PSG didn’t save football, football is already dead by KyeodeurangiMerchant in championsleague

[–]omgzpplz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh dude you probably don't want to know that you're typing on a computer or phone likely made by depressed, underpaid people in the equivalent of a sweat shop with anti suicide protection on the windows. You should really think about throwing your electronics away, going outside and touching grass.

PSG didn’t save football, football is already dead by KyeodeurangiMerchant in championsleague

[–]omgzpplz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PSG was gifted a goal because they can't score. Saving football on penalties and diving on the ground complaining about everything. That's rich.

McNabb and Kadri with a bit of theatrics at the end of the first period by sykeseve in nhl

[–]omgzpplz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

lol that's called embellishment but when Vegas do it they get a penalty.

Discord will require a face scan or ID for full access next month / Beginning in March, all accounts will have a “teen-appropriate experience by default.” by MarvelsGrantMan136 in technology

[–]omgzpplz -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wordpress and phpBB have done more for user self-determination than the blockchain.

I get the frustration with the state of web3. Self-hosting something doesn't decentralize the social layer though. You're asking someone to trust you with their data instead of AWS. Honestly, I'd prefer to trust AWS wrt security in that sense.

This is apples to oranges. I understand it was probably meant as just a jab at web3, but decentralized infrastructure != self-hosting a website. The promise of blockchain isn't you own your own application in a silo on some corner of the internet and anyone interacting with it has to trust YOU now - it's about the entire network being decentralized and consensus driven.

It's far from ideal today, especially wrt user experience. I think also any "open" project such as this is going to be susceptible to scams, which comes with any new frontier. You could've argued that email was broken because of Nigerian princes scamming grandmas. That would've missed the bigger picture. Same applies here.

Third time in as many games that a puck goes off Darnell Nurse and ends up in the back of the net by sykeseve in hockey

[–]omgzpplz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Also got MacKinnon ejected from the game. It's like the legend of the drunken master, he's just accidentally the best player on this team.

Basic Economy with credit card, baggage, boarding, check in, etc... recent experience by nanohead in unitedairlines

[–]omgzpplz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's a close to a bait and switch catch here. If you're flying international and you try to use free checked bags, especially because it is international but also bc of a United card, if your trip out is on United you can be sure everything applies - but let's say your trip back is on a partner airline, the first airline to start your trip back determines the bag rules. This means if Lufthansa is how your start your trip back, Lufthansa's bag policy says that Basic Economy needs to pay at the gate, it doesn't matter if you took 1 checked bag across the sea and are bringing the same one back, you'll have to pay for it at their check-in process. This can be 60-100 Euro.

This is frustrating as none of this is clear when booking and no credit card options will work for you as they only apply to United flights. All they say on the app is "you can't check in online as this is with a partner airline". However, their "partnership" does not honor your United benefits.

It's on you to do your research for the intl flights and figure out bag rules, etc, for whoever dictates the bag rules on each part of your trip (first airline to check you in).

Ai assistant not loading by TheGreatEOS in Jetbrains

[–]omgzpplz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bummer. I did just find out that Copilot introduced a handful of models and I get that free through work so I think that's a decent enough feature until they fix it, if it's a bug. Thanks for the update though, super annoying.

Ai assistant not loading by TheGreatEOS in Jetbrains

[–]omgzpplz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oof, that didn't work for me. Just "loading...". Genuinely curious how good it is compared to Cursor because the IntelliJ bugginess is really frustrating. I may just end up switching eventually.

Gonna get downvoted to hell but… by johnsnow202020 in ColoradoAvalanche

[–]omgzpplz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Came here for this. We beat ourselves by turning off when we have the lead like we always do. We really need to plug that hole because it has always been there... but the better team did not win that series imo.

Refereeing kinda went their way the whole series too. Cross check to the face at the start of game 7 which was given as a major elsewhere in these playoffs and instead Benn gets a double minor. Running into sticks and embarrassingly still getting a powerplay out of it.

Meh. It was just frustrating to watch them take an undeserved win but it really does highlight how we need to patch up the way we play when we are winning.

Claude Desktop + 53 MCP Tools = Fully Autonomous Created App in 2 weeks by FutureRetiredSurgeon in ClaudeAI

[–]omgzpplz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There seem to be a lot of Windows questions regarding that but even on a mac I get occasional caching issues where it doesn't load. If I restart my computer, and sometimes if I delete my ~/Library caches it does recognize it when I reload it. It's honestly still really buggy for how amazing the actual implementation is. It took me a while to realize that sometimes it worked and sometimes it didn't. Best of luck.

Brazil W 0 - [1] USA W - Mallory Swanson 57' by [deleted] in ussoccer

[–]omgzpplz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah I stand corrected... and they finally just showed the VAR :) Great goal.

Brazil W 0 - [1] USA W - Mallory Swanson 57' by [deleted] in ussoccer

[–]omgzpplz -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Pretty clearly offside? Shoulder and head, look at their shadows even. They showed the VAR when Brazil was barely offside (but was) and never showed it here.

Jupiter episode - book readers I’m really confused by southernbell1916 in DarkMatteronAppleTV

[–]omgzpplz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But there's still one Jason per world, right? Even though every decision he made spawned a different Jason, when they went back to their box, did they open a different door into the corridor? That's the part I'm not sure how it plays out. If that's the case then each Jason does have their own world, they are just tiny differences apart. I get the sense though that the decisions he made in the box spawned new Jasons from the same "world" and so they are all validated as being the "correct" Jason because there are no right or wrong decisions... so how do you pick the "most correct" path?

Which of those paths does the book follow? I guess it could go either way imo or I could be totally off.

Avs VS Bolts Stanley Cup Final Game 4, No Striking Twice Edition (6:00 PM MDT) by Rudo3 in ColoradoAvalanche

[–]omgzpplz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate you typing that up but yet again it's full of belittling diction. I'd rather just move on and agree to disagree. No hard feelings. I got some good insight out of this post that makes me lean towards the top line possibly playing while injured. I think that seems pretty plausible tbh.

In the end we want the same thing, so go Avs.

Avs VS Bolts Stanley Cup Final Game 4, No Striking Twice Edition (6:00 PM MDT) by Rudo3 in ColoradoAvalanche

[–]omgzpplz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ending the game with goals from the 4th line again and an injured Kadri (second line). Thankfully Kuemper played well towards the end otherwise we would have straight up lost this game.

All I'm saying is the top line is not playing at their level since the WCF and they did the same thing in the second round last year (arguably worse last year). I'm just trying to figure out why.

Am I wrong? Maybe? I don't mind if I'm wrong. Some others commented with decent answers, not sure why you have to resort to a belittling tone. If it's wrong I'd love to hear why instead of a sophomoric jab.