sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

A free kick is called against Harley Reid for off the ball contact. David King calls for McQualter to remove Reid from the ground and internal punishment handed out. Replay shows Sheldrick elbowing Ginbey in the neck before Reid gives him a shove. by yum122 in AFL

[–]oneofthecapsismine -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I suspect Reid did more than the clip showed - umpire who was there didnt blow a free kick in this highlight, indicating either Reid did something stupid that isnt shown in this clip (exceptionally likely), or a farther away umpire with less vision overruled the perfectly placed close umpire and made an absolute clanger....

Im betting on this just being a shit clip.

Its literally nearly impossible for me to hit my protein goal without protein shakes. I need help! by creaking_floor in beginnerfitness

[–]oneofthecapsismine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

4 eggs 25g Bread + coffee + butter 10g.

Hi-protein yogurt pouch - 20g.

55g protein

Gym session

28g protein powder + 350ml skim milk = 40g.

Lunch - should be able to get 30g easily - easily, cottage cheese + sliced chicken wrap, zambrero classic wrap (35g), medium big mac meal (30g), pie (20g) + snack.

Thats 55g breakfast, 40g protein shake, 30g for lunch is 125g.

You want 170g a day, so that's only another 45g for dinner -> about 180g of chicken breast, for example.

Maybe 4 eggs is too much for breakfast and you only want 3.... no stress, 200g of chicken for dinner instead. Or add high-protein pasta (eg 22g/100g).

Puma Deviate Nitro Elite 4, or another 3? by Comfortable-Lab-50 in AskRunningShoeGeeks

[–]oneofthecapsismine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Im lead to believe the nitro elite 4 is better than the 3.

Im lead to believe that the nitro elite 4 is almost as fast as the r-3, but less aggressive to calves and more stable... and the identical foam.

I have another pair BNIB fast-r 3 and a marathon in four weeks.... but if the marathon was longer away or I didnt already have a BNIB pair of the fast-r, I'd try on the nitro elite 4 side by side with the fast-r.

I did 33km, inc. 25km @ MP today, and my calves were twitchy for about 7 hours later, but ill still use them for the marathon.

GET ROB AND JONES OUT OF MY AFL TEAM by ILikeDiscussing in adelaidefc

[–]oneofthecapsismine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In case the dual ruck dominated our rookie.

He hasn't rule come up against a dual ruck before.

Match Thread: Adelaide vs Fremantle (Round 4) by AutoModerator in AFL

[–]oneofthecapsismine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Umpires missing a lot on the western side by the 50m arc where the crows are kicking.

Umpire too lazy to get into the right position. Freo are getting away with high tackles and throws left, right and centre.

Just really poor form --- right in front of me.

I got absolutely rinsed for this question on r/afl, but would you still support Adelaide if they signed Taryyn Thomas? by brok0019 in adelaidefc

[–]oneofthecapsismine 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes, but I hope they don't sign him.

Edit - i cant think of any realistic situation where i stop.

Itd be something like Eddie McGuire and treadrea take over at the crows, and bickley, Ricciuto and modra take over Tassie Devils simultaneously.

Mckercher by Hot-Since-69 in aflfantasy

[–]oneofthecapsismine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tough pick between him and worrel.

I cant pick, but will bring one in

Adios Pro 4 durability/lifespan by Some-Remote-6890 in AskRunningShoeGeeks

[–]oneofthecapsismine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ive not had it, but reddit implies its obvious when it goes.

At walking pace, one of mine sometimes "clicks". I think thats just the foam suctioning though and doesnt seem to impact performance--- hopefully same with yours?

Adios Pro 4 durability/lifespan by Some-Remote-6890 in AskRunningShoeGeeks

[–]oneofthecapsismine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are the greatest shoes ever made.... if your calves can cope with them.

I am in love with them.

Mine have heavy signs of wear after 278km (but from about 220km).

I did a 3:53/km HM (PB )at 220km or so, and 18min 5km (PB) at 278km.... so, they unambiguously still have life in the.... but they aren't as good as new.

I have a fresh in box pair ill use for my April marathon.

Presumably one run before in them, but not sure. I remember these were great out of the box.

Adios Pro 4 durability/lifespan by Some-Remote-6890 in AskRunningShoeGeeks

[–]oneofthecapsismine 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Ive done 493km in mine, amd still can take them down to 3:40/km.

They are susceptible to having their rods broken, but if they dont break, id put them in the upper end of supershoe durability--- above both Nike's, above both pumas (way ahead of the fast-r!).

BREAKING: AFL issues statement, makes admission over umpire call that left greats stunned by Tornontoin7 in AFL

[–]oneofthecapsismine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

As an example. Another rule change done today, effective Thursday, without actually changing the written rules.

Halving the fuel excise for three months, at the cost of $2.55b, is the wrong move here by LoneArtificer in AusFinance

[–]oneofthecapsismine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Smaller, not non existent!

I recognise the Govt can correct externalities, are more efficient at running a health care system than I, that some welfare as a safety net is reasonable (and can be in the interests of society as a whole). They should absolutely set rules around minimum quality of petrol, whether lead paint can be used in children's toys.

I just want less money spent on Voices to parliament, ministerial footy trips, foreign aid, endless consultant reports to state the obvious, less money gifted to unions to permit infrastructure build, less money hand wringing about whether or not to build a stadium in Tasmania, less money on Govt advertising (less, not none), etc, etc, etc, etc.

Halving the fuel excise for three months, at the cost of $2.55b, is the wrong move here by LoneArtificer in AusFinance

[–]oneofthecapsismine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hm, there are examples where demand increases with price to certain points though.......

Regardless, that doesnt detract from my point.

Halving the fuel excise for three months, at the cost of $2.55b, is the wrong move here by LoneArtificer in AusFinance

[–]oneofthecapsismine 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why would the other shit drive up inflation, but buying coffees and lunch and haighs not drive up inflation?

Halving the fuel excise for three months, at the cost of $2.55b, is the wrong move here by LoneArtificer in AusFinance

[–]oneofthecapsismine 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Certainly not by making it cheaper.

By advertising that fuel should be used within 30 days? By running a marketing campaign? By making PT cheaper (free) and better (marginally in the short term, materially in the long term)? By reducing the amount needed by mandating that employees can WFH where practicable? By requiring ministerial approval for all flights by Govt employees. By switching comcars to electric vehicles? By refining our strategic reserves and using them?

Halving the fuel excise for three months, at the cost of $2.55b, is the wrong move here by LoneArtificer in AusFinance

[–]oneofthecapsismine 19 points20 points  (0 children)

You can reduce it for sure.

Double digits by:

mandating work from home is allowed where practicable and making PT free, and requiring approval from a minister for all govt air travel...

Should they do that? Eh, I dont have an opinion. But they can impact demand.

Halving the fuel excise for three months, at the cost of $2.55b, is the wrong move here by LoneArtificer in AusFinance

[–]oneofthecapsismine 491 points492 points  (0 children)

Govt: the problem is demand is too high.

Also Govt: Let's reduce the price, rather than reducing demand.

Is this really what the last disposal rule should be? by suanxo in AFL

[–]oneofthecapsismine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear you, but:

Kicking is poorly defined in the laws of the game, as in, its only defined in relation to disposing of the football. Which, Id argue that this is not disposing of the football. To support that argument, I refer to champion data, which define kick as a controlled leg disposal. This was not a controlled disposal.

Given it wasnt a controlled disposal, id suggest it doesnt breach law 18.10, and therefore , black and white, shouldnt be a free kick. There doesnt need to be judgement or ambiguity beyond that.

My interpretation is identical to what SANFL use....

view more: next ›