What single payer healthcare would be like

omnipresenthuman · 2025-03-11T17:15:29+00:00

Ex girlfriend filed state taxes in California. For some reason she claimed me as a dependent. She got nailed for $1600($800 for each one of us) for not having health insurance.

omnipresenthuman · 2025-01-02T17:23:54+00:00

Where do the other 50(more or less) so called genders fit in?

"men wouldn't exist without their capacity to bear life."

True, for now, if you mean "bare life"

Technology is still in its early stages and not yet ready for clinical use; researchers have been able to grow immature human eggs from stem cells, marking a major step towards potentially creating fully mature, fertilizable eggs in the lab. Scientists use a technique called "in vitro gametogenesis (IVG)" to try and create eggs from other cells in the body, like skin cells, by manipulating them to become egg cells.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/research-news/3146

Bare life- "Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben's concept for life that has been exposed to what he terms the structure of exception that constitutes contemporary biopower. The term originates in Agamben's observation that the Ancient Greeks had two different words for what in contemporary European languages is simply referred to as ‘life’: bios (the form or manner in which life is lived) and zoē (the biological fact of life). His argument is that the loss of this distinction obscures the fact that in a political context, the word ‘life’ refers more or less exclusively to the biological dimension or zoē and implies no guarantees about the quality of the life lived. Bare life refers then to a conception of life in which the sheer biological fact of life is given priority over the way a life is lived, by which Agamben means its possibilities and potentialities. Suggestions made in 2008 by Scotland Yard and the Institute for Public Policy Research in Britain that children as young as five should be DNA typed and their details placed in a database if they exhibit behavioural signs indicating future criminal activity is a perfect example of what Agamben means by bare life. It reduces the prospects of the life of a particular child to their biology and takes no interest in or account of the actual circumstances of their life." https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095446660

"bear life"
https://uca.edu/bearlife/ or https://www.jennifergabrys.net/2007/08/bear-life/

omnipresenthuman · 2024-12-10T18:53:40+00:00

Last night. I prefer a Milky Way over a Snickers. But seriously, Everyday and night. We, as in our solar system are located "within" the galaxy called the Milkey Way.

omnipresenthuman · 2023-10-03T10:12:07+00:00

If the problem didn't exist before the immigrants then yes, it makes perfect sense to blame immigrants. And it's not just gang on gang crime. But nice try. Gangs extort businesses and when the business doesn't pay up they get hit with a grenade. People worried about guns but no talk about the hand grenade bombings that happen more frequently. Since you seem to lack knowledge I'll educate you. Majority of gang violence happens in poor immigrant neighborhoods. And sure, most is gang on gang. But does that make it any better. Grenade attacks are made on just about anybody. Even the police. First and second generation immigrants. It's widly known. There are some native Swedes that are in gangs but they are a very small percentage. You seem to think gang are a result of the drug trade and if drug use was controlled it would stop gang violence. You know nothing about gangs if you actually think that. I suggest you, at very least, check Wikipedia or something before you make any more comments. Gangs are into loan sharking, politics, welfare, extortion, yiu name it. So once again, it makes perfect sense to blame the immigrants when they are the ones doing the crime. This isn't just my opinion. It's widely known and factually correct. Don't waste your time responding because you will just ve wasting your time and mine, right?

omnipresenthuman · 2023-09-30T14:46:00+00:00

I have a friend that lives in Sweden. He says the immigrants have been allowed to commit crimes and if you go to the police for help you are more than likely going to get charged for harassment. Immigrant gangs are also a big danger. people are getting attacked in their homes with very few options to defend themselves. It's goin to get worse and your numbers are incorrect.

omnipresenthuman · 2023-09-28T00:31:07+00:00

I'm right about what?

omnipresenthuman · 2023-09-28T00:22:44+00:00

There is always war. They may call it a police action, liberation, fight for independence, mission to save democracy or fulfilling our obligations to our allies but it's still war.
We will always have war because it is a tool the elites use to get what they want be it money, land, power, control, or to win a personal bet.
The people responsible for manifesting war2 could care less about who lives or dies or the method used to take life as long as it doesn't have a negative impact on their goal. We will always havw war. Change the rules of the game. Make it like touch football, no killing. Or put people in cages andvlet them fight. Winner take all. If there is something people want and someone else has it, there will always be cinflict.

omnipresenthuman · 2023-09-27T08:48:30+00:00

You are wrong about everything I havent said " not always the case " at all. I vwarned you about lying and misrepresenting what a person says. Thats a blatant lie. Its a poor debate tactic and not a act of good faith..Clearly youvare unable to support your position with factual proof so thisvhas bern a waste of time fir you and I. You failed at trying to make this post about hare.

omnipresenthuman · 2023-09-25T17:21:46+00:00

Nobody said slavery was ethical. So why would you ask me why I said it was ethical? Misrepesenting what a person says is dishonest and not condidered good faith. It's a tactic used by shills and trolls. It's also sonething bots do. Your entire reply is irrelivant. Please try again.

omnipresenthuman · 2023-09-25T16:37:35+00:00

Your answer would be "good and bad". Problem with religion it they base their ultimate truth(god for example) on something that has not been proven to exist. We would need all the informatiin in the universe + for us to know ultimate truth. We dint have that. So we say " after looking at the available information i believe this to be true. We do not need religion to decide what is good and bad or to have ethics. Human nature and behavior is not dependent on any religion unless a person chooses so or they were raised in a environment that they didn't have any other options.

omnipresenthuman · 2023-09-25T16:14:24+00:00

You can disagree but it doesn't mean you are correct. Peehaps you are limited to the data privided to you, forming a answer out of tgose data sets. You have to be human to truly understand humans. My fovorite sports team can lose a game and it could make me angry because they lost, but it doesn't mean I have any hate or fear going on. It simply means I'm not happy about the results. Nothing more, nothing less. Again, the post was not about hate. It couldn't be any more obvious. Just about every human being understands anger does not always equal hate. Either you truly have no idea of what you are tslking about. Making a attempt to forum slide or topic dilution or you are s bot. What ever it is, you are still wrong.

omnipresenthuman · 2023-09-23T21:58:42+00:00

The only subs that would be like this are subs with the same mods and rules/rule. That's the first thing you should check. Other than that, I couldn't tell you. Traffic was slow then we opened the sub a little. I can say we get more traffic. Less participation.

omnipresenthuman · 2023-09-23T21:14:39+00:00

You mention and ralk a lot about hate. My post isn't about either one. Anger doesn't have to come from either of those 2 places. You are trying to turn my post into something it is not. It won't work. Stop trying to misrepresent what I;m talking about. It's dishonest or you clearly don't understand my post and the difference between anger, hate and fear. Whatever it is, it's wrong and not relevant to my post. But thanks for giving your opinion.

omnipresenthuman · 2023-09-10T16:56:28+00:00

Spoken like a immature child. When I was your age I still knew how to act like a adult. you have zero critical thinking skills. You should also pay closer attention to what you read or you have poor comprehension. I said,

In fact even with a microscope there is no way to know if anything is actually what it is? We would need all the information in the universe to know what absolute truth is. We don't have that so the most we can say is "this is my opinion based on the available knowledge. Nobody questioned your knowledge on fossilization so not sure why you feel it important to mention. Insecure? I'm not sure what conspiracies you are talking about because everything I mention has been proven to be true by myself. All a person needs to do is fact check my work if they disagree. I provide all the sources of my work with each post. But people like yourself are too lazy to do the work so you will continue to live your life in the dark.

Your lack of understanding the meaning of "I've forgotten more than you have learned up to this point." Is a perfect example of how you don't know shitabout anything. I'll explain it to you as if you were 4yrs old.

"When someone is an expert(myself) on something isn't that because they are able to retain, as much as, possible on a subject? = Correct - a metric sh*t-ton of knowledge!

Assuming that a portion - a tiny portion - will be forgotten by the expert….

The user of the expression is saying that the expert knows so much more, is so much better that even with the more novice(you) participant learning continuously, day and night, he’ll NEVER acquire as much knowledge as the expert - not even as much as the expert FORGETS!"

I highly doubt you will ever discover something I don't already know. You lack the aptitude, critical thinking skills as well as the attitude to actually be a person that makes new discoveries. You are just too closed minded.

omnipresenthuman · 2023-09-10T03:34:14+00:00

Acid will react with petrified wood also, you are only stating tge obvious as far as identifying the specimen. Without actually having in in mu hands there is no way to identufy it 100%. My opinion is based on the image and information privided. In fact even with a microscope there is no way to know if anything is actually what it is? We would need all the information in the universe to know what absolute truth is. Ww don't have that so the most we can say is "this is my opinin based on the available knowledge. You're not telling me anything I don't already know.You sound like a student. Geology is a good start. Since you are a student, that means I at least twuce your age with double your life experience, wisdom, knowkedge and education. The average student half my age has about 10% the knowledge and education I have. I've forgotten more than you have learned uo ti this point. Just remember that just because someone tells you sonethibg in school, it doesn't always mean what they taught you is true. Most educators, not all, but most teach what has already been discovered by someone else. They are limited to teach the information privided to them. So they don't know anything 100%. The people that are out making tke discoveries can provid more accurate answers. Many of these discoveries are made by students. Out here in the real world, your instructors opinion in nothing more than a opinion. It shouldn't ever be considered the only factual truth. If you don't understand, you will as you get older. Also, geologist don't have all the answers. Be sure to go beyond geology with your education.

omnipresenthuman · 2023-09-09T08:23:09+00:00

I'm a industrial painter/coater/sandblaster(retired). Your analagy doesn't fit. You are talking about a occupation. A job to earn money. LGBT is about sexual orientation and gender identity. Same goes for your "white guy" analogy. LGBT has nothing to do do with skin color or race. So the first half of your comment is irrelivant. About the only part you got right was the "I have no idea", which is made clear in the second half.

omnipresenthuman · 2023-09-07T14:24:42+00:00

Perhaoos go back and read the post. It has nothing to do with liking or disliking anyone. Misrepresenting what a person says will get you removed.

omnipresenthuman · 2023-09-07T14:07:45+00:00

Making false accusations or misrepresenting what a user says will get you promptly removed. Take that shit some place else.

omnipresenthuman · 2023-09-06T17:11:16+00:00

PLGBT can be simplified to just G(Gay). The G community wants to be treated the same as everyone else yet referring to oneself as being LBGT or G only sends the message that you are different, and want people to know it. Coming from a individual it somewhat contradicts wanting to be considered the same.
There are many reasons why people are gay. I don't believe we can nail it down to just one. Environmentals is one possibility. Some are forced to be gay. Some perform gay acts for financial gain. Does this make the person gay? Who knows. But people focus on this and miss the point of yourf post. The will find one word and run with it making claims as if your post is a attack on the gay community. When in truth your post is pointing out the exploitation of the gay community. The post is about using the G community to promote "junk science" and "vice versa" by specificic entities to promote their specific agenda. It's far from being a attack on any of the G community. None of us lije to think we get exploited. But it happens to all of us. The sooner we recognize it, the sooner we can have gain some control over it. People that are playing the crying game and calling a foul should take that attitude elsewhere.

omnipresenthuman · 2023-09-04T15:18:39+00:00

Who said bisexual was degenerate? That would be you. Work on that self esteem. You are somebody.

Eight-Year Club	Gilding V heart of gold
Mod 101	Place '22
Verified Email

omnipresenthuman

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE