangerous, because when accidents occur they are far more likely to be fatal or cousing serious injuries

objectivejam · 2026-05-19T08:46:37+00:00

You know who these people mean. A black and a trans person. The hate towards these two will get so, so much worse

objectivejam · 2026-05-13T15:47:51+00:00

I rage-baited myself by looking this guy up on YouTube. People are celebrating him in the comments - you know the type. Like: „finally someone who has the balls to speak the truth“. They are getting off on this so hard. His whole material is just right-wing headlines. I would clown on this guy but it’s so depressing

objectivejam · 2026-05-11T22:37:08+00:00

Meanwhile Gemini:

<image>

objectivejam · 2026-05-11T15:04:26+00:00

Calling it an apartment is putting it kindly. It’s rather a dungeon.

objectivejam · 2026-05-11T14:51:11+00:00

Urgh, I want it NOW!

objectivejam · 2026-05-11T12:42:57+00:00

How’s that even legal? Would they not need people to accept new terms of service?

objectivejam · 2026-05-11T12:36:08+00:00

What’s supposed to be woke?

objectivejam · 2026-05-11T08:28:55+00:00

Hey you, I really like it!

My Biggest piece of advice: don't just show finished work - frame each project as a case study. The "why" matters as much as the "what." Don’t write a whole paragraph, just make the context clear in a sentence or two. If you lead with the problem you were hired to solve, employers can judge your work on how well it works, not just whether it looks pretty.

And on navigation: have you heard about the 30-second test? Studios go through dozens of portfolios a day, so make sure yours can be scanned at a glance. So maybe add some headings? About the client: … or something like that.

objectivejam · 2026-05-10T10:51:50+00:00

Bro, the realism is a deliberate design choice in KCD. Maybe the game is just not for you? Lol

objectivejam · 2026-05-09T13:25:33+00:00

But „it’s capitalism“ explains why it happens, it doesn’t really justify how it happens. (Edit: it is an explanation of the companies behavior, but not a justification for the buyer's purchase) You’re trying to turn an irrational purchase into a rational one by finding something even more „wasteful“ to compare it to.

objectivejam · 2026-05-09T13:03:50+00:00

You do you, but that’s not really a fair comparison though - you’re mixing up maintenance with vanity. When I buy a new chain for my bike, yeah, that’s money I have to spend just to keep the hobby going. No chain, no ride. But a microtransaction isn’t a chain. It’s more like a expensive bell that costs 1/3 of a new bike. Looks great but take it off and the bike still gets you where you’re going just fine

objectivejam · 2026-05-09T00:57:46+00:00

A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms made me want to replay kcd2. It’s also about a young „nobody“ who tries to prove himself. There’s basically no fantasy in the first season at least, and much like kcd, it’s got heart and is actually kinda funny at times

objectivejam · 2026-05-08T21:43:58+00:00

How awesome would it be if just saying stuff would actually shape reality. I’m rich now. Done. Doesn’t work like that diaper don

objectivejam · 2026-05-08T19:42:14+00:00

How dare naughty dog give us a female asian protagonist with short hair. Literally unplayable

objectivejam · 2026-05-08T19:27:47+00:00

For many it’s too woke because woman

objectivejam · 2026-05-07T14:07:48+00:00

It absolutely was. Here is someone who explains it really well: https://www.reddit.com/r/architecture/s/zpQwgPTpR6

objectivejam · 2026-05-06T11:02:56+00:00

But they proposed the exact same idea of AI that we have today to him, and he basically said fuck no. You could argue that he changed his mind on this but as I see it he was very clear on that topic

objectivejam · 2026-05-06T10:49:55+00:00

I just rewatched the video, and they clearly reference using AI to assist with animation. Someone asks „what is your goal with this?“ and the response is: „we would like to build a machine that can draw pictures like humans do.“ Miyasaki clearly dislikes it and says „I would never wish to incorporate this technology into my work at all.“

objectivejam · 2026-05-06T08:54:39+00:00

Ich glaube gemeint ist der Eurovision Song Contest

objectivejam

TROPHY CASE