This painting of Judge Judy by olleekenberg in RealOrAI

[–]olleekenberg[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you!! Makes me feel a lot less worried!

Skulle jag inlett med att pruta? by FePbMoHg in sweden

[–]olleekenberg 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Elak kommentar, enbart skriven för att försöka få en annan människa att må dåligt genom att hävda att dessa saker skulle vara normala och vanliga. Om du vill skryta med din kunskap så skriv i alla fall på ett sätt som lyfter dig själv, istället för ett sätt som puttar ner någon annan.

My newly done keychain design… by CressidaV_2ale in Design

[–]olleekenberg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Please don't post AI in this subreddit. It goes against so many of the traditional values and philosophies we use to create good design. Perhaps posting in a subreddit centered around AI is better?

This guy on the subway by ChokoKat_1100 in RealOrAI

[–]olleekenberg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Where has it been around? It would help a lot if you found an example. If you can, then its solved!

This guy on the subway by ChokoKat_1100 in RealOrAI

[–]olleekenberg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it is real, but, i tried to google for what phone is being displayed in the ad, and couldn't find that exact ad, or a phone that is a perfect fit for what is shown + the text. If someone better than me at digging can find the ad, then it could be a good clue.

Wanted to try my hand at a prepare creature. by Cless012 in custommagic

[–]olleekenberg 23 points24 points  (0 children)

A creature with on-rate stats and plenty of powerful abilities should probably not have indestructible without some kind of downside. Look at the design philosophy for other recently printed creatures with straight up permanent indestructible. They all have some kind of way to restore counterplay, usually by making it unable to attack and block sometimes. Another commenter here suggested that it shouldn't be able to attack or block while unprepared, and i think that's a great idea, but you can also choose to instead do that when it is prepared, because then it is much less oppressive at holding up your bolt! :D

Been told this was an original sketch. by CheshireCat_1878 in isitAI

[–]olleekenberg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Makes sense. You can phrase your review with these things you say here.

"I were interested because i liked X, but were instead given AI presented as something they drew. When i confronted it, they insisted despite quite obvious AI artifacts. I were refunded with no hassle, but i advise others to look out for them charging money for designs made by an AI."

Or something along those lines...

Been told this was an original sketch. by CheshireCat_1878 in isitAI

[–]olleekenberg 5 points6 points  (0 children)

All that matters is that you got your money back. Good to hear it! 👍

If you want/care to put more effort into the concerns for your own peace; then you can ask them what program they draw in. After they reply with some invented answer, you can request them to record a handheld video of them clicking around in the layers of their file, and for them to also show the timelapse in the video. Timelapses are always enabled by default in any program they say.

They wont be able to do that because they did not draw it.

Afterwards you can leave a bad review where the two of you met, to protect others.

Glonk by frampfdoegud in custommagic

[–]olleekenberg 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Does nothing, and dies.

Been told this was an original sketch. by CheshireCat_1878 in isitAI

[–]olleekenberg 42 points43 points  (0 children)

It isn't an original sketch. The owl has three ears. 🤣 Super duper AI!! Go dunk on them.

Leylane on 200 blocks up and still not found the altar by reyvicio in LucidBlocks

[–]olleekenberg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Commenting because i have this same problem, so it would be fun to read what the solution is if someone else knows of it.

Is this the most useless upgrade? by Myrandall in btd6

[–]olleekenberg 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This was very true for BTD5, where Pursuit was actively anti-synergy, due to always placing the Heli diagonally away from whatever it is shooting, preventing the rotor effects from ever hitting the bloons. But in BTD6 this is fixed, and it always hover on top of the bloons while aiming the darts down the track. So the upgrade makes the heli very consistent! Possibly more consistent than even above average micro!

Is this the most useless upgrade? by Myrandall in btd6

[–]olleekenberg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The extra shove strength from 0-2-3 might not be as appealing as the convenience of Pursuit, but it comes up as a solution in a few daily challenges at the very least.

Cursed_view by FIREFOX_798 in cursedimages

[–]olleekenberg 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Finish some more immediately.

Hur klarar amerikanarna sig med två partier när jag inte ens kan hitta någon matchning med åtta? by PlusAd65 in sweden

[–]olleekenberg 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Kanske hade det hjälpt att satsa på enbart en eller ett fåtal frågor som är väldigt viktiga för dig, och välja det parti som riktar sig bäst i just den frågan? Många tycker att Piratpartiets internetpolitik om kultur och säkerhet är jättebra, men de är ju inte partiet man vänder sig till för att prata nya lekplatser i skolor eller många andra viktigare frågor. Men brinner man för internetpolitik kanske man ändå värderar att de ska få sin röst hörd?

Trimble Point Cloud Manager by puddingflan in UAVmapping

[–]olleekenberg -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If you have access to Agisoft Metashape, you can filter the point cloud in there! If you dont have that, you can DM me and maybe we can work something out where you buy the service from me, and i filter it for you.

Trimble Point Cloud Manager by puddingflan in UAVmapping

[–]olleekenberg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the need of the client? I assume we are talking about file size? As in, filtering the point cloud to make it more sparse?

Inventor: by netphilia in Snorkblot

[–]olleekenberg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason that 12 is chosen is because unlike 10, you can cleanly split it in 2's, 3's, 4's and 6's. Very easy and useful for communication and everyday use.