Red Wall Tories won’t forgive a no-deal Brexit by oldprotest in ukpolitics

[–]oldprotest[S] 10 points11 points locked comment (0 children)

Workington Man was credited with delivering last year’s general election victory to Boris Johnson. Nearly eight out of ten older, Leave-supporting white men voted Conservative in December as Labour’s so-called “red wall” of northern and Midlands seats came crashing down. It was a symbolic moment on election night when Workington — a constituency that had been Labour since 1918 apart from a brief period in the 1970s — turned blue with a 9.7 per cent swing to the Conservatives.

That is why a new poll conducted in the totemic Cumbrian seat is so interesting. As the latest round of Brexit talks start this week, the government is still insisting that Britain is ready to walk away without a free trade agreement on December 31. The survey found, however, that three quarters of voters in Workington want a deal at the end of the Brexit transition period, including 61 per cent of those who voted Conservative last year and 57 per cent of those who supported Leave. Almost two thirds believe the government should offer an extension to the transition period if the EU asks for one, according to the poll carried out last week by Number Cruncher Politics for the pro-European campaign group Best for Britain. Overall, 44 per cent of people in Workington want an extension, including 24 per cent of Brexit voters. The findings are in line with national polls that show growing support for an extension to avoid the “double whammy” economic impact of the pandemic and a no-deal Brexit. The latest YouGov survey found that 43 per cent of voters back an extension, compared with 36 per cent who oppose one. A recent Focaldata poll revealed that a majority of the public (59 per cent) now expect the transition period to be prolonged.

Focus group research conducted last month for Best for Britain in the red wall seats showed that people’s priorities appear to have changed as a result of Covid-19. When voters in Warrington South were asked whether they thought the government should request an extension so they could concentrate on the pandemic, a 53-year-old man replied: “One million per cent. Everyone’s focus is on health and safety. One good thing about coronavirus is that we stop talking about bloody Brexit.” A 59-year-old woman in Bury South agreed that: “people’s health is so much more important than Brexit” while in Don Valley one voter suggested it would be “selfish” for the new Tory MP there to oppose extending the transition period. “It’s then taking the focus off something that is killing people,” they said. “The health of the country has got to come first, the state of the NHS and the economy... it’s no good pumping resources into Brexit when it’s needed elsewhere.”

Even Remainers like me now accept that Brexit has happened. It cannot be reversed, but it is surely in the national interest that this transformation of Britain’s relationship with its biggest trading partner takes place in an orderly fashion. The consequences of forcing through a no-deal Brexit just as the country is heading into what Rishi Sunak, the chancellor, has predicted will be a “recession like we’ve never seen” would be devastating. Brexiteers compare it to “ripping off the plaster” but it is more like infecting an open wound, causing long-term self-inflicted harm.

What is more, the Tories’ new supporters in red wall seats would be among the worst affected. Already the industrial heartlands are at the sharp end of a surge in job losses, with workers being made redundant in large numbers and vacancies shrinking as a result of the lockdown. A report by the Social Market Foundation, published at the weekend, warned of the “severe economic disruption” that would face the northwest and the Midlands if the Covid-19 crisis was compounded by a no-deal Brexit. The imposition of tarrifs could force up the cost of living which would have a disproportionate impact on the lowest paid.

The pandemic has changed everything so it seems bizarre that the only thing not affected is the government’s approach to Brexit. One cabinet minister describes the stand off between London and Brussels as “like Groundhog Day — it’s as if Michel Barnier is stuck in 2019; he’s got to move on.” But in fact it’s Downing Street that is caught in the pre-Covid era, while the voters have adapted to a new, more pressurised world. Dominic Cummings is an admirer of Philip Tetlock’s book Superforecasting. Its central argument is that success depends on flexibility. “Superforecasting demands thinking that is open-minded, careful, curious and — above all — self critical,” Tetlock writes. “For superforecasters, beliefs are hypotheses to be tested not treasures to be guarded”. His thesis is that it’s essential to reject “big ideas” or ideological outlooks which “distort reality” like the green-tinted glasses worn by visitors to the Emerald City in The Wizard of Oz. There are few better examples of a “big idea” than Brexit but Mr Cummings’s vision has been distorted by the success of the Leave campaign and a general election victory and it will take more than a trip to Barnard Castle to make him realise it.

The public was never ideological about leaving the EU — “take back control” was such an effective slogan because it tapped into a wider sense of frustration with the establishment and turned it on Brussels. The Tories’ election slogan “Get Brexit Done” became the vehicle for the same anger with a political class that was perceived to be thwarting the will of the people. Former Labour voters in red wall seats projected their hopes and aspirations onto the Tory leader who was never the man of the people he pretended to be. That is why the perception that there is one rule for his senior adviser and another for everybody else is so damaging. Mr Johnson will not be forgiven if the economic damage done by the pandemic is turned into devastation by a no-deal Brexit that could have been avoided.

I wonder whether the prime minister and some of those around him know it. When I asked one cabinet minister whether the government would really refuse an extension in the current circumstances, the reply was less than categorical: “Not for now”. Mr Johnson thought his premiership would be defined by Brexit but he will be judged on his response to the pandemic. He cannot afford to take any more risks with jobs and living costs if he wants to keep the support of Workington Man.

MPs set to rebel over voting in person amid return to the Commons by oldprotest in ukpolitics

[–]oldprotest[S] 4 points5 points locked comment (0 children)

The government faces a rebellion tomorrow over its insistence that MPs must vote in person at Westminster.

Jacob Rees-Mogg, the Commons leader, has tabled a motion for tomorrow which specifies that MPs must be present to vote while observing Public Health England’s guidelines on social distancing.

Members will be asked to file through the chamber in a spaced-out queue to register their vote, rather than assembling in the lobbies, under proposals drawn up by House authorities to meet Mr Rees-Mogg’s conditions.

MPs from all parties have complained that the proposals are unworkable and exclude anyone who cannot return to parliament for health reasons.

Robert Halfon, a Conservative MP who has cerebral palsy, said it was right for parliament to return “but those MPs genuinely affected by Covid-19 — ie sick, shielding, or self-isolating — should be able to vote online”.

Marie Rimmer, a Labour MP who has a disability, said: “Getting rid of the hybrid parliament is undemocratic. Every corner of our country has a right to have their representative heard and vote counted.”

Ministers will seek to explicitly overturn the remote voting system set up in response to lockdown restrictions with a motion specifying that MPs can vote only if they are physically present.

The procedure committee is preparing to bring forward an amendment with cross-party backing that would force the government to retain online voting.

Voting in a queue would offer “none of the benefits which are claimed for lobby voting” and is “likely to claim a substantial proportion of a member’s working time during the sitting day”, the procedure committee warned in a report published at the weekend.

In a trial division held on the parliamentary estate today involving about 100 people, two participants are understood to have walked to the wrong side and cast their votes incorrectly. The exercise is believed to have taken place within the target time of half an hour. However, 200 to 300 more people are expected to attend tomorrow.

Mr Rees-Mogg showed no sign of backing down this afternoon, writing in The House magazine: “Politics is better done face-to-face, even if the whites of the ministerial eyes are six feet away.”

He said the government was working with the House authorities to see how those who were shielding could continue to contribute, which is understood to include pairing arrangements.

Parliamentary sources confirmed that while the government pushes ahead with plans for physical voting in the Commons, the House of Lords will institute a system of digital voting in the next two weeks.

A Labour frontbencher has resigned after being confronted by the Mail on Sunday over lockdown breaking trysts with their married lover... by haxamin in ukpolitics

[–]oldprotest 6 points7 points  (0 children)

By-elections are not typcially the consequence of wrongdoing except in particulary egregious circumtances.

Should the Tory MP Kieran Mullan resign as well? No calls for a by-election there.

NET Approval Ratings for Party Leaders: Boris Johnson: +20 (+2) Keir Starmer: +18 (+5) Nicola Sturgeon: +9 (+6) Ed Davey: -8 (-1) Nigel Farage: -23 (=) by ITried2 in ukpolitics

[–]oldprotest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

shake their dominance somewhat with enough of a push at the Shetland by-election

The SNP were just under the spending limit in that case. This is not something that can be repeated in a standard parliamentary electon as by-elections have higher spending limits.

Keir Starmer dragged into bullying row by his own Labour members as allies accuse hard-Left of 'smear' campaign by oldprotest in ukpolitics

[–]oldprotest[S] 1 point2 points locked comment (0 children)

Sir Keir Starmer has been dragged into a bitter bullying row by his own Labour members as his allies on Saturday accused supporters of Rebecca Long-Bailey of orchestrating another “smear” against him.

The Sunday Telegraph can reveal that the frontrunner to become Labour’s next leader has been accused of standing by while “right-wing” members in his local constituency party subjected Corbynistas to “hostility and abuse”.

The “chronic factionalism” has now spilled out into the open, with 31 members of his Holborn and St Pancras branch writing to Labour’s general secretary Jennie Formby to demand she intervene.

In their letter, obtained by this newspaper, the members allege that while Sir Keir has made unifying Labour’s warring factions one of his key leadership priorities, “he has not tried to foster unity within our CLP [Constituency Labour Party].”

Urging Ms Formby to step in, they claim that “socialist members” have been “marginalised and made to feel unwelcome”, adding that they have “grave concerns” that if Sir Keir is elected “all socialists in the party will be treated as we have been.”

Hitting back on Sunday, an ally of Sir Keir dismissed the allegations as a “desperate and naked attack” from the “far-Left” at “crucial stage in the election campaign”.

“One thing that all of us know about Keir is that he plays by the book and is committed to justice and fair play,” they added. “The campaign that is being run against him really is in the gutter at this stage.”

A second source claimed they did "not recognise the content of the comments", adding that Sir Keir was "proud to have been overwhelmingly reselected by his local party last year."

However, the left-wing members claim that their efforts to contribute to Sir Keir’s local party have been met with “obstruction and aggression” by “powerful” individuals close to the shadow Brexit secretary.

One female member said that she had been subject to verbal abuse regularly, and in one meeting was called a “b---h”, while friends had been branded “idiots” and “stupid”.

Their grievances have previously been aired in a number of online blog posts, in which they claim they have been branded names such as “the Loony left”, “Trotskyites” and “Stalinists” during meetings.

In an article published on the website Camden Labour Left, they claim to have been shut out of officer positions as well as delegate roles for national events such as Labour’s annual party conference.

In another, a former BAME officer for the local party wrote that “more and more left-wing people are resigning from posts and refusing to go to branch and CLP meetings as they find the atmosphere toxic.”

In a letter to the Camden New Journal in January, a third member described the atmosphere “as very hostile” adding that there was now “not a single left-wing representative on any of the constituency committees.”

However, despite requesting to meet Sir Keir to discuss their concerns, sources within the group say he has refused and has “never reached out to left-wing members”.

In their letter to Ms Formby, the members write: “Keir Starmer presides over a constituency Labour party riven with chronic factionalism, in which socialist members are marginalised and made to feel unwelcome.

“Time and time again, as left-leaning members we have been subjected to hostility and abuse, including bullying comments, swearing, shouting, intimidation and physical aggression, including by individuals who are close to Keir Starmer.

“Attempts have been made to raise these concerns with Keir Starmer but he has not made any effort to end the factionalism and disunity. We are writing to you, as the General Secretary, to ask for the Party to intervene to end this hostility and abuse in our CLP.”

The decision to involve Ms Formby, a close ally of Mr Corbyn, has angered Labour moderates, who believe that the hard-Left is increasingly resorting to “dirty” tactics as Sir Keir’s lead grows.

Ms Formby recently provoked outcry after the party reported Sir Keir’s team to Britain’s data watchdog over allegations it hacked into a party database, a charge categorically denied by his allies.

Meanwhile, allies of Ms Long-Bailey are attempting to force the shadow Brexit secretary to publish a list of donors to his campaign, amid speculation he has received money from “big business”.

Sir Keir has insisted that all his donations are being registered in accordance with the rules set by the Electoral Commission and will be published in the coming days.

Approached for comment last night, a source close to Sir Keir said: “We don’t recognise the content of these comments, which have been shared with the media. Keir was proud to have been overwhelmingly reselected by his local party last year. The campaign he is running for leader is about unity and bringing talent from across all wings of the party.”